http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/2221/Whats-Whiter-Than-the-GOP-The-Media.aspx

What's Whiter Than the GOP? The Media!

By Diana West
Friday, August 31, 2012

Ah, to be a member of Big Media when the white Republicans gather to
nominate their white ticket for the White House. It’s like shooting
white elephants in a white convention center, what with their
unbearable whiteness of being – so “non-diverse,” as Big Media
strenuously signal their audiences.

Gallup tells us Republicans are 87 percent white and Democrats are 63
percent white. But even when Republicans are not white – which occurs
despite Big Media efforts to fool viewers (conservative websites
observed that NBC failed to post speeches by non-white Republicans at
its website, while MSNBC cut to its pundits on such non-white
occasions) – they might as well be white. That’s because “white” is
the media’s slam on the GOP, their hectoring, subtle-as-a-sledgehammer
message: Republicans are too “white” to deserve any decent person’s
vote. Perhaps veteran ABC and PBS political editor turned Yahoo! News
Washington bureau chief David Chalian blurted out the story line best:
“(The Romneys) are happy to have a party with black people drowning.”

This, it turned out, was a race-bait too far. Chalian lost his job
after his comment went viral. But who will take his place? Someone
just like him. Probably someone who looks like him, too – and those
dread, white Republicans.

That’s the dirty secret. Big Media are castigating the party of
Lincoln and Reagan for displaying, as the Los Angeles Times put it, “a
distinctly pale hue” while “the United States has become an
increasingly more diverse country,” but the newsrooms of America are
just as pale if not actually more so. According to 2012 figures from
the American Society of News Editors (ASNE), minorities make up 12.32
percent of newsroom employees. That leaves 87.68 percent of the
writing and editing jobs in white hands. That means newsrooms are
lily-whiter than the GOP!

Some news organizations take this to the limit. While Time magazine
dings the GOP for being “a mostly white, aging party (doing) its best
to avoid looking like it,” the National Association of Black
Journalists (NABJ) gave Time its 2012 Thumbs Down Award for, among
other grievances, not having a single full-time black correspondent.

The media also hold a slim white edge over the GOP in the racial
composition of television newsroom managers. According to a 2011 NABJ
study, white people – mainly white men – hold 88 percent of these
decision-making jobs, leaving 12 percent to minorities. As for news
anchors and presidential debate moderators? To build on a title of a
Salon.com piece about the GOP convention, welcome to the “Heart of
Whiteness.”

Stunningly, these same Caucasian newsies are blind to their own skins.
How else, for instance, could “NBC Nightly News” anchor Brian Williams
in July have asked Mitt Romney “to confirm or deny” whether he was
looking for a running mate who is “an incredibly boring white guy”?

“You told me you were not available,” quipped Romney.

But Williams and the rest of his mainly white media brethren (also
sistren) seem to regard their core liberalism as their camouflage. It
is the shield and spear they carry in the left’s push to demonize
people of one color (white) and a particular sex (male) in order to
delegitimize a glorious political philosophy – small-government,
low-tax, anti-statist conservatism. This philosophy is what draws
together Republicans and their delegates, not their “whiteness.”

What the left and its media acolytes are trying to do is poison the
wider appeal of the Republican message by depicting it as race-based
and retrograde. This is a dirty operation. It is also the height of
hypocrisy, given that it is being led by a bunch of truly “angry white
men” against what is purported to be another.

GOP membership is 53 percent male and 47 percent female. (The
Democrats are 45 percent male and 55 percent female.) But take the
perfectly liberal New York Times. While it perseverates on the GOP
becoming “a smaller, older, whiter and more male party” from the
confines of its mainly white and male newsroom, it publishes 80
percent male-written op-eds, according to a recent byline survey cited
in the Columbia Journalism Review. Meanwhile, the newspaper’s own
“party” of readers, according to the Pew Research Center in 2010, is
59 percent men and 41 percent women. Call in the “gender gap” police!

Comedy Central’s Stephen Colbert – a major “news” source for young
adults – sarcastically razzes Mitt Romney for his “bold” choice of a
running mate who is “white, Christian and male.” But with an audience
that is largely white, likely majority-Christian and, says Pew, 65
percent male, how does Colbert rate as “bolder”?

The answer is that “The Colbert Report,” like the rest of what passes
for news media, is much, much further to the left. They are so far to
the left they can’t imagine anyone can see their acid hypocrisy and
ideological warfare play out in living color.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to