PlainOl wrote:
"Paul is the only presidential candidate proposing policies that address the country’s fundamental economic problems"
======
Not exactly true. Paul's "de-stimulus" is pretty much a carbon copy of Newt Gingrich's "American Solutions"; formulated years before Paul's 2011 campaign announcement.
In general, I agree with both Mr. Gingrich, and if Paul wasn't so far out and naive on foreign policy, and would remove his cuts in defense, I could go along with Dr. Paul's plan.
ROTFLMAO!
Let's see this so-called 'basis'. Post a link.
We can excuse your naivete on foreign policy due to your neocon kool-aid drinking.
Regard$,
--MJ
If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the
'poor'; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no NAFTA, GATT, or "fast-track"; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; no income tax. We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited. --- Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas), 1998. --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
