Ms. Fluke --- needs to be reminded that contraception is a personal responsibility, along with the rest of her healthcare
On Mar 5, 8:15 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Sandra Fluke Argued for Mandatory Coverage for Sex-Change Surgery > > *Posted on* | March 5, 2012 > > http://theothermccain.com/2012/03/05/sandra-fluke-argued-for-mandator... > > Rather belatedly, we are becoming aware that this supposedly typical > Georgetown coed is not very typical at all: > > [B]irth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance > must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is *discrimination > deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not > covered by employer provided health insurance*. She makes these views clear > in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of > Gender and the Law. > The title of the article . . . is “Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ > Persons” and was published in the Journal’s 2011 Annual Review. > > Remember, as Byron York previously reported, Fluke was rejected as a > last-minute substitute witness at a Feb. 16 committee hearing because > staffers for Chairman Issa were unable to discover Fluke’s claim to > expertise relevant to the subject of the hearing. This law school journal > article is the sort of thing that might have been discovered about Fluke’s > background, had the Democrats who put Fluke forward as a witness done so > with the usual 72-hour advance notice. Here’s one brief quote from the > article: > > Transgender persons wishing to undergo the gender reassignment process > frequently face heterosexist employer health insurance policies that label > the surgery as cosmetic or medically unnecessary and therefore uncovered. > > Now, imagine Fluke trying to defend this language about “heterosexist” > policies in a public hearing, with Republican members of the committee > questioning her about whether religious institutions (or private > businesses, or taxpayers) should also be required to foot the bill for > “gender reassignment.” > > Congratulations, America: You’ve been scammed! > > *UPDATE*: Dan Collins at The Conservatory points out that the Obama > administration is already providing illegal immigrants with “hormone > treatments for transgendered people.” > > Of course, this only makes sense. We wouldn’t want these foreign > transpeople to go back to wherever they (illegally) came from and say that > they’d been the victims of American “heterosexism,” would we? Then > President Obama would have to issue another apology to the foreigners we > had victimized. > > MoonbatHats..jpg > 147KViewDownload -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
