http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/08/if-paul-ryan-were-an-atlas-shrugged-character-hed-be-a-villain/261036/

On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Randist Bo7b aka Bob Wynman WWP Email Member
wrote:

> Randist Bo7b aka Bob Wynman WWP Email Member 
> <[email protected]<javascript:;>>
> Robert Ringer, John Stossel, Andrew Galambos & Ayn Rand are RIGHT!
>
> I'd go even farther, regarding the pervasive myth that :government can do
> things better than we as individuals":
>
> THINK:  "Governments" can do NOTHING.  NONE of the things that people seem
> to believe that "governments do, like build roads, defend the country,
> educate the kids, deliver the mail, put satellites into orbit, pay for
> medicine, housing, food, catch criminals, etc., etc., etc.  INDIVIDUAL
> PEOPLE do all those things.  "Government" is just a "middle man" ... with a
> gun, FORCING people to do things ... and stealing the wealth and property
> of other people to pay the people doing the things.
>
> It's a completely immoral and irrational system based on FORCE, COERCION &
> THEFT.
>
> We MUST build the durable, stable free civilization, WITHOUT the State
> (aka "government").
>
> An interesting start in this regard can be obtained, mostly FREE:
>
> 1--Fred Marks is making the work of Andrew Galambos available ... FREE
> www.CapitalismTheLiberalRevolution.com.
>
> 2--Dave Woodward & Nancy Rhyme Snelson:  Jay's V-50 seminars
> www.suscivinst.com/store.
>
> 3--Stefan Molyneux:  thousands of hours of information  FREE
> www.FreeDomainRadio.com.
>
> 4--Dennis Riness:  Civilization Engineering DVD & syllabus
> www.CivilizationEngineering.com.
>
> 5--Bonnie Lange:  V-76, "The Declaration,Thomas Paine & Your Freedom" FREE
> www.Galambos.com.
>
>
> --bob & lou
> www.wynman.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard B. Boddie
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:33 PM
> Subject: 3/14/06 hi set Ringer On Stossel's :Intuitive"
>
>
> John Stossel on Intuitively Trusting
> the Government
>
> By Robert Ringer
>
> May 21, 2012
>
> In his new book, No, They Can’t: Why Government Fails — But
> Individuals Succeed, John Stossel has zeroed in on an interesting
> theory about what causes people to believe they need government
> to be involved in so many areas of their lives. He believes that the
> notion that government can do things better than individuals is
> “intuitive.”
>
> But what, exactly, is intuition? One dictionary defines it as “Direct
> perception of truth … independent of any reasoning process.” That
> definition, however, invites another question: What is “truth?”
>
> A person’s perception of truth can be correct or incorrect.
>
> By correct or incorrect, I’m equating truth to reality. If a person’s
> perception of truth is not reality, his intuition is defective. On the
> other hand, if a person’s perception of truth is reality, his intuition
> is sound.
>
> Thus, the kind of intuition John Stossel is talking about is defective
> intuition — i.e., people who perceive untrue things to be true, without
> applying reason to their thinking. Such people are said to be “out of
> touch with reality.”
>
> There’s little doubt that defective intuition is an epidemic in today’s
> Orwellian world. But it does raise yet another question: What causes
> people to have faulty intuition?
>
> Hint: The late and legendary Andrew Galambos, whom Harry Browne
> once dubbed the “unknown libertarian,” is purported to have taught
> in his private lectures that almost everything everybody believes is
> wrong.
>
> Many of Galambos’s ideas were, and still are, controversial, but my
> firsthand experience has convinced me that he was spot on with this
> particular insight. I never cease to be mystified by how so many people
> so readily embrace myths — particularly government myths — even
> when such myths clearly contradict common sense.
>
> Worse, myths tend to grow and become more entrenched over time. To parody
> the words of Thomas Jefferson, the natural progress of things is
> for truth to yield and myths to gain ground.
>
> The reason government myths are so prevalent is that, through gradualism,
> generations of citizens have become used to government dominating their
> lives.
>
> This acceptance of government intrusiveness as the norm causes people
> to intuitively believe all kinds of myths about government, politics,
> ideology, and economics, all of which are interconnected.
>
> For example:
>
> ·        Why do so many people intuitively believe that political action
> is the answer to so many of our problems, when the empirical evidence is
> that
> it almost always makes problems worse?
>
> ·        Why do so many people intuitively believe that electing someone
> new
> will change things for the better, when almost all newly elected
> politicians end up protecting the status quo?
>
> ·        Why do so many people intuitively equate wealth with evil when, in
> fact, the two are in no way connected?
>
> ·        Conversely, why do so many people intuitively equate poverty with
> moral superiority, when, in fact, the two are in no way connected?
>
> ·        Why do so many people believe that government should “do
> something about the economy,” when it has proven, time and again,
> that its actions almost always make the economy worse?
>
> ·        Why do so many people believe that government should make life
> more fair, when it has no constitutional authority to become involved
> in an abstraction such as fairness?
>
> I happen to believe in Stossel’s premise that individuals can do most
> everything better than the government. In fact, I would classify it as
> an axiom.
>
> Do I believe individuals can operate private fire-fighting companies
> that are superior to government-owned and operated fire departments? Yes!
>
> Do I believe individuals, acting in their own self-interest, can protect
> the environment better than the government? Yes!
>
> Do I believe that individuals, voting with their dollars, can discourage
> monopolies more effectively than the government? Yes!
>
> Do I believe individuals can build and operate streets and roads better
> than the government? Yes!
>
> Based on the ideology, arrogance, and incompetence of the criminal
> class that now controls the levers of power in Washington, I’m not even
> certain that government can do a better job than individuals when it
> comes to carrying out its traditional duties of defending our national
> security, protecting our lives and property, and providing a court system
> for settling contractual disputes and punishing those who commit
> aggression against others.
>
> Finally, the biggest driver of the defective, intuitive belief that
> government
> is all-knowing is our entitlement-centered culture. It’s not just a figure
> of speech when we repeatedly hear that people are addicted to entitlements.
>
> This addiction to unearned benefits can cause people to panic when
> government runs out of other people’s money — as we’ve seen in Greece,
> Portugal, Spain, California, Wisconsin, New Jersey, et al. In this regard,
> the words of Buddha are as relevant today as they were more than 2,500
> years ago: “All unhappiness is caused by attachment.” Have you seen a happy
> Greek lately?
>
> Buddha said something even more profound when it comes to combating
> myth-based intuition: “Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or
> who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own
> reason and your own common sense.”
>
> Barack Obama, on the other hand, says, “Believe everything I say, no
> matter what you read or hear to the contrary, or who said or wrote it,
> no matter if God said it, regardless of whether it agrees with your own
> reason and your own common sense.”
>
> Unfortunately, because Buddha isn’t on television every day, about half
> the people in America seem to be taking advice from the guy who is —
> Chairman Obama.
>
> If you ever find yourself saying things like, “There ought to be a law”
> or “The government needs to reform this or that” or “Congress has to
> stop the bickering and get something done,” it’s a sure sign that you
> need to work on your intuition. Start with the writings of the Founding
> Fathers, then move on to Lysander Spooner, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich
> Hayek, and Ayn Rand … and keep going.
>
> When you reach the point where you think you understand why
> government fails and individuals succeed, and a mustachioed chap
> with a familiar face invites you inside, you will undoubtedly have
> arrived on John Stossel’s doorstep.
>
> And don’t be surprised if he asks you, “What took you so long?”
>
> You have permission to reprint this article so long as you place the
> following wording at the end of the article:
>
> Copyright © 2012 Robert Ringer
> ROBERT RINGER is a New York Times #1 bestselling author and host of the
> highly acclaimed Liberty Education Interview
> Series, which features interviews with top political, economic, and social
> leaders. He has appeared on Fox News, Fox Business,
> The Tonight Show, Today, The Dennis Miller Show, Good Morning America, The
> Lars Larson Show, ABC Nightline, and The
> Charlie Rose Show, and has been the subject of feature articles in such
> major publications as Time, People, The Wall Street
> Journal, Fortune, Barron's, and The New York Times.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "We are discreet sheep; we wait to see how the drove is going, and then
> go with the drove. We have two opinions: one private, which we are
> afraid to express; and another one - the one we use - which we force
> ourselves to wear to please Mrs. Grundy, until habit makes us
> comfortable in it, and the custom of defending it presently makes us
> love it, adore it, and forget how pitifully we came by it. Look at it in
> politics."
>
> --Mark Twain [Samuel Langhorne Clemens] (1835-1910)
>
> --bob & lou
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> This email group is to share information, opinions, and experiences that
> relate to politics. Please be polite, open-minded, and tolerant.
> World-wide_Politics is not responsible for the comments, copyrights, or
> topics of messages received on this email group. Messages are the complete
> responsibility of the sender. World-wide_Politics reserves the right to
> modify messages or delete posts considered not appropriate for this email
> group, revoke posting privileges, and/or revoke the membership of any group
> member. Posts about religion should relate to politics.
> Ideal Post Format
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/World-wide_Politics/files/Ideal%20Post%20Format
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/World-wide_Politics/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
>     Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/World-wide_Politics/join
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
>     [email protected] <javascript:;>
>     [email protected] <javascript:;>
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     [email protected] <javascript:;>
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to