Tommy,

Again argue the point. Why were they wrong??

On May 4, 2:32 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, they were dead wrong.
>
> Vote these Repugnant homophobes out of office!
>
> On May 1, 2:18 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The Republicans were correct in doing so... My punching you in the
> > face because you are "different" is not a Federal crime. Enforcement
> > does not need Federal money.
>
> > On May 1, 12:43 pm, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Vote these Repugnant homophobes out of office! -T
>
> > > GOP House Strips LGBT Provision from Domestic Violence Act
>
> > > The day after the Senate approved the reauthorization of the Violence
> > > Against Women Act with LGBT-inclusive protections, members of the
> > > Republican-controlled house introduces their own version of the bill
> > > which excludes protections for LGBT citizens.
>
> > > The law organizes federal funding to enhance investigation and
> > > prosecution  of domestic violence and sexual assault while also
> > > supporting victim service programs. Florida Rep. Sandy Adams
> > > introduced the bill with 35 co-sponsors on Friday that excludes the
> > > LGBT-inclusive protections.
>
> > > Adams has a 17-year history of work in law enforcement said when
> > > announcing the bill and was in an abusive relationship with her
> > > ex-husband. "Over thirty years ago, domestic violence was not openly
> > > discussed," she said introducing the bill. "Since 1994, VAWA has
> > > helped bring to light an issue that is often underreported or not
> > > reported at all. According to a recent study, 24 people per minute are
> > > victims of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner
> > > in the United States. With alarming statistics like these, the need
> > > for VAWA is clear. That is why I am proud to introduce the House’s
> > > reauthorization, which aims to make important changes to VAWA, while
> > > ensuring that taxpayer resources help victims--not Washington
> > > bureaucrats. It is my hope that my colleagues in both the House and
> > > Senate can put politics aside and support this lifesaving legislation.
> > > Too many lives are at stake for us to give anything less.”
>
> > > The Senate version, which was passed Thursday, was the first to have
> > > LGBT-inclusive provisions. Senators defeated an amendment, with a
> > > 36-63 vote, that would have rewritten the bill and excluded
> > > protections for LGBT violence victims.
>
> > > According to Sharon Stapel of the Anti-Violence Project, 25%-35% of
> > > same-sex relationships are marred by domestic violence and abuse,
> > > which is about the same rate as other relationships. However, LGBT
> > > domestic violence victims have fewer supportive services, and they
> > > often face discrimination when seeking help. This latest
> > > reauthorization ensures that all people are able to access services
> > > regardless of his or her actual or perceived sexual orientation or
> > > gender identity.
>
> > > More:http://www.advocate.com/politics/washington-dc/2012/05/01/house-strip...
>
> > > --
> > > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > > Have a great day,
> > > Tommy
>
> > > --
> > > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > > Have a great day,
> > > Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to