we find similar catalytic elements of a definitely neoconnish
complexion
---
good oberservation

know the enemy

On Nov 16, 1:53 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why Paula Broadwell Sent Those EmailsIt wasn’t jealousybyJustin Raimondo, 
> November 16, 2012
> When it comes to grandstanding, few politicians can outdo SenatorsJohn McCain 
> and Lindsey Graham. A few hours before the President’s first press conference 
> since the election, this duo hadone of their own, demanding a 
> "Water-gate"-like special congressional investigation into the attack on our 
> BenghaziCIA secret prison"consulate." As ifat least threecongressional 
> committees looking into the matter isn’t enough, they want another one – just 
> to make sure it comes to the right conclusions.
> And what are those conclusions? It’s the same Fox News party line that we’ve 
> been hearing since Day One: according tothe wingnuts, the President and his 
> administration deliberately withheld military and security support from the 
> "consulate," and ordered rescue teams to stand down while Ambassador Chris 
> Stevens, and three others, were sacrificed on the altar of the President’s 
> reelection campaign.
> You may ask: why would Obama, then-CIA chief Gen. David Petraeus, and the 
> Pentagon pull such a deadly and heinous betrayal? Although it is never said 
> out loud – except bythe nuttiestof the wingnuts – the clear implication is 
> that the White House is inhabited by traitors. It all makes perfect "sense" 
> if you fervently believe the President is a secret Muslim.
> For those whose ears aren’t quite attuned to the dog whistling of the Fox 
> News/Karl Rove media combine, we haveCharles Krauthammer, who gives 
> essentially the same tired old story a conspiratorial twist (with a dash of 
> scandal): the administration, he avers, was holding the knowledge of his 
> affair with Paula Broadwell over Petraeus’s head, supposedly forcing him to 
> testify at a Sept. 13 congressionalbriefingthat the "Innocence of Muslims" 
> video was a significant factor in the Benghazi attack. Obama isn’t just a 
> secret Muslim, you see: he’s a blackmailer, too.
> It’s truly a sickening and singularly unconvincing narrative, not least 
> because these three stooges of the War Party –McCain,Graham, andKrauthammer– 
> all hailed the US intervention in Libya, while criticizing the President for 
> being too "late and slow" about it. Whenradical 
> Islamistsalliedwithal-Qaedawere installed in Tripoli and Benghazi by NATO air 
> power andmobs of howling savageson the ground, the War Party – personified by 
> this tiresome trio – were over the moon. Now they’re complaining about the 
> consequences of our great "victory" – "it’s a good day for Libya, America, 
> and the world," Krauthammer crowed at the time. But was it?
> When it comes to the Benghazi attack, all parties agree on one thing: the 
> security arrangements provided for the CIA station/consulate were 
> inadequate.Unarmed security guardsemployed by an obscure UK-based firm nobody 
> had ever heard of, and the "protection" afforded by theFebruary 17 Brigade, a 
> key militia group that led the uprising against Qaddafi in Benghazi and was 
> being "trained" by the CIA, were all the protection they had. Perhaps the 
> State Department was confident the February 17 gang would defend them if 
> attacked. The only problem was that the Brigade, itself a radical Islamist 
> outfit, did nothing while theAnsar al-Shariagroup – another, even more 
> hard-line Islamist "militia" – stormed the diplomatic compound, and, later, 
> the CIA station a mile or so away. Indeed, the consulate "guards"alerted the 
> attackersas to the whereabouts of Ambassador Stevens and his staff, who had 
> fled to the nearby CIA station after the initial assault.
> Those "guards" came from a small outfit known asBlue Mountain Security. This 
> was mainly a travel company catering to adventurous tourists until the 
> "liberation" of Libya, when they managed to get around Libyan regulations on 
> foreign security providers by partnering up with a "local" security 
> organization. Except it wasn’t at all local:the Eclipse Groupis a shadowy 
> organization run by Iran-Contra co-conspirator and neocon loonyDuane 
> Clarridge, who boasts of running his own "private" CIA. It was this group, 
> which just happened to have a license to operate in Libya, that gave Blue 
> Mountain access to the Libyan security market.
> Isn’t it funny how neocons turn up in the weirdest places? All you have to do 
> is probe a bit beneath the surface of practically any foreign policy 
> disaster, and there they are, like bugs scittering away in droves the deeper 
> one digs.
> Speaking of neocons, we nowknow the identityof the Shirtless Guy, the FBI 
> agent whose dogged pursuit of the source of those "harassing" emails led to 
> the exposure of Petraeus’s affair with Paula Broadwell and the CIA chief’s 
> downfall:"The agent, Frederick W. Humphries II, 47, is also described by 
> former colleagues as relentless in his pursuit of what he sees as wrongdoing, 
> which appears to describe his role in the F.B.I. investigation involving Mr. 
> Petraeus. Suspecting that the case involved serious security issues and was 
> being stalled, possibly for political reasons – a suspicion his superiors say 
> was unjustified – he took his concerns to Congressional Republicans.
> “Fred is a passionate kind of guy,’ one former colleague said. ‘He’s kind of 
> an obsessive type. If he locked his teeth onto something, he’d be a 
> bulldog.’"Humphries, a former Army captain and military intelligence officer, 
> is a friend of Jill Kelley, the woman whose "cyber-stalking" complaint 
> triggered the investigation that eventually uncovered the Petraeus- Broadwell 
> liaison. Hereportedlybecame so "obsessed" by the case that his superiors 
> forbade him from getting involved in it, and so he went around them: to the 
> Republicancongressionalleadership, which spilled the beans to the top guns at 
> the FBI. From there it went to DNIJames Clapper, who insisted Petraeus 
> resign. Humphries was convinced "the case was being stalled for political 
> reasons," according to theTimes: anearlierTimesaccount attributed his 
> impatience to his "worldview."
> What "worldview" is that? TheTimesdescribes his "conservative political 
> views," and a look at his background should give us a few clues.To beginwith, 
> he was instrumental in the investigation that foiled the so-called Millennium 
> terrorist plot of 1990. Current headlines describe him as a "hero." However, 
> other cases in which he figured prominently paint a definitely unheroic 
> portrait of a man consumed by hatred of Muslims. In 2007, Humphrieswent 
> afterYoussef Megahed, a USF student arrested in South Carolina while on a 
> road trip with a newly acquired friend, Ahmed Mohamed. They had been pulled 
> over for speeding and the police found suspicious items in the car: PVC pipes 
> filled with potassium nitrate. Mohamed said they were "model rockets," while 
> the government admitted they were "low explosives."
> The two were charged with illegal transportation of explosive materials and 
> possession of destructive devices, but neither was convicted on those counts. 
> However, Mohamed got a 15-year sentence for a Youtube video explaining how to 
> convert a toy car remote control device into a detonator. Megahed was 
> acquitted of all charges, but the fanatical Humphries pursued him, and hewas 
> re-arrested, this time on suspicion of posing a “terrorist” threat. "We felt 
> that Mr. Megahed was willingly providing assistance to Mr. Mohamed, who is a 
> self-professed terrorist," averred Humphries at the trial. What was the 
> evidence against Megahed? As Megahed’s lawyerput it:"The only thing the 
> government did and I think it’s important for people to understand this is 
> they put on a supervisory FBI agent who testified about what other people 
> investigated, and they put on a forensics computer examiner who basically 
> said, ‘Here’s Youssef’s history on his computer,’ without giving context to 
> either of those. And when we pointed out and were able to discuss what these 
> two witnesses the actual context of the allegations against Youssef, it 
> became crystal clear that there was nothing there. There was simply no basis 
> to the charges against Youssef."In short, Humphries’s testimony and that of 
> the "forensics expert" was pure innuendo, which is why the judge threw it out 
> and freed Megahed. This should give us some idea of the "worldview" espoused 
> by Petraeus’s pursuer.This storysays Humphries gave a talk on Afghanistan at 
> the "FBI Citizen’s Academy," and that his friend, Jill Kelley – another key 
> catalyst in the outing of Petraeus – also attended. Other news outlets 
> areclaimingthey met there for the first time. In any case, the two became 
> close – although theshirtless pictureHumphries sent her issaid to 
> benon-sexual in nature – and when Kelley started receiving anonymous emails 
> warning her to stay away from Petraeus she went to Humphries. He became 
> convinced he had uncovered a grave security threat because the emailer seemed 
> to have inside knowledge of the movements of both Petraeus and Gen. John 
> Allen, the top US commander in Afghanistan.
> Ms. Kelley is fast eclipsing Broadwell as the central player in this drama, 
> whichmanyhave compared to a soap opera but which may in fact be more akin to 
> a spy thriller.
> Kelley, 37, is married to Scott Kelley, a surgeon at a hospital in Tampa, 
> Florida: the couple lives in a $1.5 million mansion "a stone’s throw" away 
> from MacDill Air Force Base, headquarters of CENTCOM. The daughter of 
> Lebanese parents who came to the US in the 1970s "due to political 
> disputes,"according toAl Arabiya, her family is Maronite Christian. Kelley 
> wasdescribedby a onetime member of Petraeus’s staff as a "’self-appointed’ 
> go-between for Central Command officers with Lebanese and other Middle 
> Eastern government officials."
> One can’t help wondering: which Middle Eastern governments?
> Kelley and her husband moved to Tampa a decade ago, and she soon became the 
> center of asocial whirlwindinvolving top CENTCOM officers, including Petraeus 
> and Allen. Famous for herlavish parties, with white tents on her manicured 
> lawn and valet parking, she was known as the unofficial "social liaison" for 
> MacDill and the surrounding community. (Although if you were anything less 
> than a colonel, you could forget about getting an invite to one of her 
> sparkling galas). She worked hard at becoming a fixture, even getting a 
> special pass to MacDill which allowed her to breeze in and out: the pass, as 
> you might imagine, has since beenrevoked.
> A sumptuous mansion, a Mercedes and a BMG in the driveway, a reputation as a 
> socialite with rather expensive tastes – these insignia of wealth hid a 
> miasma of debt, foreclosures, and creditor lawsuits that belied the glossy 
> surface of her life. AsUSA Todayreports:"The $2.1 million purchase of a 
> three-story office building downtown ended in foreclosure. The couple 
> defaulted on a $250,000 line of credit and owe thousands on credit cards.
> "Chase Bank sued for $25,880 in 2010.
> "FIA Card Services sued in February for $79,876, including more than $75,000 
> in cash advances on a Visa Signature card.
> "Regions Bank sued in August 2010 after the Kelleys failed to make payments 
> on $250,000 borrowed July 19, 2005. The bank ultimately settled for $85,000 
> and required the Kelleys to pay $850 a month toward the debt."There was also 
> a seeminglydubious cancer charityrun by Jill and her husband, which also 
> lists her twin sister, Natalie, as an officer. Almost half the money raised 
> went to expenses: no one knows where the other half went. More recently, 
> Kelley attended the Tampa GOP convention, where she met a New York City 
> businessman who was convinced by her that she could get him a no bid coal 
> gasification contract with the South Korean government: the hook was 
> herrelationshipwith Petraeus, which she said would guarantee the contract. He 
> flew her to New York to discuss the details, but soon discovered she had no 
> idea what she was talking about after she demanded an$80 millionpayment.
> SisterNatalie Khawamis alsoquite the card: police records indicate at least 
> half a dozen calls from Ms. Khawam concerning alleged prowlers, unwanted 
> visits from supposed agents of her ex-boyfriend, and other domestic dramas. 
> The boyfriendmay beherex-husband, or perhaps lobbyistGerald Harrington, a 
> bigtime Democratic party contributor and military lobbyist associated with 
> Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and John Kerry. Khazam’s bankruptcy 
> records indicate Harrington "loaned" her $300,000. In another weird twist, 
> both Petraeus and Allen intervened in a child custody case involving Khawam 
> and her ex-husband: both sent letters to the judge praising her to the skies. 
> However, as theTampa Bay Timesput it:"The court had a different opinion. ‘Ms. 
> Khawam appears to lack any appreciation or respect for the importance of 
> honesty and integrity in her interactions with her family, employers, and 
> others with whom she comes in contact,’ a judge wrote after a litany of 
> hearings and psychological evaluations. ‘The court fully expects that Ms. 
> Khawam’s pattern of misrepresentations about virtually everything, including 
> the most important aspects of her life, will continue indefinitely.’"Harsh!
> Millions of dollars in debt, Khazam moved into the Tampa Bay mansion with her 
> sister. The two made a formidable team as they carved out a niche at the 
> intersection of Tampa’s social elite and MacDill’s military brass. 
> Kelley,saystheTampa Bay Times, was "determined to make her footprint" after 
> moving to Tampa in 2003, and was apparently very clear on setting up shop as 
> close to MacDill as possible. She "knocked on doors up and down Bayshore 
> Boulevard, asking homeowners if their house was for sale. She wanted the 
> prestigious address, and she got it. In June 2004, the couple paid $1.5 
> million for a 4,800-square-foot brick mansion with stately white pillars and 
> a view of Hillsborough Bay, just six miles from MacDill Air Force Base."
> They became renown for the untrammeled extravagance of their parties, where 
> "there was always more than anybody could possibly eat," according to one 
> guest. Behind the façade of wealth and self-assurance, however, the sisters 
> were slowly sinking into an ocean of debt and accompanying litigation.
> When we put what we know about the Kelley household together, we come up with 
> a clear pattern and set of motivations pointing to an ulterior motive behind 
> all this frenetic socializing and status-seeking:
> 1) To say they were living beyond their means is a bit of an understatement: 
> saddled with anenormous debt– the mortgage on their house was inserious 
> arrears– one has to wonder where they got all the money for this constant 
> round of entertaining.
> 2) Jill Kelley made a "determined" effort to buy a house at a prestigious 
> address minutes away from MacDill. She was very specific about where she 
> wanted to live, almost as if she were setting up a "scene" – but to what 
> purpose?
> 3) Kelley waged an aggressive campaign to embed herself and her family into 
> the social life of MacDill,cultivatingtop-ranking officers such as Petraeus 
> and Allen, continuing her relationship with these two after they left the 
> area. At every charity event, every "outreach" effort by MacDill to the local 
> community,there she was, right in the center of things. Her whole life 
> revolved around these activities: it was, in effect, her job.
> 4) As Petraeus’sformer staff memberphrases her job description, she was a 
> "’self-appointed’ go-between for Central Command officers with Lebanese and 
> other Middle Eastern government officials."
> Lebanon’s Christian Maronite community has along historyof persecution at the 
> hands of Muslim radicals, and also one of political extremism in their own 
> ranks. The violently anti-Muslim Phalangist movement, which engaged in 
> several massacres, has its base in the Maronite community: they were the main 
> pogromists atSabra and Shatilla. Allied with the Israelis, the Maronites 
> fought – and continue to fight – against the Muslim majority: the links 
> between the Phalangists and other Christian extremist groups and Israeli 
> intelligence iswell-documented.
> Enter FBI agent and anti-Muslim fanatic Humphries, on a crusade to save the 
> West from infiltration, whobelievedthe investigation into the "harassing" 
> emails was being suppressed by the Obama administration, and you have all the 
> ingredients of a political and ideological vendetta aimed at bringing down 
> not only Petraeus but alsoThat Secret Muslimin the White House.
> A whole section of the loony-tunes right-wing in this country fervently 
> believes the US government has beeninfiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood. And 
> their paranoia is completely nonpartisan:Frank Gaffney, of the vehemently 
> pro-Israel Center for Security Policy, and the equally nutty and volubleDavid 
> Horowitz– former New Leftist Black Panther groupie – turned right-wing 
> conspiracy theorist – have both been pushing for years the crazy notion that 
> theBushadministration was infested with Muslim fifth columnists. Their prime 
> target: none other thanGrover Norquist, the libertarian anti-tax advocate who 
> is married to a Palestinian woman, and, among his other subversive 
> activities, helped found a free market institute aimed at the Islamic world.
> If Humphries’s "worldview" was similar to or even shaped by these nutballs, 
> then his actions make perfect "sense": after all, the investigation into the 
> emails was faltering, in his view, and what else could it be but those evil 
> fifth columnists who had squelched the probe? Yet he wasn’t going to relent: 
> this one wasn’t going to get away like Megahed did. He would go over their 
> heads, expose the terrorist conspiracy, and – as in the Millennium case – be 
> hailed as a hero.
> However, instead of going to the Justice Department, or the chair of a 
> congressional intelligence committee, he turned to the Republicans, and 
> specifically House majority leader Rep.Eric Cantor. It was the tag team of 
> Humphries, Kelley, and Cantor who revealed Petraeus’s secret to the world – 
> although Kelley didn’t count on the FBI going into her emails and there 
> discoveringhundreds of pagesof email between her and Gen. Allen.
> Which leads us to the question: why did Broadwell send the harassing 
> emails,warning Allen off of Kelleyand telling the latter toback offfrom 
> Petraeus? The sex-obsessed American media is naturally focusing on the 
> salacious aspects of L’affaire Petraeus, but the reality is that neither 
> Petraeus nor Allen was likely romantically involved with the Lebanese 
> spitfire. I would suggest it wasn’t jealousy that motivated Broadwell, it was 
> a desire to protect her lover – and Gen. Allen – from falling into a trap: 
> instead, she set if off by her actions. This wasn’t a love triangle – it was 
> a failed counterintelligence operation, and the end of a tragic love story in 
> which the beloved was unknowingly betrayed by her lover.
> We are now being treated to the spectacle of the whole "anti-terrorist" 
> wingnut media machine pumping outthe narrativeof a craven and traitorous 
> White House supposedly covering up the "real" story of what happened in 
> Benghazi. In typical neocon style, this narrative – summed up by 
> Krauthammer’s "blackmail" thesis – is not only a lie, it is the exact 
> opposite of the truth. Far from being blackmailed by the administration, 
> Petraeus was set up and hung out to dry by a murky cabal on the other end of 
> the political spectrum.
> I would note that at both ends of the twin scandals roiling official 
> Washington – Benghazi and the Petraeus affair – we find similar catalytic 
> elements of a definitely neoconnish complexion. Atthe Benghazi end, we have 
> the Blue Mountain/Eclipse Group/Duane Clarridge connection, and on the 
> Petreaus side we have the Humphries/Kelley/Cantor cabal, with hints of 
> involvement by a certain "Middle Eastern government" thrown in for good 
> measure.
> Is that a coincidence, or 
> what?http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/11/15/why-paula-broadwell-sent-those-emails/

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to