Dear MJ: It's good that you value the 'ideal' of a democracy, or: "One person, one vote, accurately counted." Voting machines of old, that punched paper, allowed cross-checking against the number of voters who signed-in. Then, along came "computers" that (supposedly) keep the vote totals... "accurate". But I know, and you know, that there are "back doors" into any computer program. Now, the "integrity" of the entire voting process hinges on WHO programmed the system. If that person was a Democrat, then expect that traitor Barack Obama to "get" at least 1% more of the vote than will actually be cast. Sad, but true; sad, but true.
Since I am an inventor—in addition to being an author and a patriot—I have designed an intuitive and un corruptible voting machine. Without getting too technical, the vote totals are determined in each precinct by WEIGHING BB shots. If there are, say, seventeen voting decisions which must be made, there will be a precisely indexed space under a Plexiglas-top voting machine that will hold only 17 BBs. To vote for a particular candidate, the voter will use a pointed stylus to move each BB into the ONE place next to that candidate’s name. Once all seventeen BBs have been placed, a lever will be pushed allowing the various BBs to fall into vials large enough for the votes of all of those registered in that precinct. In about 1 minute per candidate, the total number of voters can be determined to high accuracy simply by weighing the SEALED vials and dividing by the weight of a single BB shot. Of course, this “low tech” way of counting votes must get past the corrupt ones in government happy to have a ’back door’ way of determining who wins the elections. Millions of largely naïve voters must wise-up, or the USA will continue going down the tubes of socialism. — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot On Sep 30, 9:01 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > With the ability to manipulate with the Voting Machines themselves -- you > know, those who do NOT print *any* 'receipt' or otherwise that would PROVE > one voted for Candidate A -- why would anyone bother manipulating voter rolls > and the like? > Regard$, > --MJ > If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. -- Emma Goldman > Suspicious voter registration forms found in 10 Florida counties > > Florida elections officials said Friday that at least 10 counties have > identified suspicious and possibly fraudulent voter registration forms turned > in by a firm working for the Republican Party of Florida, which has filed an > election fraud complaint with the the state Division of Elections against its > one-time consultant. The controversy in Florida -- which began with possibly > fraudulent forms that first cropped up in Palm Beach County -- has engulfed > the Republican National Committee, which admitted Thursday that it urged > state parties in seven swing states to hire the firm, Strategic Allied > Consulting.The RNC paid the company... > http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-voter-registration-florida-republicans-20120928,0,7654954.story > > Click here: Suspicious voter registration forms found in 10 Florida counties > -latimes.com > > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
