**

** **

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/2/police-groups-urge-limit-on-drones/print/
****

** **
Police groups urge limit on drones****Public unease on privacy issues spurs
call for usage restrictions ****

By Ben Wolfgang <http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/ben-wolfgang/>****

-****

Faced with a skeptical public uneasy about the potential impact of drones
on personal privacy, three leading law enforcement groups on Friday
endorsed industry-backed guidelines limiting the use of unmanned aerial
vehicles (UAVs).****

It's the latest move in the drone sector's ongoing fight against the
popular concern that the aircraft represent a new sort of "Big Brother,"
capable of looking through windows and flying undetected above American
neighborhoods. Police and other law enforcement agencies, already using
UAVs on a limited basis, are pushing back hard against that perception.****

The Airborne Law Enforcement Association, the FBI Law Enforcement Executive
Development Association and the FBI National Academy Associates on Friday
joined the International Association of Chiefs of Police in supporting new
rules designed to keep police and other agencies from abusing the new
powers and capabilities that come with drones, which are now used only by
government entities, but will be available for personal and commercial use
beginning in 2015.****

The guidelines call for law enforcement personnel to "secure a search
warrant prior to conducting the flight" if a drone could possibly infringe
upon "reasonable expectations of privacy." The rules also say that any
images collected by an unmanned vehicle will not be kept unless they are
"evidence of a crime" or part of an ongoing investigation.****

Unless the photos or videos obtained by UAVs are exempted by law, they
should be available for public inspection, the policy states.****

The drone sector's leading trade group, the Association for Unmanned
Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), has come out in favor of such
privacy protections. Earlier this summer, the organization released its own
voluntary "code of conduct" for all who design, test and operate unmanned
vehicles.****

"Unmanned aircraft help law enforcement agencies with missions, such as
search and rescue, crime-scene photography and other dangerous or difficult
tasks, often at a lower cost than manned aircraft," AUVSI President and CEO
Michael Toscano said in a statement.****

The law enforcement guidelines "exemplify the community's commitment to use
this technology responsibly and with respect to the individual rights we
all cherish," he said.****

Recent polling found that the public is supportive of drones in some law
enforcement capacities, but skeptical about others. A June survey by
Monmouth University found that 80 percent of Americans support UAVs as part
of search-and-rescue missions. More than two-thirds support using drones to
track down runaway criminals, and 64 percent think they should be employed
at U.S. borders to stop the flow of illegal immigrants.****

But Americans have a far different view when it comes to routine police
activity. More than two-thirds oppose the use of drones to issue speeding
tickets. Only 23 percent support that idea.****

** **

** **

 __._,_.___
  Reply to 
sender<[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%20Police%20groups%20urge%20limit%20on%20drones>|
Reply
to 
group<[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%20Police%20groups%20urge%20limit%20on%20drones>|
Start
a New 
Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbTlhZmpuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzNDY3MDkyMTI->
 Recent Activity:

   - New 
Members<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJnZjhpcm01BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxMzQ2NzA5MjEy?o=6>
   3

 Visit Your 
Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZms1ZmVyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzNDY3MDkyMTI->
 [image: Yahoo!
Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcmZkMHAxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM0NjcwOTIxMg-->
Switch to: 
Text-Only<[email protected]?subject=Change+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>,
Daily 
Digest<[email protected]?subject=Email+Delivery:+Digest>•
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>•
Terms
of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
   .

__,_._,___

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to