Geesh.....If this doesn't sum up Lil' TommyTomTomForNews,  I don't know
what does!

*See* *Also* Marshall Kirk & Hunter Madsen.


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> ** **
>
> Categories of abuse****
>
> ** **
>
> Trolls use a wide variety of strategies, some of which are unique to the
> Internet, including these:****
>
> ** **
>
>     Making outrageous comments designed to distract or frustrate. This is
> a Saul Alinsky-style tactic employed to stir emotion and angry reactions.*
> ***
>
>     Posing as a conservative and making comments that discredit the
> movement. After claiming to be a member of the movement, such as a tea
> party organization, the troll then proceeds to post long, incoherent
> diatribes to appear either racist or insane. In some cases, these “Trojan
> Horse Trolls” have been known to make posts that advocate or incite to the
> use of violence in an apparent attempt to provide evidence to leftist
> critics and government sources that the right is comprised of “radical
> extremists.”****
>
>     Dominating discussions. Trolls may attempt to throw a discussion off
> course and frustrate participants whose purpose is to engage in a serious
> and respectful exchange of views.****
>
>     Posting prewritten responses. Many trolls appear to have been supplied
> with a list or database of pre-planned “talking points” designed as
> generalized and deceptive responses to honest arguments. When trolls post
> prewritten responses, their words typically feel strangely plastic and
> rehearsed.****
>
>     Making false associations. In this technique, the position of honest
> posters is characterized in derogatory terms. For example, a troll may call
> advocates of Federal Reserve reform or abolition “conspiracy theorists” or
> “lunatics.” Or, by suggesting certain political arguments are “racist” or
> otherwise outside the accepted confines of serious political discourse,
> trolls attempt to dissuade readers from examining the evidence objectively.
> ****
>
>     Exhibiting false moderation. By pretending to be the “voice of reason”
> ****
>
> in an argument with obvious well-defined sides, trolls attempt to move
> readers to relegate the argument to a “gray area,” such that holding or
> seriously considering the argument is a leap away from reasoned judgment.*
> ***
>
>     Raising straw-man arguments. Here a troll will accuse his opposition
> of subscribing to a certain point of view, even if the argument is
> irrelevant and never actually raised.****
>
> ** **
>
> Professional trolls****
>
> ** **
>
> WND moderators have developed criteria for helping to identify a
> professional troll:****
>
> ** **
>
>     The person’s posts are usually short and snarky, with reasonably
> correct spelling, grammar and punctuation, suggesting both intelligence and
> education.****
>
>     The posts are on the edge of acceptability, with little or no
> profanity or vulgar language that would get the post flagged immediately.*
> ***
>
>     The person has a high ratio of posts to the number of days on the
> site, suggesting he’s posting comments nearly full time and is getting paid
> to troll.****
>
>     The person posts politely on progressive websites but nastily on
> conservative websites, using the same username and IP address.****
>
>     The person’s posts are consistently belittling, rather than
> intelligent objections and points.****
>
>     The person’s posts address a broad spectrum of topics rather than
> focusing on one or two subjects of particular interest. The consistency is
> in the support of leftist policies and positions taken by the Obama
> administration.****
>
> ** **
>
> Once the person is blacklisted, the WND moderators do not receive a
> complaint. Instead, the person quietly returns to post on WND forums in a
> different incarnation, perhaps using a different username, IP address or
> email.****
>
> ** **
>
> WND moderators have concluded the purpose of a troll is not to
> intelligently discuss various issues but to minimize the importance of
> dissenting opinions by ridiculing serious participants expressing political
> views the troll finds objectionable.****
>
> ** **
>
> Sometimes trolls appear to needle serious participants with the goal of
> inciting irrational retorts that can embarrass them, perhaps even to the
> point of being reported to employers or to the government.****
>
> ** **
>
> WND moderators frequently experience waves of troll attacks that they
> suspect occur in response to a “call to arms” from a progressive website or
> blog.****
>
> ** **
>
> Pajama bandits****
>
> ** **
>
> A person identified as “AMA” posted a comment on the website Above Top
> Secret that apparently offers insight into how professional trolls operate.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
>     I was a paid Internet troll****
>
> ** **
>
>     For almost five years, I was a paid Internet troll. Yes, I admit.****
>
> ** **
>
>     But first let me state that I never performed my job here on ATS,
> though I believe I have occasionally seen a handful on here who were using
> a script similar to what I was assigned.****
>
> ** **
>
>     I cannot and will not name names, but after an internship at a firm
> with government and political party (Republican) contracts, I was offered
> the position of “Online Communications Associate” at another company by
> someone from the original firm for which I interned. My contract completed
> one year ago, and I have since moved on.****
>
> ** **
>
>     Utilizing six artificial personas, I was active in social networks and
> bulletin boards. But since I came to love and respect this site, as I
> stated, I never performed my functions here. Each week, I and presumably
> several others, were provided with information to use in our online
> postings. At first the information was comprised of fully conceived
> scripts, but as I became more and more experienced, it eventually became
> simple bullet or talking points.****
>
> ** **
>
>     At first I needed to provide links to my postings, but when the
> company name changed (never knew the real names of any people there), that
> requirement stopped.****
>
> ** **
>
>     The pay wasn’t very good, but since I was working from my apartment, I
> suppose it wasn’t bad, and I was able to do several other writing
> assignments on the side.****
>
> ** **
>
>     AMA****
>
> ** **
>
> WND will maintain an open posting policy on its forums, but will continue
> identifying and removing trolls who abuse the privilege.****
>
> ** **
>
> WND staff member Janet Falkenstein contributed to this article.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Read more at****
>
> http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/leftist-trolls-in-ongoing-war-with-wnd/#...****
>
>
> __._,_.___
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>  --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to