For the past three years, the Internal Revenue Service hasn't been
investigating complaints of partisan political activity by churches,
leaving religious groups who make direct or thinly veiled endorsements
of political candidates unchallenged.
Associated Press
New York
Nov 5, 2012

The IRS monitors religious and other nonprofits on everything from
salaries to spending, and that oversight continues. However, Russell
Renwicks, a manager in the IRS Mid-Atlantic region, recently said the
agency had suspended audits of churches suspected of breaching federal
restrictions on political activity. A 2009 federal court ruling
required the IRS to clarify which high-ranking official could
authorize audits over the tax code's political rules. The IRS has yet
to do so.

Dean Patterson, an IRS spokesman in Washington, said Renwicks, who
examines large tax-exempt groups, "misspoke." Patterson would not
provide any specifics beyond saying that "the IRS continues to run a
balanced program that follows up on potential noncompliance."

However, attorneys who specialize in tax law for religious groups, as
well as advocacy groups who monitor the cases, say they know of no IRS
inquiries in the past three years into claims of partisanship by
houses of worship. IRS church audits are confidential, but usually
become public as the targeted religious groups fight to maintain their
nonprofit status.

"The impression created is that no one is minding the store," said
Melissa Rogers, a legal scholar and director of the Center for
Religion and Public Affairs at Wake Forest University Divinity School
in North Carolina. "When there's an impression the IRS is not
enforcing the restriction — that seems to embolden some to cross the
line."

The issue is closely watched by a cadre of attorneys and former IRS
officials who specialize in tax-exempt law, along with watchdog groups
on competing sides of the church-state debate.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which seeks
strict limits on religious involvement in politics, and the Alliance
Defending Freedom, which considers the regulations unconstitutional
government intrusion, scour the political landscape for any potential
cases. While Americans United gathers evidence it hopes will prompt an
IRS investigation, the Alliance Defending Freedom jumps in to provide
a defense. Neither group knows of any IRS contact with houses of
worship over political activity since the 2009 federal ruling.

Nicholas Cafardi, a Duquesne University Law School professor and Roman
Catholic canon lawyer who specializes in tax-exempt law, said he has
heard of no IRS inquiries over churches and politics in the last three
years. Neither has Marcus Owens, a Washington attorney who spent a
decade as head of the IRS tax-exempt division and is now in private
practice.

Owens, who was with the IRS through 2000, said the agency had once
initiated between 20 and 30 inquiries each year concerning political
activity by churches or pastors. He said he knows of only two recent
cases the IRS pursued against houses of worship or pastors, and
neither involved complaints over partisan activity.

"What the IRS is desperate to do is to avoid signaling to churches and
pastors that there is no administrative oversight," Owens said. "The
IRS has been vigilant with regard to civil fraud and criminal cases,
but those aren't all that common."

The tax code allows a wide range of political activity by houses of
worship, including speaking out on social issues and organizing
congregants to vote. But churches cannot endorse a candidate or engage
in partisan advocacy. The presidential election has seen a series of
statements by clergy that critics say amount to political
endorsements. Religious leaders say they are speaking about public
policies, not candidates, and have every right to do so.

The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association has recently taken out full-
page ads in major newspapers, featuring a photo of renowned evangelist
Billy Graham, urging Americans to vote along biblical principles.
Graham met last month with Mitt Romney and pledged to do "all I can"
to help the Republican presidential nominee.

In a survey last week by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 40
percent of black Protestants who attend worship services regularly
said their clergy have discussed a specific candidate in church — and
the candidate in every instance was President Barack Obama.

This Sunday, Roman Catholic Bishop Daniel Jenky of Peoria, Ill.,
ordered all the priests in his diocese to read a statement urging
Catholics to vote and stating that, "Catholic politicians,
bureaucrats, and their electoral supporters who callously enable the
destruction of innocent human life in the womb also thereby reject
Jesus as their Lord."

In Texas, a pastor of a small independent church posted a sign on the
front of the building that read, "Vote for the Mormon, not the
Muslim." Romney is the first Mormon nominee for president by a major
party. Opponents of Obama, who is Christian, have spread false rumors
that he is Muslim.

Renwicks made his comments Oct. 18, at a Washington seminar on tax-
exempt organizations presented by the American Law Institute-
Continuing Legal Education. Responding to a moderator's question about
the status of church audits, Renwicks said, "we're basically holding
any potential church audits — they're basically in abeyance.

"I haven't done a church audit in quite some time," said Renwicks,
according to a recording of the talk provided by the American Law
Institute. "There were one or two — what I'd call somewhat, maybe
potentially egregious cases — where I thought maybe, we need to go out
there, but even those were put in abeyance until we get the signature
issue resolved."

An IRS reorganization in 1998 put responsibility for authorizing the
audits in the hands of lower-ranking IRS officials. A Minnesota
pastor, who faced an audit over his 2007 endorsement from the pulpit
of Rep. Michele Bachmann, argued the IRS was violating its own rules.
In 2009, a federal judge agreed, prompting a formal IRS rule-making
process that continues today.

Dean Zerbe, a former senior counsel to the Senate Finance Committee
who specializes in tax fraud and abuse, said the audits are "an
extremely hellish area for the IRS to deal with."

The agency has to balance enforcement with churches' First Amendment
rights. Even when the federal agency finds an outright violation, the
penalty for houses of worship is usually little more than a warning.
The IRS has revoked nonprofit status in just a handful of these cases
since the rules for religious groups were adopted in 1954.

Last month, more than 1,500 pastors, organized by the Alliance
Defending Freedom, endorsed a candidate from the pulpit and then sent
a record of their statement to the IRS, hoping their challenge would
eventually end up in court. The Alliance has organized the event,
called "Pulpit Freedom Sunday," since 2008. The IRS has never
contacted a pastor involved in the protest.

"I think people are misled to think the IRS wakes up every morning
wanting to knock on the door of a church or synagogue," said Zerbe.
"Most senators blanch at the idea of having an IRS agent in the pews
listening to what's going on from the pulpit. ... I think the IRS in
some ways reflects that similar discomfort."

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to