** **
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/facebook-forensics-what-feds-can-learn-your-digital-crumbs-6C10240840
**** Facebook forensics? What the feds can learn from your digital crumbs***
*

** **

Nidhi Subbaraman NBC News ****

6 hours ago ****

** **

Reuters file****

Bits of you are all over the Internet. If you've signed into Google and
searched, saved a file in your Dropbox folder, made a phone call using
Skype, or just woken up in the morning and checked your email, you're
leaving a trail of digital crumbs. People who have access to this
information — companies powering your emails and Web searches, advertisers
who are strategically directing ads at you — can build a picture of who you
are, what you like, and what you will probably do next. Revelations about
government counter-terrorism programs such as
PRISM<http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/06/18809021-sources-us-intelligence-agencies-tap-servers-of-top-internet-companies?lite>indicate
that federal agents and other operatives may use this data, too.
****

"Google knows what kinds of porn everyone in the world likes," Bruce
Schneier, a security and cryptography expert told NBC News. Not only are
companies tracking what you are doing, they are correlating it, he said.****

Since news of PRISM broke, the leaders of the tech companies have denied
knowledge of government access to their information. At Facebook, one of
the world's biggest data collectors, Mark Zuckerberg
<https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10100828955847631>posted a message
that read: "When governments ask Facebook for data, we review each request
carefully to make sure they always follow the correct processes and all
applicable laws, and then only provide the information if is required by
law."****

But the law already permits quite a bit of digital sniffing — much of it
without a warrant.****

While authorities need a warrant to access the content of emails stored by
companies like Yahoo and Google, they don't need a warrant for IP addresses
of the computers used to access accounts, ProPublica
notes<http://www.propublica.org/special/no-warrant-no-problem-how-the-government-can-still-get-your-digital-data>.
The government doesn't need a warrant to request draft emails, data stored
in the cloud on services like Dropbox and Google Drive, and emails and
texts that are older than 180 days old — investigators can demand them with
a subpoena.****

And when authorities do get a court order, the amount of available data
multiplies. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
clarified<http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/07/18824941-obama-nobody-is-listening-to-your-telephone-calls>in
a statement to press Thursday that the government has access not to
content of phone calls, but to "telephony metadata." That's a vague term,
but at the very
least<http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/06/verizon-nsa-metadata-surveillance-problem.html?mbid=gnep>,
in includes who you called, from where, and when.****

*Painting a picture of you*
Gather all of these shreds of metadata, apply some algorithms that spot
clues in patterns, and you can put together a pretty good idea of who a
person is, and what they're up to. ****

For example, when a group from MIT analyzed location
data<http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130325/srep01376/full/srep01376.html>from
cellphones of 1.5 million people in a single country over 15 months,
the team could identify individuals simply by knowing where they were on
four separate occasions.****

When Netflix released anonymous watch histories of 500,000 subscribers as
part of a public <http://www.netflixprize.com/>
contest<http://www.netflixprize.com/>to create an algorithm that
predicted what movie a person would like, Arvind
Narayanan <http://randomwalker.info/>, a security researcher at Princeton
University, and his colleague Vitaly Shmatikov,
pinned<http://www.cs.utexas.edu/%7Eshmat/shmat_oak08netflix.pdf>names
to numbers<http://www.cs.utexas.edu/%7Eshmat/shmat_oak08netflix.pdf>by
comparing histories in the anonymized data with comments made by named
individuals on IMDB. "In every case, you find two location points, or six
to eight movies, or three data points ... it's enough to identify a
person," Narayanan told NBC News. ****

Narayanan is now researching ways to make people harder to
identify<http://33bits.org/>by their online behavior.
****

Facebook, as you might imagine, provides a wealth of identifying
information. In a
study<http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/03/06/1218772110.abstract>published
in the Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences in March this year,
a team of data scientists
showed<http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/11/17260270-gay-conservative-high-iq-your-facebook-likes-can-reveal-traits?lite>that
they could work out a person's sexual preferences, political leanings,
and a host of other character details from their "likes." In a similar
manner, others can work out similar identifying characteristics from
"browsing histories, search queries, or purchase histories," they write in
their paper.****

"Commercial companies, governmental institutions, or even one’s Facebook
friends could use software to infer attributes such as intelligence, sexual
orientation, or political views that an individual may not have intended to
share," they add. "One can imagine situations in which such predictions,
even if incorrect, could pose a threat to an individual’s well-being,
freedom, or even life."****

*Snoop tricks*
Advertisers already track our lives with astonishing accuracy going off
very little information — Target has
known<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0>when
a woman was pregnant even before her family did. And just as
advertisers are profiling you to make money, law enforcement and
counter-terrorism operatives make use of these clues to hunt for suspects.**
**

In April, the NSA released a document called "Untangling the Web: A Guide
to Internet 
Research."<http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/05/nsa-manual-on-hacking-internet/>The
massive work, 643 pages total, contains loads and loads of tips for
hunting information that's publicly available on the Internet. One section,
about "Google Hacking" isn't really hacking at all, just fancy tricks for
locating accidentally published secrets. ****

Raytheon's Rapid Information Overlay Technology (or RIOT) software was
built to make some of this searching easier. Its government customers use
it to compile case files of location
data<http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/super-search-engine-tracks-terrorists-you-social-networks-1B8327842>scraped
from checkins on Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare and other public
social outlets.****

President Obama said in a statement on Friday that surveillance programs
like PRISM have "helped us prevent terrorist attacks." Still, privacy
advocates have consistently pointed to such initiatives as potentially
over-reaching.****

The key here is that, even without a so-called "back door" into Facebook,
Google, Apple and Microsoft servers (which the companies have vehemently
denied), and even without the warrants they need to get specific
information about individuals from those companies, the feds — and anyone
else — can see an awful lot. And they have you to thank for it. Remember
that next time you post to Facebook, upload a picture or comment on an
article ... like this one.****

*Nidhi Subbaraman writes about technology and science. Sheis being followed
on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/nidhisubs>,
Twitter<https://www.twitter.com/nidhisubs>and
Google+ <https://plus.google.com/114389969362275892621/posts>, join *****

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to