Paul's foreign policy is clearly isolationist. You can paint it as "non-interventionist" all you want, but Paul's foreign policy is nothing less than naive. Because of this, Paul is not taken as a credible candidate.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > *Cons:* His isolationist foreign policy is incredibly naïve and thus, > dangerous; fails the "nut job" test with many voters; seems too singularly > focused; comes off as a crank; too narrow a support base; name recognition > negatives; perpetual presidential candidate; no clear expression of faith. > > > > > Except that THIS candidate does not have an 'isolationist' foreign policy. > Of course the continuous SNEERing is expected. > > In addition to the usual shenanigans, the author seems more interested in > the status quo -- wanting another Obama term OR for Obama to have Bush's > 4th. > > Regard$, > --MJ > > The Big Lie is a major untruth uttered frequently by leaders as a means of > duping and controlling the constituency. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
