I got a kick out of the following comment I read on CNN's website. Up to
now, almost 2500 viewers "liked" this comment (i.e. rated it positively),
while just 250 "disliked" it. Since CNN is usually watched by people on the
left, it's very telling that an anti-gun control comment like this one
received so many "likes."****


****

*Darwin* <http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html>
 
SickOfTheStupid<http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html#comment-865950016>
 * 9 hours 
ago<http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html#comment-865953019>
****

**·         ***-*<http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html>
****

**·         **** **

Which brings us to the REAL issue. In the WRONG HANDS these things can be
EXTREMELY DANGEROUS and we as a society simply cannot afford to have
pressure cookers out there that are completely uncontrolled. We are talking
about some common sense laws. First, most people do not need high capacity
pressure cookers. Limiting pressure cookers to a quart will make society
safer. In addition, with all the documented instances of pressure cookers
being used to construct explosive devices, and in light of the numbers of
killed and injured, two things are clear: pressure cookers are lethal and
we are in the midst of a pressure cooker violence epidemic. There is no
need for pressure cooker nuts to run around with their pressure cookers
without any regulation and oversight. Mandatory mental health evaluations
and federal background checks will help to ensure that a pressure cooker
doesn't fall in the wrong hands. Should people convicted of felonies and
domestic violence misdemeanors be banned from owning pressure cookers?
ABSOLUTELY! Even if it saves just one life, it's worth it. How about that
soccer mom? Well, it depends. What if she loves soccer but hates America?
Do you REALLY want THAT soccer mom to have unfettered access to something
so potentially deadly?****

·  ·  2492  <http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html>
250
****

·  *****

·  Reply <http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/17/us/boston-blasts/index.html> ***
*

·  *****

·  Share ****

** **

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to