More Lies, hatred, and false misguided homophobic smears from Little Kiethie Kieth.
On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Tell me that you don't see LilMarxistMoonbatTommyTomTomForNews in this > directive on how to emphasize the militant Gay Agenda. Note the authors, > as they are the ones who created and started the secularist, militant Gay > Agenda. LilMarxistMoonbatTommTomTomForNews is merely a footsoldier: > > STRATEGIES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT: "The Overhauling of Straight America" > > The following article titled "The Overhauling of Straight America'' was > written by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill and appeared in Guide > Magazine, a homosexual publication, in November 1987. This landmark article > has become a "bible" of the homosexual movement, and has since been widely > re-published on the Internet and elsewhere. It outlines strategies and > techniques for a successful widespread propaganda campaign to confuse and > deceive the American people and demonize opponents. Like all propaganda, > their methods are based not on solid intellectual arguments, but instead > upon emotional manipulation of the public in an attempt to gain widespread > sympathy and approval for homosexual behavior. > > As you read this, keep in mind that it was written in 1987 -- less than two > decades ago -- and look around to see how far the homosexual movement has > gotten using these techniques. > > _________________________ > The Overhauling of Straight America > > *by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill* > > The first order of business is desensitization of the American public > concerning gays and gay rights. To desensitize the public is to help it > view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, > we would have straights register differences in sexual preference the way > they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games: she likes > strawberry and I like vanilla; he follows baseball and I follow football. > No big deal. > > At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and > nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full "appreciation" or > "understanding" of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget > about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But > if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing, with a > shrug of their shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is > virtually won. And to get to shoulder-shrug stage, gays as a class must > cease to appear mysterious, alien, loathsome and contrary. A large-scale > media campaign will be required in order to change the image of gays in > America. > > And any campaign to accomplish this turnaround should do six things. > > STEP 1: TALK ABOUT GAYS AND GAYNESS AS LOUDLY AND AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE. > > The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to > look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among > your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior will ultimately > hinge on the number of one's fellows doing it or accepting it. One may be > offended by its novelty at first-- many, in times past, were momentarily > scandalized by "streaking,'' eating goldfish, and premarital sex. But as > long as Joe Six-pack feels little pressure to perform likewise, and as long > as the behavior in question presents little threat to his physical and > financial security, he soon gets used to it and life goes on. The skeptic > may still shake his head and think "people arc crazy these days," but over > time his objections are likely to become more reflective, more > philosophical, less emotional. > > The way to benumb raw sensitivities about homosexuality is to have a lot of > people talk a great deal about the subject in a neutral or supportive way. > Open and frank talk makes the subject seem less furtive, alien, and sinful, > more above-board. Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion > is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or > even practices homosexuality. Even rancorous debates between opponents and > defenders serve the purpose of desensitization so long as "respectable" > gays are front and center to make their own pitch. The main thing is to > talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome. > > And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early > stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be > shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. > Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be > reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the > camel get his nose inside the tent--only later his unsightly derriere! > > Where we talk is important. The visual media, film and television, are > plainly the most powerful image-makers in Western civilization. The average > American household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open > up a gateway into the private world of straights, through which a Trojan > horse might be passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium > is the message-- of normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best > covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream. Bit by bit over > the past ten years, gay characters and gay themes have been introduced into > TV programs and films (though often this has been done to achieve comedic > and ridiculous affects). On the whole the impact has been encouraging. The > prime-time presentation of Consenting Adults on a major network in 1985 is > but one high-water mark in favorable media exposure of gay issues. But this > should be just the beginning of a major publicity blitz by gay America. > > Would a desensitizing campaign of open and sustained talk about gay issues > reach every rabid opponent of homosexuality? Of course not. While public > opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is > the other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only two > things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we > can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for > gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own > about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing > hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of > homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out > of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against > the mighty pull of institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of > Science & Public Opinion (the shield and sword of that accursed "secular > humanism"). Such an unholy alliance has worked well against churches > before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about > the prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work > again here. > > STEP 2: PORTRAY GAYS AS VICTIMS, NOT AS AGGRESSIVE CHALLENGERS. > > In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in > need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume > the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and > prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, > they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that justifies > resistance and oppression. For that reason, we must forego the temptation > to strut our "gay pride" publicly when it conflicts with the Gay Victim > image. And we must walk the fine line between impressing straights with our > great numbers, on the one hand, and sparking their hostile paranoia-"They > are all around us!"--on the other. > > A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols > which reduce the mainstream's sense of threat, which lower it's guard, and > which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms, this > means that jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep very low profile in gay > commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of > nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. (It > almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest margin of > acceptability such as NAMBLA, [Ed note -- North American Man-Boy Love > Association] must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected > child-molesters will never look like victims.) > > Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth > communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims > of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject > their sexual preference. The message must read: "As far as gays can tell, > they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or > bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a > choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully > contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily > have happened to you!" > > Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as victims. Mr. and > Mrs. Public must be given no extra excuses to say, "they are not like us." > To this end, the persons featured in the public campaign should be decent > and upright, appealing and admirable by straight standards, completely > unexceptionable in appearance--in a word, they should be indistinguishable > from the straights we would like to reach. (To return to the terms we have > used in previous articles, spokesmen for our cause must be R-type "straight > gays" rather than Q-type "homosexuals on display.") Only under such > conditions will the message be read correctly: "These folks are victims of > a fate that could have happened to me." > > By the way, we realize that many gays will question an advertising > technique, which might threaten to make homosexuality look like some > dreadful disease, which strikes fated "victims". But the plain fact is that > the gay community is weak and must manipulate the powers of the weak, > including the play for sympathy. In any case, we compensate for the > negative aspect of this gay victim appeal under Principle 4. (Below) > > The second message would portray gays as victims of society. The straight > majority does not recognize ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
