Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three debates. --- Iran's nukes are not America's business and no more of a threat than Israel, Russia or China nukes. Don't be so afraid.
On Jan 16, 8:32 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Other than Crazy Uncle Ron's recent claims, (because Crazy Uncle Ron at > first beleived that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, but didn't seem > alarmed about it, and when this was pointed out to PlainOl, who also didn't > care, he said, "Cite examples" which I did. Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I > Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three > debates. > > Where are you getting that there is no evidence that Iran is not attempting > to make a nuclear weapon? From Panetta's recent statement? > > http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/damning-report-on-iran-shin... > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8866022/Ira... > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is not a single credible report that says that they are. All the > > reports that are referred to claim a certainty that Iran is in the business > > of processing radioactive material solely for use in their Nuclear reactors > > and medical uses. There is no proof (not a shred) that there is anything > > else going on. Paul is on THAT committee. As opposed to all others he is > > the only candidate that would have access to all the evidence. > > > Iran has a whole lot of oil... they have no refineries... They export > > crude and import gas, oil, and other oil products... that is why Paul says > > they don't even have enough gas for their cars...They don't. > > > The USA has even more oil than Iran.... why in the hell are they using and > > refining the nuclear process?? > > > Do I want someone that looks at and assesses all the facts before > > screaming for war on unfounded bases. Why, yes, I do; if speaking of Paul. > > > If the question is about Monkey man from Iran... then, No, I do not; > > fortunately there is not a shred of credible evidence that this will or can > > take place. > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Keith In Tampa > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other > >> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking > >> nuclear power? > > >> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon? > > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected] > >> > wrote: > > >>> Please read the word COULD>>>>>>> > > >>> Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a > >>> preemptive strike on Iran because “they don’t threaten our national > >>> security.” > >>> “If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that > >>> is their business,” he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building > >>> a nuclear weapon. > >>> A recent IAEA report said that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology > >>> over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb. > >>> And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran “about a year, perhaps > >>> a little less” before it could have a nuclear weapon. > > >>> There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the > >>> positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post > >>> it. > > >>> On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash, > >>> > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you > >>> > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was > >>> > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a > >>> fair, > >>> > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul > >>> > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty > >>> > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which > >>> turns > >>> > out not to be at all accurate or truthful. > > >>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa < > >>> [email protected]>wrote: > > >>> > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and > >>> re-read > >>> > > it. > > >>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican < > >>> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay > >>> > >> misinformed > >>> > >> --- > >>> > >> again, what I've written are facts: > >>> > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an > >>> 'important' > >>> > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world > > >>> > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts > > >>> > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >> > "Some don't forget" what? > > >>> > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash > >>> allegedly > >>> > >> showed > >>> > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to > >>> Jeremy > >>> > >> > Bash? > > >>> > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to > >>> stay > >>> > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but > >>> > >> nevertheless > >>> > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating > >>> their > >>> > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the > >>> > >> misinformation > >>> > >> > as the truth. > > >>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican < > >>> > >> [email protected] > > >>> > >> > > wrote: > >>> > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's > >>> candidacy, > >>> > >> > > called > >>> > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign. > >>> > >> > > --- > >>> > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP. > >>> > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron > >>> Paul > >>> > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt > >>> whomever > >>> > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed > >>> bias > >>> > >> > > against Paul. > > >>> > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her > >>> husband > >>> > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the > >>> Secretary > >>> > >> > > of Defense. > > >>> > >> > > some don't forget > > >>> > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media* > >>> > >> > > > ** > >>> > >> > > > Dyland Stableford > >>> > >> > > > 01.11.2011 > > >>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-... > > >>> > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire > >>> primary, Ron > >>> > >> Paul > >>> > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his > >>> > >> presidential > >>> > >> > > > campaign. > > >>> > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in > >>> second > >>> > >> place, > >>> > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told > >>> > >> supporters at a > >>> > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last > >>> night > >>> > >> was a > >>> > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the > >>> real > >>> > >> > > > conversation." > > >>> > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the > >>> > >> 76-year-old > >>> > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more. > > >>> > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul > >>> said > >>> > >> after > >>> > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted > >>> to > >>> > >> thank > >>> > >> > > the > >>> > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me." > > >>> > >> > > > He continued: > > >>> > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on > >>> > >> what--what is > >>> > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be > >>> > >> ignoring > >>> > >> > > so > >>> > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of > >>> > >> fascinating > >>> > >> > > when > >>> > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it > >>> could be > >>> > >> in the > >>> > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of > >>> have to > >>> > >> chuckle > >>> > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one > >>> > >> thing they > >>> > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status > >>> quo > >>> > >> of this > >>> > >> > > > country. > > >>> > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul > >>> was > >>> > >> forced > >>> > >> > > to cut > >>> > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob > >>> of more > >>> > >> than > >>> > >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop. > > >>> > >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day > >>> and a > >>> > >> half, > >>> > >> > > to > >>> > >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters, > >>> who are > >>> > >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible > >>> > >> > > atmosphere," > >>> > >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement. > > >>> > >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting > >>> out > >>> > >> early > >>> > >> > > from > >>> > >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off, > >>> cutting > >>> > >> the > >>> > >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're > >>> > >> stopping." > > >>> > >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's > >>> candidacy, > >>> > >> > > called > >>> > >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign. > > >>> > >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg > >>> > >> > > > 36KViewDownload > > >>> > >> > > -- > >>> > >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > >>> > >> > > For options & help seehttp:// > >>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >>> > >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > >>> > >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > >>> > >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > >>> > >> -- > >>> > >> Thanks for > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
