I am really curious as to your opinion here. --- the government cannot constitutionally punish abstract advocacy of force or law violation.
example: I think the US government and the federal reserve should be dismantled and stripped of zionists asap by any means necessary. On May 31, 7:35 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > And I would like you to think about this before responding Plain Ol'.....I > know I give you, and MJ a lot of grief on here, (sometimes just to talk > smack!) but I am really curious as to your opinion here. Obviously, I > have a very strong personal opinion here, what with my > J.D./legal background, and although I am not a bar numbered attorney, I > sometimes think this influences me. > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:14 PM, plainolamerican > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > the Obama Justice Department warns against using social > > media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, > > threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights. " > > --- > > As of 2011, the Brandenburg test is still the standard used for > > evaluating attempts to punish inflammatory speech, and it has not been > > seriously challenged since it was laid down in 1969. Very few cases > > have actually reached the Court during the past decades that would > > test the outer limits of Brandenburg, so the test remains largely > > unqualified. > > > The U.S. Supreme Court reversed Brandenburg's conviction, holding that > > government cannot constitutionally punish abstract advocacy of force > > or law violation. The majority opinion was per curiam (issued from the > > Court as an institution rather than as authored and signed by an > > individual justice). The earlier draft had originally been prepared by > > Justice Abe Fortas before he was forced to resign in the midst of an > > ethics scandal, and would have included a modified version of the > > clear and present danger test. > > > On May 31, 1:24 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And I can do with a figure of Ol' Mo the Ham Head and call it either art > > or > > > shit. > > > > ** > > > BareNakedIslam posted: "In its latest effort to protect followers of > > > Islam in the U.S., the Obama Justice Department warns against using > > social > > > media to spread information considered inflammatory against Muslims, > > > threatening that it could constitute a violation of civil rights. " > > > New post on *BARE NAKED ISLAM* > > > <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1> Yes, but you can still dunk a > > > crucifix in a jar of urine and have it considered > > > “art”< > >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...> > > > by > > > BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1> > > > > In its latest effort to protect followers of Islam in the U.S., the Obama > > > Justice Department warns against using social media to spread information > > > considered inflammatory against Muslims, threatening that it could > > > constitute a violation of civil rights. By "spreading information > > > considered inflammatory against Muslims" - even if it's true - you could > > > violate the civil […] > > > > Read more of this > > > post< > >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...> > > > *BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>* | May 31, > > 2013 > > > at 2:12 pm | Categories: > > > EnemyWithin-American< > >http://www.barenakedislam.com/?taxonomy=category&term=enemywithin-ame...>| > > > URL:http://wp.me/p276zM-U9G > > > > Comment< > >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...> > > > See all comments< > >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a...> > > > > Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage > > > Subscriptions< > >https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf...>. > > > > *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: > >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/31/yes-but-you-can-still-dunk-a... > > > -- > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "PoliticalForum" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
