-------



http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/38816d7c-0c5e-11e1-8ac6-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1ddP8dgRk

Mr President, it’s time to panic

<
http://im.media.ft.com/content/images/04c2e79a-0e07-11e1-91e5-00144feabdc0.img
>

A few weeks ago, James Carville, the legendary manager of Bill Clinton’s
1992 campaign, had a choice word of advice for Barack Obama: “panic”. The
president was heading to disaster in 2012 with the same crew of advisers
that had led him up this blind alley. “Mr President, your hinge of fate
must turn,” Mr Carville said. “This may be news to you but things are not
going well.” Thus, Mr Obama should “fire a lot of people” and set a new
course.

Such is the counsel given to every American president at one time or
another. And many of them follow it. Both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton,
America’s two most successful recent presidents, acquired the habit of
ejecting close friends when something better was on offer. Even George W.
Bush forced himself to break the Cosa Nostra when he finally sidelined Karl
Rove, his electoral “boy wonder”, six years into his presidency.

In his reluctance to change his kitchen cabinet, Mr Obama is an exception –
indeed, his campaign inner circle is actually strengthening its grip on the
White House. The group, which most prominently includes Valerie Jarrett,
the longstanding Chicago friend and mentor to the Obamas; David Plouffe,
the 2008 campaign manager; and David Axelrod, who is now shepherding Mr
Obama’s re-election campaign from Chicago, last week clipped the wings of
Bill Daley, the president’s hapless chief of staff.

The White House said that Mr Daley would share his duties with Peter Rouse,
an Obama old-timer. At a time when Europe is teetering on the brink, the
move looked like one of those over-caffeinated events that sets Washington
speculating but leaves everyone else nonplussed. Yet it also sent a
troubling message that the president remains unable to create a properly
functioning White House. Much of governing is about managing. No one, so
far, has been given the authority to restrain Mr Obama’s inner circle. The
effects have been sorely in evidence over the past 12 months.

Ever hopeful that the president will reclaim what they see as his true
liberal mantle, disillusioned supporters put a different gloss on last
week’s reshuffle – as the welcome conclusion to a year of fruitless
attempts at bipartisanship. A former executive at JPMorgan, Mr Daley was
appointed in the wake of the Democratic party’s “shellacking” in last
year’s congressional elections – the heaviest midterm defeat in 70 years.
His job was to build bridges with the newly victorious Republicans and to
mollify an alienated business community. Neither has gone well.

The president’s deepest humiliation came in the wake of the debt ceiling
debacle in September, when Republicans forced him to reschedule an address
to the joint houses of Congress. Mr Obama, who was to set out his plans to
revive the flagging US economy, had to shift the date after Republicans
said it clashed with a presidential debate. Worse, he then had to bring
forward his speech to the earlier time of 7pm so it did not overlap with a
college football game. It marked a new low in an ever-shrinking presidency.

As for Mr Daley’s charm offensive with business leaders, he did not even
succeed with his friend Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan on
whose board he had served. Mr Dimon, a former backer of Mr Obama who had
been alienated by his Wall Street reform bill, recently had a private
dinner in New York with Mitt Romney, Mr Obama’s likely opponent. Mr Dimon
even attended a fundraising event for the former Massachusetts governor.
All of which may be good reasons to sideline Mr Daley.

Yet they are secondary. Mr Obama’s campaign team has rejected every
transplant he has tried – even ones from Chicago, such as Mr Daley and Rahm
Emanuel, his predecessor. Contrast their experience with that of James
Baker, whom Ronald Reagan hired in preference to his friends to be his
first chief of staff. Mr Baker had run the election campaign of George H.W.
Bush, his Republican rival. Seen by many as the best ever chief of staff,
Mr Baker set out terms of which an Obama appointee could only dream. This
included “hiring and firing authority over all elements of the White House”
and control of every piece of paper that went in and out of the Oval Office.

On his way out, Rahm Emanuel warned Mr Daley that he would be just one
among four de facto chiefs of staff, each with independent access to Mr
Obama. That has proved accurate. Effective presidents rely on powerful
managers, who are not obliged to compete with election consultants for the
president’s ear. At a time when there is “low visibility” in the US
economy, and when volatility holds the whip hand over American politics,
there is greater need than ever for a leader who can focus on the bigger
horizon.

It has been almost three years, and frustrated allies say that Mr Obama
shows few signs of finding a learning curve. He still fails to consult
widely and dislikes “reaching out” when he has to. Many Democrats have
given up trying. “He doesn’t want to listen,” said one senator. “I don’t
think the leopard is going to change his spots.” The plain fact is that Mr
Obama prefers to campaign than govern. With the entrenched inner circle
that he has, no one should be surprised by this. Whether or not Mr Obama
can eke out a victory next year, it would be optimistic to expect things to
change radically in a second term.

[email protected]

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

New Members 1

Visit Your Group
Report any problems, suggestions or abuse to
[email protected]

MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get
the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

<
http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=1ba0aa0a-0e58-11e1-8bd4-23f47ab174bc&T=1c80shctr%2fX%3d1321230738%2fE%3d1705303292%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d552795779%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iUG9kY2FzdHM7TWVzc2FnZV9Cb2FyZHM7TmV3cztHbztGaW5hbmNlO1RWO0V2ZW50cztQZW9wbGU7WWVsbG93X1BhZ2VzO01hcHM7IiBkaXNhYmxlc2h1ZmZsaW5nPSIxIiBzZXJ2ZUlkPSIxYmEwYWEwYS0wZTU4LTExZTEtOGJkNC0yM2Y0N2FiMTc0YmMiIHNpdGVJZD0iNDQ1MjU1MSIgdFN0bXA9IjEzMjEyMzA3MzgxMjUzODEiIA--%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d26228962&U=13cakkilv%2fN%3dGlnfGNj8elY-%2fC%3d493064.14543979.14562481.13298430%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6060255%2fV%3d1
>
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<
http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=2420737/grpspId=1705303292/msgId=253033/stime=1321230738/nc1=5898812/nc2=4507179/nc3=3848627
>
__,_._,___

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to