They blatantly walk back across without issue. Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 25, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Brian Bednarek <[email protected]> wrote: > But hasn't the current administration sent more illegals back than any > previous??? > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2013/04/judge-to-obama-you-must-deport-illegal.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YidWithLid+%28YID+With+LID%29 >> >> or http://tinyurl.com/a5fnlw5 >> >> Judge to Obama- You MUST Deport Illegal Immigrants >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Chalk up one for Justice and the Constitution! A federal Judge in Texas told >> the Obama administration that they did NOT have the discretion to pick and >> choose which laws to enforce. They must deport illegal immigrants...er... >> criminally trespassing aliens. The lawsuit was brought by Ice Agents who >> felt their lives were being put in danger because they were not being >> allowed to do their jobs. >> >> This was not a final decision, the Judge ruled that the court challenge by >> federal immigration agents seeking to block President Barack Obama’s >> deferred-deportation initiative will probably succeed. >> >> The deferred-deportation program was the President's attempt to create a >> "dream act" by executive fiat after it was rejected by Congress. >> >> Judge Reed O’Connor in Dallas put off his own decision on whether to grant >> the request for a preliminary injunction by 10 U.S. Immigration and Customs >> agents because he requited additional information. >> >> Announced by Obama and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano last >> year, the directive gives agents the ability to defer action on people >> unlawfully in the U.S. if they came to the country under the age of 16, are >> in school or have obtained a high school diploma, haven’t been convicted of >> a felony, significant misdemeanor or multiple misdemeanors, and aren’t a >> threat to public safety or national security. >> >> “The court finds that DHS does not have discretion to refuse to initiate >> removal proceedings” when the requirements for deportation under a federal >> statute are met, O’Connor said today in a 38-page decision, referring to the >> Department of Homeland Security. >> >> Still, the judge said he can’t decide the case based on the arguments he’s >> heard so far. >> >> “Accordingly, the court hereby defers ruling on the plaintiffs’ application >> for preliminary injunction until the parties have submitted additional >> briefing,” O’Connor said. >> >> According to the president's attorney, this was nothing but a dispute >> between employers and employees. >> >> Adam Kirschner, a lawyer for the Justice Department, told O’Connor at the >> hearing the case was, in reality, an employment dispute and that the agents >> can’t demonstrate they’ve been harmed. “These agents do not like the way the >> agency has prioritized the use of its resources,” he said. >> >> “The executive cannot remove 11 million people,” Kirchner said of the branch >> of the U.S. government led by Obama. “The executive has authority to >> exercise its discretion.” >> >> If Mr. Kirchner had read the constitution lately perhaps he would >> understand that the congress passes laws and the executive is supposed to >> implement them. It is not within his power to decide which laws to >> implement and which to ignore. Just as it is not within the powers of the >> citizens to decide which laws to follow and which to break. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> > > > > -- > brine > http://brineb.blogspot.com/ > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
