Progressives Believe in Money Magic
by Sheldon Richman April 2, 2013
It’s hard to believe that in the 21st century, educated people believe the government can produce real wealth by creating money. It’s especially ironic that the main preachers of this superstition fancy themselves progressives and are the first to accuse their opponents of being against science. What could be more antiscience than the alchemic proposal to create wealth by having the Federal Reserve make entries in a digital ledger? It’s more absurd than alchemy: Alchemists claimed they could turn base metals into gold. Inflationists require only thin air.
The commonsense reaction is: “Balderdash!” So it takes real devotion to the power of government to embrace such a ridiculous idea. Consider Chris Hayes, the MSNBC host. Last Saturday on his program, Up, he said this in introducing a segment on the proposal that the Treasury mint a $1 trillion coin to get around its debt limit:
- The simple truth is it [the government] creates money simply out of
thin air. Someone at the Federal Reserve punches in a number on a
spreadsheet and voila! more money.… While there are rules that guide
legal tender, at base, what makes money valuable is simply social
convention, a norm. We all agree it’s valuable, so it’s valuable. The
genius of the trillion dollar coin isn’t just that it provides some much
needed leverage against a foe unencumbered by any sense of propriety, it
also illustrates the uncomfortable, foundational reality of modern
capitalism: money is nothing more than a shared illusion.
- It’s a kind of magic. But is it good magic … or bad magic?
- It’s a kind of magic. But is it good magic … or bad magic?
The value of money is a convention, a norm, a shared illusion? Did society agree that the dollar should lose 95 percent of its purchasing power since the Federal Reserve opened its doors nearly a hundred years ago?
This view is as unscientific as one can imagine. The science it rejects is economics. Beginning with Adam Smith (actually well before that), the most enlightened thinkers understood that economic regularities exist apart from human will; they are forces, or “laws,” generated by intrinsic features of human action, particularly exchange. It is not a social convention that, for example, when the supply of a good increases relative to demand (other things equal), the price falls, and vice versa. Nor is it a convention that when demand for a good rises relative to supply (other things equal), the price increases. It is the result of the “logic of choice,” which has been the “mainline” of economic thinking for hundreds of years, Peter Boettke writes in his new book, Living Economics.
To hold otherwise is to believe that a society could have generated other norms, under which, say, a fall in supply relative to demand caused prices to drop, or a fall in demand relative to supply caused prices to rise. But it is not by social agreement that those things never happen. As the great Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises wrote,
- The development of economics … did more to transform human thinking
than any other scientific theory before or since. Up to that time it had
been believed that no bounds other than those drawn by the laws of nature
circumscribed the path of acting man. It was not known that there is
still something more that sets a limit to political power beyond which it
cannot go. Now it was learned that in the social realm too there is
something operative which power and force are unable to alter and to
which they must adjust themselves if they hope to achieve success, in
precisely the same way as they must take into account the laws of
nature.
http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/progressives-money-magic/ --
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
