Obama's Plan for A Socialist One Party State --- Most minorities, including blacks, jews and hispanics, favor socialism. They love to take and spend our tax dollars.
On Apr 17, 10:57 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > April 16, 2013 **** > > *President Obama's Plan for A Socialist One Party State* > > *By* *Peter Ferrara* <http://www.americanthinker.com/peter_ferrara/>**** > > The last check and balance on President Obama is the Republican majority in > the House of Representatives. He has made clear that he intends to remove > that check on his power in the 2014 elections.**** > > Our Founding Fathers wisely provided for a free and independent press as an > additional check on government power. But the *New York Times, the > Washington Post, *NBC, CBS and ABC decided they had a better idea. They > concluded that it is more important to behave voluntarily like the old > Soviet press did under government compulsion, when the socialist party is > in power.**** > > Of course, we do still have the freedom in America for now for the > alternative media -- talk radio, Fox News, the *Wall Street Journal *editorial > page, conservative websites, blogs and a few other media outlets - to air > criticism of the reigning socialist regime. But 50% of the country is > ensconced in urban enclaves where listening to or reading views that are > not friendly to socialist rule is considered socially unacceptable > behavior. So, no alternative views, or checks on the reigning regime, ever > break through there. That explains why our once grand, world-leading > democracy has now been rendered dysfunctional.**** > > An independent judiciary is also supposed to be a check and balance on the > abuse of government power. But as his second term drags on, President Obama > will have appointed more and more, and eventually a majority of, all > federal judges.**** > > Moreover, these won't just be any judges but liberal judges chosen with a > liberal judicial philosophy that their job is not to follow the law, but to > do what they think is right, regardless of the law. What is "right" is > going to be Obama's liberal/left agenda. **** > > Holding the line even right now are only five rapidly aging old men on the > Supreme Court. Replacing even one of them with a liberal appointee will > mean the end of the Reagan majority on the Court. Everything in our society > will then change. Gun rights and the Second Amendment, gone in a heartbeat. > Property rights and the rule of law, forget about it. Religious freedom? > Only for the socialist religion.**** > > These will be replaced by a constitutional right to welfare, and to your > money. By gay marriage. And by a right to free contraceptives for everyone, > so America can party on right through its decline, just like in Europe.**** > > *The Second Mid-Term Hex HeHexz***** > > The second mid-term election of a two term incumbent President, as in 2014, > has historically been a disaster for the party of the incumbent President. > It was so even for Franklin Roosevelt in 1938. It was so for the war hero > Dwight Eisenhower in 1958. Counting Kennedy/Johnson as one Administration, > it was true for them as well in 1966. And it was so even for Ronald Reagan, > even in the midst of an historic recovery, when the Republicans lost > control of the Senate, and even more ground in the Democrat majority House, > in 1986. **** > > As University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato and Kyle Kondik > write in the March 19 *Wall Street Journal*,**** > > "Since the start of the modern two-party system in the mid-19th century, > the party of an incumbent president has never captured control of the House > from the other party in a mid-term election. While many presidents have > held the House for their party, in 35 of 38 midterms since the Civil War > the incumbent's party has lost ground."**** > > And that is in any mid-term, not just in the more onerous second mid-terms.* > *** > > But President Obama has decided to defy that history. He has decided not to > try to govern with the Republican House majority, but to devote the next 18 > months to political posturing and framing the issues so negatively against > the Republicans that America would rally to give Obama total control of the > government in November 2014, with a restored Democrat majority in the House > as well, leaving no check on Obama's power at all. **** > > That is because President Obama's goal is the radical transformation of > America from the world's leading capitalist state, the freest, most > prosperous, and mightiest in history, into just another socialist third > world country. But he knows he can't do that with the Republican House > majority elected in 2010 precisely to stop his socialist agenda. For that > radical, socialist transformation, reflecting what the Democratic Party and > their party controlled media lapdogs are really all about, he needs total > control of Congress. For that he needs, effectively, a socialist, one-party > state, which is actually what he is after in defying history, and seeking a > restored Democrat House majority.**** > > *Organizing for Action***** > > This is what Obama's new 501(c)(4) organization, Organizing for Action, is > all about. He has transformed his campaign into that organization, giving > it the advanced social media technology, contact lists, and grassroots > infrastructure of the campaign. Jason Stverak, President of the Franklin > Center for Government and Public Integrity, writes in the March 15 *Washington > Times*, "Organizing for Action is flooding the airwaves with advertisements > praising the Obama Administration's policies, and viewers at home are being > inundated with just as many talking points and political attacks as they > were during the 2012 campaign."**** > > Through that organization, Obama has begun an unprecedented fundraising > crusade to raise $50 million to be spent in Republican districts to > discredit Congressional Republican incumbents. But as a 501(c)(4) social > activist organization, Organizing for Action is not subject to campaign > financing limits. For half a million in contributions, donors get private > meetings with Obama where they can lobby for their personal agendas, crony > capitalist favoritism, and other special interest pleading.**** > > This is going to be the ugliest smear campaign in American political > history, similar to what we saw in 2012, where the President's campaign > made up Romney's positions and then campaigned against their own strawmen. > Such as the charges that Romney was proposing middle class tax increases, > or that he wanted to ban contraceptives. When the real Romney showed up > during the first debate to say that those were not his positions, Obama > partisans responded that he must be lying.**** > > It is up to conservative activists to respond to this with truth squads to > counter and reveal the propaganda. This is not going to be primarily about > Republicans, but about preserving the credibility of the conservative > philosophy, which is actually what is going to be under attack. Witness the > current liberal/left Democrat campaign for gun control and gay marriage. We > need to preserve, protect and defend the Reagan economic record, for > example. We need to explain the root government causes of the financial > crisis, and advocate reforms so it will never happen again. In addition to > tax reform, spending control, and entitlement reforms, that would involve > monetary reform, so America can once again enjoy a dollar as good as gold. * > *** > > We also need to promote and defend the national defense doctrine of peace > through strength. And we need to more than redouble a positive vision of > religious freedom and pro-family values. **** > > *The High Stakes Gamble***** > > In defying the long term political trends, President Obama is engaged in a > high stakes political gamble, putting his own political credibility on the > line. If Obama breaks the historical pattern, and the Democrats take the > House, then Obama will be the new Hugo Chavez, in effective authoritarian > control of America.**** > > But if the historical patterns hold, and instead of the Democrats taking > back the House, the Republicans take back the Senate, then President Obama > will be a politically discredited lame duck, facing an entirely Republican > controlled Congress. His socialist transformation of America will be over > and exposed.**** > > Prospects are actually quite good for the Republicans to take over Senate > control. Besides the historical trends, Sabato and Kondik further explain,** > ** > > "Democrats are defending seats in seven states that Mitt Romney won in last > year's Presidential race: Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Montana, North > Carolina, South Dakota, and West Virginia. Mr. Obama won an average of just > 40.5% of the vote in these states. In addition, the retirements of longtime > Sens. Tom Harkin (D. Iowa) and Carl Levin (D., Mich.) make those previously > safe seats much more competitive. Factor in some freshman Democratic > Senators elected from swing states in Obama's 2008 wave (the last time this > batch of seats was contested), and Republicans could run competitive > challenges in 10 or more Democrat-held seats. Incompetent GOP nominees > could change the picture, but almost all of the seats that Republicans are > defending are in solid-red states."**** > > The Bible says, "By their fruits ye shall know them." Adding to GOP > prospects for next year are Obama chickens coming home to roost. Obamacare > will be creating chaos in health care next year, with tens of millions > losing their employer provided health insurance. Health insurance premiums > will be soaring, to double or more for many, particularly young adults. The > negative market reaction to those increases will be causing health insurers > to collapse and go out of business, resulting in still more government > takeover of health care. **** > > Millions will lose their jobs as employers seek to downsize and break up to > avoid the economically fatal costs of Obamacare. Millions of others will be > reduced to part time workers for the same reason. That will mean further > declining real wages and incomes for working people and the middle class, > with poverty soaring still higher.**** > > If the Obama economy falls back into recession in the second term, as Obama > deserves, it will be the Democratic Party that will be on the verge of > extinction. Unemployment would explode into double digits, and deficits > would soar to over $2 trillion.**** > > And then there will be a new front regarding chaos in foreign policy. Iran > is likely to break out as a nuclear power before the mid-terms, which may > mean nuclear war in the Middle East. At best, it would mean nuclear > proliferation efforts spreading to Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt and other > Middle Eastern nations. North Korea's nuclear breakout would extend that to > Japan, South Korea, and maybe Australia (especially as the American nuclear > umbrella fades under Obama policies). The formerly progressive citadels of > San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle will have new reasons to begin to > question Obama's foolish national defense policies. **** > > In my opinion, Obama is primarily motivated by ideology and power, and not > by the trappings of office. I predict that if we aggressively advance the > conservative philosophy over the next two years, do our job in the midterms > (electing not just Republicans, but true Tea Party Republicans), and make > the historical patterns stick, Obama won't want to be a time server for the > last two years, battling Republicans with no ability to advance his > socialist agenda. **** > > I predict in that case, Obama will resign, ending the Marxist assault on > America as a failure. He will let Biden run for reelection as an incumbent, > with Hillary on the ticket. Then it will be time for the rest of us to > clean house, everywhere Marxists have already infiltrated American society > and culture, from the Democrat Party controlled media, to Hollywood, to > "academic" cloisters of taxpayer financed Marxism.**** > > If this generation of Americans cannot rise to defend traditional American > freedom and prosperity, we will lose both. And deserve to.**** > > *Peter Ferrara is Director of Entitlement and Budget Policy for the > Heartland Institute, Senior Fellow for the National Center for Policy > Analysis, Senior Advisor on Entitlement Reform and the Budget for the > National Tax Limitation Foundation, and General Counsel for the American > Civil Rights Union. He served in the White House Office of Policy > Development under President Reagan, and as Associate Deputy Attorney > General of the United States under President George H.W. Bush.***** > > *Page Printed > from:http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2013/04/president_obamas_p... > * at April 16, 2013 - 05:05:34 PM CDT**** -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
