As is typical, the COURT failed to apply the Constitution.
They got the correct result, but their reasoning was nonsensical -- not that such is new.
Regard$,
--MJ
I was about to say that I'd hate to live in a country where the law could mean whatever its rulers said it meant, when it occurred to me that I already do. -- Joseph Sobran
At 09:24 AM 11/5/2012, you wrote:
more damaging to the nation than Bush v. Gore--
----------------------------------------
I found that to be an excellent lesson in Constitutional law for all of us.
I admit I was surprised Al Gore needed one, but he got one.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
