Maryland House Approves Gay-Marriage Measure By SABRINA TAVERNISE Published: February 17, 2012
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The Maryland House narrowly passed a law legalizing same-sex marriage on Friday, delivering a major victory to Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, who had proposed it. But its implementation remained uncertain as its opponents promised to take it to voters in November. The bill, known as the Civil Marriage Protection Act, squeaked by in a 71-to-67 vote, drawing loud applause and cheers from proponents in the House. A similar bill had failed in the chamber last year. The measure still faces a vote in the Senate, where it is expected to pass, before Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat who proposed it, can sign it into law. But opponents have pledged to put in on the ballot for a vote on Nov. 6, a prospect that the bill’s supporters acknowledge is practically a foregone conclusion. The vote, said Anthony O’Donnell, a Republican, the minority leader, amounted to “beginning a process, not ending a process. The citizens of Maryland will have the final say.” The debate stretched for hours in the 18th century, wooden-domed statehouse, and was punctuated by emotional entreaties by supporters of the bill, including several gay and lesbian delegates, who talked about their own lives, and other delegates who invoked Jim Crow laws. “This is the civil rights issue of our generation,” said Keiffer J. Mitchell Jr., a Democrat from Baltimore. “I’m overwhelmed,” said Luke Clippinger, one of the seven openly gay members of the Maryland House. “My voice is still breaking.” When asked what the vote meant to him, he said, “It means I’m here.” After the vote, lawmakers who voted for the bill — mostly Democrats — gathered outside the chamber cheering and hugging one another. Soon after, Governor O’Malley arrived, striding into the crowd in a light blue shirt and blue tie, congratulating the delegates, and embracing Mr. Clippinger. The bill’s passage would make Maryland the ninth state to allow gay and lesbian couples to marry. It comes one day after New Jersey’s legislature passed a similar bill, though it was promptly vetoed by that state’s governor. New York State legalized same-sex marriage last year, and this month Washington state did so. In order to be palatable to delegates who were undecided, the bill was amended so that it would not take effect until Jan. 1, 2013, in order to allow the ballot process to take its course. Though Maryland is a heavily Democratic state, the party is sharply divided on the issue of same-sex marriage. Of 98 Democrats in the House, as many as 30 — mostly more-conservative Democrats, known as Blue Dogs, and African-Americans from districts where churches are strong — had been undecided. The bill’s passage was made possible by two Republicans, two Blue Dog Democrats, and two African-American delegates, none of whom were initially supportive. In interviews, several of those delegates said that a key change from last year that won their support was language protecting religious institutions from being forced to perform marriages, among other things. “People believe that it’s a sin for a homosexual to be married, but who are they to judge?” said Robert Costa, one of the Republicans who voted for the bill. “It’s up to God, not government.” John Olszewski, a Democrat who was initially opposed to the legislation, said the religious exemptions made him feel comfortable enough to vote for the bill. “Denying basic rights to folks just isn’t the right thing for us to be doing,” he said. Several delegates said they had been warned by powerful parts of their constituencies that a yes vote would cost them in the next election, scheduled for 2014. Among them, Mr. Mitchell said it was a risk he was willing to take. “I’ve heard all types of threats, that in 2014 at the ballot box, there would be revenge,” he said. “But when that day comes, I know that for the seven openly gay colleagues, if they are able to have the same rights as my wife and I have, then I know that my green vote was the right vote.” Opponents to the measure said they were confident they could gather enough signatures — equal to 3 percent of all the votes in the last election, or about 55,000 — needed to place it on the ballot. If the referendum is successful, it would effectively repeal the bill. A Washington Post poll published on Jan. 30 found that 50 percent of Marylanders supported allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry while 44 percent were opposed. “This will go to the people, and the people will make the decision,” said Pat McDonough, a Republican who voted against the bill. Democrats argued that the bill should not go to a referendum, saying that an issue of civil liberties should not be decided by the majority. They said that integration probably would not have happened at the time, if left up to a popular vote. More: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/us/maryland-house-approves-gay-marriage-measure.html -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
