Is that in response to the Death Star question???

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> **
>    Scotty Starnes posted: " They know they're about to get swamped with
> petitions after Obama's executive order frenzy. WhiteHouse.gov: When we
> launched We the People, none of us knew how popular it would be, but it's
> exceeded our wildest expectations. Through the past year,"    Respond to
> this post by replying above this line
>       New post on *Scotty Starnes's Blog*
> <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/>  White House
> Changes the Number of Signatures Needed to Get a White House Response
> on 
> Petitions<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/white-house-changes-the-number-of-signatures-needed-to-get-a-white-house-response-on-petitions/>
>  by
> Scotty Starnes <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/>
>
> [image: 
> White-House-Petition]<http://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/white-house-petition.jpg>
>
> They know they're about to get swamped with petitions after Obama's
> executive order frenzy.
>
> WhiteHouse.gov<http://m.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/01/15/why-we-re-raising-signature-threshold-we-people>
> :
>
> When we launched We the People <https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/>, none
> of us knew how popular it would be, but it's exceeded our wildest
> expectations. Through the past year, interest in We the People exploded and
> we're closing in on 10 million signatures.
>
> When we first raised the threshold — from 5,000 to 25,000 — we called it "a
> good problem to 
> have<http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/10/03/good-problem-have-raising-signature-threshold-white-house-petitions>."
> Turns out that "good problem" is only getting better, so we're making
> another adjustment to ensure we’re able to continue to give the most
> popular ideas the time they deserve.
>
> Starting today, as we move into a second term, petitions must receive
> 100,000 signatures in 30 days in order to receive an official response from
> the Obama Administration. This new threshold applies only to petitions
> created from this point forward and is not retroactively applied to ones
> that already exist.
>
> In the last two months of 2012, use of We the People more than doubled. In
> just that time roughly 2.4 million new users joined the system, 73,000
> petitions were created and 4.9 million signatures were registered.
>
> As we’ve seen overall use skyrocket, more petitions are crossing the
> threshold — and doing so much more quickly.
>
> Continue 
> reading>>><http://m.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/01/15/why-we-re-raising-signature-threshold-we-people>
>   *Scotty Starnes<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/>
> * | January 17, 2013 at 8:30 AM | Tags: 
> petition<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=petition>,
> President Obama <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=president-obama>,
> signatures <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=signatures>, We the
> People <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=we-the-people>, White
> House <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=white-house> | Categories: 
> Political
> Issues <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?cat=35145> | URL:
> http://wp.me/pvnFC-9CE
>
>  
> Comment<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/white-house-changes-the-number-of-signatures-needed-to-get-a-white-house-response-on-petitions/#respond>
>    See all 
> comments<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/white-house-changes-the-number-of-signatures-needed-to-get-a-white-house-response-on-petitions/#comments>
>
>      Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage 
> Subscriptions<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf&email=goosepickles%40gmail.com>.
>
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
>
> http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/white-house-changes-the-number-of-signatures-needed-to-get-a-white-house-response-on-petitions/
>          Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com>
>
>
>  --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>



-- 
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to