I am really curious as to your opinion here.
---
the government cannot constitutionally punish abstract advocacy of
force
or law violation.

example:
I think the US government and the federal reserve should be dismantled
and stripped of zionists asap by any means necessary.

On May 31, 7:35 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> And I would like you to think about this before responding Plain Ol'.....I
> know I give you, and MJ a lot of grief on here,  (sometimes just to talk
> smack!)  but I am really curious as to your opinion here.   Obviously,  I
> have a very strong personal opinion here, what with my
> J.D./legal background,  and although I am not a bar numbered attorney,  I
> sometimes think this influences me.
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:14 PM, plainolamerican
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >  the Obama Justice Department warns against using social
> > media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims,
> > threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights. "
> > ---
> > As of 2011, the Brandenburg test is still the standard used for
> > evaluating attempts to punish inflammatory speech, and it has not been
> > seriously challenged since it was laid down in 1969. Very few cases
> > have actually reached the Court during the past decades that would
> > test the outer limits of Brandenburg, so the test remains largely
> > unqualified.
>
> > The U.S. Supreme Court reversed Brandenburg's conviction, holding that
> > government cannot constitutionally punish abstract advocacy of force
> > or law violation. The majority opinion was per curiam (issued from the
> > Court as an institution rather than as authored and signed by an
> > individual justice). The earlier draft had originally been prepared by
> > Justice Abe Fortas before he was forced to resign in the midst of an
> > ethics scandal, and would have included a modified version of the
> > clear and present danger test.
>
> > On May 31, 1:24 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > And I can do with a figure of Ol' Mo the Ham Head and call it either art
> > or
> > > shit.
>
> > > **
> > >    BareNakedIslam posted: "In its latest effort to protect followers of
> > > Islam in the U.S., the Obama Justice Department warns against using
> > social
> > > media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims,
> > > threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights. "
> > >       New post on *BARE NAKED ISLAM*
> > > <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>  Yes, but you can still dunk a
> > > crucifix in a jar of urine and have it considered
> > > “art”<
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...>
> > > by
> > > BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>
>
> > > In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S., the Obama
> > > Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information
> > > considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could
> > > constitute a violation of civil rights. By "spreading information
> > > considered inflammatory against Muslims" - even if it's true - you could
> > > violate the civil […]
>
> > > Read more of this
> > > post<
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...>
> > >   *BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>* | May 31,
> > 2013
> > > at 2:12 pm | Categories:
> > > EnemyWithin-American<
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/?taxonomy=category&term=enemywithin-ame...>|
> > > URL:http://wp.me/p276zM-U9G
>
> > >  Comment<
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...>
> > >    See all comments<
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...>
>
> > >      Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> > > Subscriptions<
> >https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf...>.
>
> > > *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to [email protected].
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to