“Just say ‘No’.”****

** **

B****

*Police set up roadblocks to 'voluntarily' collect DNA, blood samples from
innocent Americans *****

**[image: http://www.naturalnews.com/images/authors/MikeAdams.jpg]**Wednesday,
June 12, 2013
by Mike Adams <https://plus.google.com/u/0/108002809946749848449?rel=author>,
the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all
articles...)<http://www.naturalnews.com/index-HRarticles.html>
*Tags: DNA swabs <http://www.naturalnews.com/DNA_swabs.html>,
roadblocks<http://www.naturalnews.com/roadblocks.html>,
police state <http://www.naturalnews.com/police_state.html>*****


(NaturalNews) When a group of uniformed men wearing guns sets up a road
block then ask you to "volunteer" a DNA sample and blood sample, it
stretches the definition of "volunteer." But that's what happened in
Alabama yesterday as off-duty cops in two counties set up DNA collection
roadblocks and stopped cars to ask if drivers wanted to "volunteer" DNA
swabs and blood samples.

It was all part of a study being conducted by the *Pacific Institute for
Research and Evaluation <http://www.pire.org/topiclist2.asp?cms=67>*, which
is probably studying what percentage of the sheeple population will allow
the government to swipe their DNA and archive it in a database for a measly
ten bucks.

According to a story published in the Daily
Caller<http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/10/off-duty-cops-collect-dna-samples-at-alabama-roadblocks/>,
"drivers were asked to voluntarily offer samples of their saliva and blood."

Just one county in Alabama had set up *five roadblocks in one day*, and
more are being rolled out nationwide. The explanation behind all this is
that it's for a "medical study" to see how much alcohol drivers have in
their blood.****

*If this is a "medical" study, then why not have scientists in lab coats
stopping cars to collect blood?*****

So here's the real problem with all this: when police carrying guns walk up
to your car at a roadblock and ask if you will "volunteer" some samples of
your blood and DNA, that's more than a bit coercive. If this is truly
supposed to be a scientific study of the
blood<http://www.naturalnews.com/blood.html>alcohol levels of
anonymous drivers, then why not have scientists in lab
coats on the streets collecting the blood?

Answer: Because no one would give it to them. The police are there to make
sure the "volunteer requests" are backed up by the implied threat of force.
A roadblock staffed by men with guns is going to get a lot more
"compliance" than a roadside volunteer booth staffed by a bunch of lab
geeks.

And that's why this little police
state<http://www.naturalnews.com/police_state.html>experiment is a
*gross abuse of police power* and a violation of the civil rights of those
targeted in the study. Besides, since when did scientists have to use
police to collect data for their studies, anyway?****

*Faulty data being gathered*****

If the real purpose of the roadblocks is to collect blood samples for a
study documenting alcohol levels of random drivers -- as it claimed by the
study organizers -- then they need to go back to school and learn about
scientific methods. Because all you're going to get in this study is a
self-selected sample of blood and DNA <http://www.naturalnews.com/DNA.html>from
*the most timid, easy-to-dominate sheeple of society*... or people who live
on such low incomes that $10 seems to be fair compensation for allowing the
government to swipe their DNA and archive it in a database.

In other words, you're going to end up studying the blood and DNA of *society's
total morons and dumbed-down sheeple*, many of whom are physiological
anomalies to begin with because they all have no spine, no guts and no
balls, either.

Thus, the entire stated purpose of the study is hogwash. There is no
scientific validity to any data set of human DNA generated from
roadblocks<http://www.naturalnews.com/roadblocks.html>staffed by
police. The study is invalid at the outset because, by design,
it fails to test the blood of those who prefer NOT to interact with police
-- i.e. people who have probably been drinking.

This is why I don't believe for a minute that this is some sort of public
safety study. It's far more likely to be a
*police<http://www.naturalnews.com/police.html>state test run
* just to see how many idiots in American society will let some government
goon swab their DNA when commanded to do so. And that number is shockingly
high. We now live in the United States of Apathy, where the sheeple are far
more interested in their late-night television, Happy Meals and on-screen
celebrities than protecting their rights from an ever-expanding
surveillance police state.

Don't you find it amazing, though, to realize all the police state
contradictions now in place? Consider:

• At a police DNA swab checkpoint, you're supposed to open your mouth. But
at a TSA checkpoint if you open your mouth, you're detained as a possible
terrorist.

• At the TSA checkpoint, though, you're supposed to remove your belt and
drop your pants. But at a police DNA checkpoint, if you drop your pants,
you're arrested for indecent exposure.

• In America, a "terrorist" is a citizen who forgets at which checkpoint
he's supposed to drop his pants vs. open his mouth. And if all this talk
about pants dropping and mouths opening gets you excited, Janet Napolitano
has a job waiting for you at DHS.

Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/040726_DNA_swabs_roadblocks_police_state.html#ixzz2W04X3b7j
****

 ****

****


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to