bad editorial on gays On May 18, 7:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a machine translation.. I don't have time to do it myself..... > > The adoption of laws that promote homosexuality is a severe setback in > our society made up the core of the family... The gay lobby not > struggle for "human rights" fighting for public acceptance of sexual > behavior that is socially rejected, and the victimizarse strategy used > to achieve such acceptance. The reality is that "homosexuals" enjoy > all fundamental human rights (freedom of expression, access to health, > education, decent work, etc.), their rights are guaranteed by our > Constitution, our State does not discriminate and the "cohabitation > societies law" what he wants is an extension of civil rights for a > group of people with a certain unusual sexual behavior; What they do > not enjoy (or enjoy) is acceptance of publishes for its conduct. What > the gay lobby seeks not are "human rights", it is imposing the model > of "diverse sexuality" (homosexualizar) to children and to the Costa > Rican youth. > The "cohabitation societies law" is not another thing that "homosexual > marriage" to the clear detriment of the family; Social insurance, the > labour code, the family code and our model of State are in function of > defending the family into which form the future citizens. > "Homosexuality" is indefensible from any point (biological, social, > theological, etc.)... In Western society no one is convicted > criminally be "gay"... Homosexuality is not an ideology, it is not a > race, not a social class, summary are not a marginalized group that > has to defend... Homosexuality is an unusual sexual behavior practiced > by a group of people (according to numerous studies and articles not > representing or 3% of the populations of countries in first world), if > it is always been present in societies human and it is undeniable... > The issue is that you like unusual behavior, it is practiced in the > personal and private level (to the end of the day each who is > responsible for their own physical and spiritual health)... never > before in the history of mankind had intended to "homosexualizar" > society, the State not incumbent legislation to give legal status to > the preferred sex of an individualsexual preferences remain in an area > deprived of every citizen; It is so ironic as if we will try to create > laws for all groups of people with some particular conduct... On the > other hand this seriously attentive behaviour against public health, > something which does not say the gay lobby is the rate of sexually > transmitted diseases afflicting the population "gay" and they say no > because it does not suit their interests and would generate them a > widespread rejection of Governments and of public opinion, only in the > case of HIV, the gay population has a greater percentage (corroborated > by many items, including here the CCSS made one last year) that the > women's worker sexual, statistically is many times less likely to get > HIV in a casual relationship with a sex worker who with a "gay". > "Homophobia" is a myth, the real discrimination against homosexuals do > not exist, given that, as already mentioned before, enjoy all the > fundamental rights as any citizen, intolerance occurs when > systematically attacks without arguments to an individual or to a > group... However reject conduct against morals, of the family and take > a position against intolerance is not... Those who defend the family, > not ofend the dignity of any "gay", descalificamos behaviour in them > specifically, but their value as human beings... The firm values > defense is not "homophobia" or intolerance, is reason. (Translated by > Bing > )
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
