** **

  ****

Has anyone noticed that the colorful articulate V.P. Joseph Robinette
Biden, Jr. has been muzzled by BHO and hasn't been seen or heard from in
months? Should Valerie Jarret, Senior Adviser to BHO for Public Engagement
and Intergovernmental Affairs, receive a subpoena to appear before Congress
would she also take the 5th? And then there is the buffoon Press Secretary
Jay Carney (think the three monkeys). The BHO administration is starting
to  leak oil. It doesn't matter when he wants to change the subject, away
from the myriad of scandals, those embarrassments keep licking at his
heels. Time will tell if the wheels will start to come off. Stay tuned... **
**

  *This Is No Ordinary Scandal* ****

*Peggy Noonan</span>*****

The Wall Street Journal - May 18, 2013****

 ****

We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate. The
reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from
sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous.
No one likes what they're seeing. The Justice Department assault on the
Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue
Service have left the administration's credibility deeply, probably
irretrievably damaged. They don't look jerky now, they look dirty. The
patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed is gone.****

 ****

Something big has shifted. The standing of the administration has changed.**
**

 ****

As always it comes down to trust. Do you trust the president's answers when
he's pressed on an uncomfortable story? Do you trust his people to be sober
and fair-minded as they go about their work? Do you trust the IRS and the
Justice Department? You do not.****

 ****

The president, as usual, acts as if all of this is totally unconnected to
him. He's shocked, it's unacceptable, he'll get to the bottom of it. He
read about it in the papers, just like you.****

 ****

But he is not unconnected, he is not a bystander. This is his
administration. Those are his executive agencies. He runs the IRS and the
Justice Department.****

 ****

A president sets a mood, a tone. He establishes an atmosphere. If he is
arrogant, arrogance spreads. If he is too partisan, too disrespecting of
political adversaries, that spreads too. Presidents always undo themselves
and then blame it on the third guy in the last row in the sleepy agency
across town.****

 ****

The IRS scandal has two parts. The first is the obviously deliberate and
targeted abuse, harassment and attempted suppression of conservative
groups. The second is the auditing of the taxes of political activists.****

 ****

In order to suppress conservative groups—at first those with words like
"Tea Party" and "Patriot" in their names, then including those that opposed
ObamaCare or advanced the Second Amendment—the IRS demanded donor rolls,
membership lists, data on all contributions, names of volunteers, the
contents of all speeches made by members, Facebook posts, minutes of all
meetings, and copies of all materials handed out at gatherings. Among its
questions: What are you thinking about? Did you ever think of running for
office? Do you ever contact political figures? What are you reading? One
group sent what it was reading: the U.S. Constitution.****

 ****

The second part of the scandal is the auditing of political activists who
have opposed the administration. The Journal's Kim Strassel reported an
Idaho businessman named Frank VanderSloot, who'd donated more than a
million dollars to groups supporting Mitt Romney. He found himself last
June, for the first time in 30 years, the target of IRS auditors. His wife
and his business were also soon audited. Hal Scherz, a Georgia physician,
also came to the government's attention. He told ABC News: "It is odd that
nothing changed on my tax return and I was never audited until I publicly
criticized ObamaCare."****

 ****

Franklin Graham, son of Billy, told Politico he believes his father was
targeted. A conservative Catholic academic who has written for these pages
faced questions about her meager freelance writing income. Many of these
stories will come out, but not as many as there are. People are not only
afraid of being audited, they're afraid of saying they were audited.****

 ****

All of these IRS actions took place in the years leading up to the 2012
election. They constitute the use of governmental power to intrude on the
privacy and shackle the political freedom of American citizens. The
purpose, obviously, was to overwhelm and intimidate—to kill the opposition,
question by question and audit by audit.****

 ****

It is not even remotely possible that all this was an accident, a mistake.
Again, only conservative groups were targeted, not liberal. It is not even
remotely possible that only one IRS office was involved.****

 ****

Lois Lerner, who oversees tax-exempt groups for the IRS, was the person who
finally acknowledged, under pressure of a looming investigative report,
some of what the IRS was doing. She told reporters the actions were the
work of "frontline people" in Cincinnati. But other offices were involved,
including Washington. It is not even remotely possible the actions were the
work of just a few agents. This was more systemic. It was an operation. The
word was out: Get the Democratic Party's foes. It is not remotely possible
nobody in the IRS knew what was going on until very recently. The
Washington Post reported efforts to target the conservative groups reached
the highest levels of the agency by May 2012—far earlier than the agency
had acknowledged. Reuters reported high-level IRS officials, including its
chief counsel, knew in August 2011 about the targeting.****

 ****

The White House is reported to be shellshocked at public reaction to the
scandal. But why? Were they so highhanded, so essentially ignorant, that
they didn't understand what it would mean to the American people when their
IRS—the revenue-collecting arm of the U.S. government—is revealed as a low,
ugly and bullying tool of the reigning powers? If they didn't know how
Americans would react to that, what did they know? I mean beyond Harvey
Weinstein's cellphone number.****

 ****

And why—in the matters of the Associated Press and Benghazi too—does no one
in this administration ever take responsibility? Attorney General Eric
Holder doesn't know what happened, exactly who did what. The president
speaks in the passive voice. He attempts to act out indignation, but he
always seems indignant at only one thing: that he's being questioned at
all. That he has to address this. That fate put it on his plate.****

 ****

We all have our biases. Mine is for a federal government that, for all the
partisan shootouts on the streets of Washington, is allowed to go about its
work. That it not be distracted by scandal, that political disagreement be,
in the end, subsumed to the common good. It is a dangerous world:
Calculating people wish to do us harm. In this world no draining,
unproductive scandals should dominate the government's life. Independent
counsels should not often come in and distract the U.S. government from its
essential business.****

 ****

But that bias does not fit these circumstances.****

 ****

What happened at the IRS is the government's essential business. The IRS
case deserves and calls out for an independent counsel, fully armed with
all that position's powers. Only then will stables that badly need to be
cleaned, be cleaned. Everyone involved in this abuse of power should pay a
price, because if they don't, the politicization of the IRS will
continue—forever. If it is not stopped now, it will never stop. And if it
isn't stopped, no one will ever respect or have even minimal faith in the
revenue-gathering arm of the U.S. government again.****

 ****

And it would be shameful and shallow for any Republican operative or
operator to make this scandal into a commercial and turn it into a mere
partisan arguing point and part of the game. It's not part of the game.
This is not about the usual partisan slugfest. This is about the integrity
of our system of government and our ability to trust, which is to say our
ability to function.****

 ****

*A version of this article appeared May 18, 2013, on page A15 in the U.S.
edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: This Is No Ordinary
Scandal.*****

 ****

 ****

 ****

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to