I'm curious John, where do you draw the line on socialism/communism? You are getting close to being able to retire, do you plan on collecting your Social Security benefits, or will you turn them down? How about your mortgage? Was it in any way subsidized by VA, or any other government entitlement program?
When you start accusing the current Republican candidates as being socialist or communist, especially as compared to those across the aisle, I would very much like to know exactly where you stand on the "socialist scale". On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Correction: Make that "cancers that ARE socialism and communism". > Some of you may be interested in reading this link to another post of > mine: Shouldn’t the voters be selecting our president? > > https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/49915c2fa1af7c1e/cb00328846cfa068?hl=en#cb00328846cfa068 > — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot > > On Oct 12, 11:25 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear MJ: Having the Republicans win big in November is simply putting > > a BandAid on the cancers that is SOCIALISM and COMMUNISM, which are > > knocking down our 'door'. Capitalism IS the answer! But only if, > > somehow, the get-get section of our society can realize that having > > government borrow or print money for their... "free lunches", will not > > work, indefinitely. This race points out the shallowness of most > > voters, especially, the nearly brainless "undecideds". *** What is > > needed is less deference to the disparate groups, and more attention > > to doing the sure things that will benefit the most Americans, left > > and right. The latter was the reason my "NC" was written, and its the > > ONLY justification for courting the majority votes from either party's > > perspective. — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot > > > > On Oct 11, 8:26 am, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > "However, the people who vote don't look at details; they listen to > the sound bites and rhetoric that tell them what they want to hear. Herein > is the source of my desire for a Democratic landslide. As I said, I believe > the worst is yet to come. There will be a collapse worse than 2008 andif > Romney is President what the majority of the people will believe is that > his "free market" plan did not work. All they will know is Romney's > "radical capitalism" caused a disaster and the very idea of genuine free > market solutions will be set back for decades, if not generations.My hope > is that if the Democrats are in charge when the collapse happens, the idea > of government as an economic savior will be collapse as well and that > maybea real free market solutionwill have a chance."Why I Want a Democratic > Landslideby Chris Kahn > > > I want to see the Democrats win all the way around; the Presidency, > the Senate and the House of Representatives. It is not for the reasons you > might think. I have no illusions. I do not think they will do anything to > address any of the issues I consider important. I think they will do all > the wrong things and it will accomplish nothing but to make things worse. > Not that I think the Republicans are any better. They would also accomplish > nothing either. > > > I have no doubt that the United States are headed for a financial > crisis that will make 2008 look like a picnic. None ofthe underlying > issuesthat rose to the surface then have been addressed. They have simply > been papered over with lies and flimflammery. Sound and fury signifying > nothing. > > > The problem is the media and the punditry have created a false > narrative. Voters have been told that there is a clear choice. On one side > is a Democratic party that believes government should take extraordinary > measures to stimulate the economy and alleviate the effects of unregulated > greed among the big Wall Street banks. On the other side is a Republican > party offering radical free market policies that would cut government > spending to the bone and take us back to gilded age of robber barons and > sweatshops. > > > The portrayal of the Democrats is for the most part accurate. They > really do believe that government should act despite the fact that every > time such policies have been enacted they have failed. One only has to > compare the responses tothe depression of 1920 to those of 1929. One > resulted in a quick recovery, the other lead to fifteen years of stagnation > that was only relieved by the demobilization at the end of World War II and > the explosion of prosperity in the 1950s brought about by the reduction of > federal economic management. > > > It is the image of the Republicans that bothers me. Mitt Romney and > Paul Ryan are being portrayed as champions of free markets. Nothing could > be further than the truth. Ryan's proposed budget has been criticized > asdrastic. The truth is even Fox News recognizes that Ryan's "budget plan > doesn't actually slash the budget." In reality, the Republicans wouldn't > know a real budget cutting planif it were presented to them. > > > However, the people who vote don't look at details; they listen to the > sound bites and rhetoric that tell them what they want to hear. Herein is > the source of my desire for a Democratic landslide. As I said, I believe > the worst is yet to come. There will be a collapse worse than 2008 and if > Romney is President what the majority of the people will believe is that > his "free market" plan did not work. All they will know is Romney's > "radical capitalism" caused a disaster and the very idea of genuine free > market solutions will be set back for decades, if not generations. My hope > is that if the Democrats are in charge when the collapse happens, the idea > of government as an economic savior will be collapse as well and that > maybea real free market solutionwill have a chance. > http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/kahn-c1.1.1.html- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
