As you know,  I don't have a lot of respect for Richman,  but he hits the
nail on the head in this article.




On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> *The Right to Choose What?
> *by Sheldon Richman <http://www.fff.org/aboutUs/bios/sxr.asp>, August 2000
>
> Regardless of one's position on abortion, believers in freedom and
> individual rights should be offended by the pro-abortion advocates'
> opportunistic shrinking of "a woman's right to choose" down to a single
> choice. The use of that euphemism hints at a certain squeamishness on its
> users' part. Can't they say the word "abortion"?
>
> If a woman has a "right to choose" an abortion--if this is a matter of her
> very dignity--then it is perplexing why, according to these folks, she
> doesn't also have the right to choose to:
>
> Keep a handgun in her purse and nightstand drawer without having to get
> permission from the government.
>
> Send her kids to private schools without having also to pay taxes for the
> government's schools, which are playgrounds for unionized teachers.
>
> Decide how to plan and save for her own retirement and to opt out of the
> government's dependency-inducing Social Security system.
>
> Decide how to plan and save for her own medical care in retirement and to
> opt out of the government's dependency-inducing Medicare program.
>
> Purchase medical insurance free of government mandates requiring coverage
> she does not want.
>
> Ingest whatever substances she wishes without checking to see whether they
> are on the government's controlled-substances list.
>
> Gamble however she pleases.
>
> Trade sexual favors for money.
>
> Keep all her income without fearing a visit from armed agents of the
> Internal Revenue Service.
>
> Buy imports from anywhere in the world, such as clothing for her children,
> free of tariffs and quotas designed to protect domestic products she finds
> inferior or too expensive.
>
> Buy milk for her children without paying artificially high prices created
> by government programs to subsidize the dairy industry.
>
> Take a job that pays less than the legislated minimum wage.
>
> Abstain from paying dues to a labor union she wishes not to join.
>
> Select an automobile from an array not tilted toward more dangerous
> lighter models by the government's superfluous fuel-efficiency standards.
>
> Buy gasoline for her car that is not made artificially expensive by taxes
> and irrational environmental regulations.
>
> Earn a higher salary instead of seeing some of her income diverted to
> satisfying the government's OSHA regulations, which have had no bearing on
> workplace safety anyway.
>
> Use life-saving medicines and medical devices currently kept off the
> market by irrational and onerous FDA procedures.
>
> Patronize doctors, lawyers, and other professionals whose credentials are
> vouched for by someone other than government licensing boards, which exist
> simply to keep the licensees' incomes artificially high.
>
> Smoke tobacco free from government regulations.
>
> Throw trash away without wasting time recycling.
>
> Give more than $1,000 to a political candidate.
>
> Leave her entire estate to her children and not a penny to the government.
>
> Go to college without having to pay a tuition artificially inflated by
> government loans and grants.
>
> Start a business without undergoing a gauntlet of licenses, taxes, and
> regulations.
>
> Surf the Web without fearing that the government is monitoring her journey
> through cyberspace.
>
> Send e-mail without fearing that the government is reading it.
>
> Put an NRA or pro-tax-cut bumper sticker on her car without wondering
> whether the police will think she's an "extremist."
>
> Join an off-beat religious group without fearing that the government will
> decide to launch a SWAT invasion and gas her and her children.
>
> Develop her land even if the Army Corps of Engineers insists it's a
> wetland.
>
> Develop her land even if the Environmental Protection Agency believes that
> some insect, rodent, or bird is "endangered."
>
> Buy something to make her life more pleasant rather than see that portion
> of her income spent to bomb people in other countries or to starve them
> with economic sanctions.
>
> Go about her business without fearing that the government is compiling
> dossiers on her.
>
> Associate in any way with people born in other countries regardless of
> whether the INS thinks they should be here.
>
> Purchase a toilet that flushes properly, rather than one conforming to
> idiotic environmental regulations.
>
> Not pay for someone else's "right to choose" to have an abortion if it
> violates her convictions or if she simply doesn't want to.
>
> By the way, why shouldn't men have these same rights to choose?
>
>  http://www.fff.org/comment/ed0800a.asp
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to