shooting those who persecute gays is an option.

On Jun 4, 12:20 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> *Mr. Palmer and a companion were attacked by a skinhead gang in California
> who stated their intent to kill them.  When Palmer pulled a gun out of his
> backpack the skinhead leader stepped back and said "Do you have a license
> for that?" before retreating.  You can read the other affidavits on line*
>
> SHELLY PARKER, et al.,) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DISTRICT ) OF COLUMRIA, et
> al., ) ) Defendants. ) )
>
> Case No. 03-CV-02 13-EGS
>
> DECLARATION OF TOM G. PALMER
>
> [image: page81image3788]
>
> DECLARATION OF TOM G. PALMER
>
> I, Tom G. Palmer, am competent to state, and if called upon would testify
> to the following basis on my personal knowledge:
>
>    1. I reside in the District of Columbia.
>    2. I own various firearms located outside
>
> the District of Columbia, including handguns and long guns, and presently
> intend to possess a functional handgun and long gun for self-defense within
> my own home, but I am prevented from doing so only by the defendants’
> active enforcement of unconstitutional policies complained of in this
> action. I am aware that I face criminal penalties if I possess a handgun,
> or any other functional firearm, at home.
>
> 3. In the summer of 1982, when I was living in California, I was assaulted
> because I am gay. I successfully warded off the assault with a handgun. I
> was walking with a co-worker to dinner when a group of young men started
> yelling at us, “faggot,” “homo,” “queer,” “we’re going to kill you,” and
> “they’ll never find your bodies.” and so on. After they had followed us for
> about 100 feet, we started running. Fortunately I was able to pull my
> handgun out of my backpack, and our assailants backed off. This experience
> has confirmed for me that I can defend myself with a handgun, and that I am
> far less effective in my ability to defend myself and act in concert for
> the common good without the use of a handgun.
>
> 4. Being deprived of a handgun limits my ability to defend myself and my
> ability to act in concert with others for the common good, as a handgun
> could often be better suited for such uses than a rifle or shotgun. Being
> deprived of a functional rifle or shotgun likewise limits my ability to
> defend myself and my ability to act in concert with others for the common
> good.
>
> I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
>
> Executed this the 13th day of March, 2003
>
> /s/ Tom G. Palmer__________ Tom G. Palmer
>
> [image: page81image6904]

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to