****

** **

Sharia act r8.2: *"Lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory*"****

 ****

 ===========================================================****

 ****

 ****

How Muslims defend Islam: Slandering Other Religions For Advancing Islam****

http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/163-abid-ali/1357-how-muslims-defend-islam-slandering-other-religions-for-advancing-islam.html
****

 ****

Monday, 08 July 2013 02:32 Abid Ali****

        ****

Islam is a cult which stands and prospers only by slandering other faiths.
Since tender age, Muslims inculcate in their children the ideas that
Christians are infidels and has corrupted the Bible; Jews are pigs and apes
and corrupted their holy book even more; Hindus are idol worshippers, a
totally false religion, thus they are Kafirs and Mushriks; Buddhists are
also idol worshippers, and so on. They keep on finding faults with each and
every other religious faith. They label them with various terms and
expressions to belittle those religions. At the same time, they exaggerate,
embellish and embroider their own cult deceitfully. While most of them do
it unwittingly, some do so intentionally in the hope of winning the heart
and favors of Allah. They fail to understand such a simple thing that an
Omnipotent God would never need any kind of lies or superficial
beautification to promote and glorify His religion. Muslims hold an
attitude concerning other religions, which is best summed by the famous
proverb: "Give a dog a bad name and hang him".****

** **

Islam strictly forbids symbolisms. Muslims never sketch the image of Allah
or of Muhammad. They are not even supposed to draw any living animals in
picture. Idol worship is symbolism, not equivalent to making partners with
God. Hindus do not say that there are two Gods; Christians or Jews never
claim that God is multiple. Yet Muslims insult those religions with the
false accusation of having multiple Gods. This is a malicious ploy that
Islam use to slander and sully the image of every other religion, so that
Islam can be advanced.****

** **

We humans are completely dependent on symbolism; we can never do without
it. Whatever name we utter is a verbal representation of that object which
we call with that name. For example, when we say “tree” we are just using
the word ‘TREE’ instead of showing a tree in real. It is, thus, a symbolic
representation of a real tree. But Islam outlaws only the pictorial
symbolism not the vocal, because Muhammad lacked the sense of
differentiating between these two types of imageries people use. Even any
concrete object is not possible to denote without the use of verbal
representation, then how is it even possible to think of realizing an
abstract thing like “love”, “intelligence” or “wisdom” without the use of
symbolic representation? It is impossible for us to live without using
symbolism in perceiving even earthly matter. Then imagine how it is
possible to conceive or perceive the idea of a God who is abstract and
transcendental.****

** **

While God is said to be beyond the reach of human mind, Hindus never really
make partners with the Creator of the universe. They are worshippers of
Nature and its every manifestation. They make idols of gods and goddesses
of and revere various forces and elements of Nature like trees, snakes,
cows, the sun, rivers, parents, education, wealth, beauty, honesty and so
on. Their worship is a sort of tribute they pay to the powerful and
beneficent aspects of Nature and its facets, which again does not mean that
they believe in multiple creators of the universe. Hindus worship
Saraswati, but do not believe that Saraswati is the Creator of the
universe. They revere and pay devotion to Saraswati only as the
manifestation of knowledge and education which is again a faculty of the
conscious universe. Can I question Muslims that isn’t prostrating towards
Kaaba is a symbolism, isn’t throwing stones at Satan is emblematic
representation or isn’t kissing the Black Stone a ‘Shirk’? If Satan is
detained at *Mecca*, then who has been misguiding human through the ages?
If Muslims kiss the Black Stone just because Umar saw Muhammad once kissing
it, couldn’t the second rightly guided Khalifa question and guide his
unguided Apostle to stop him from doing ‘Shirk’?****

** **

Muslims claim that the Bible and the Torah (Jewish scriptures) are
corrupted, but when asked to provide some historical or logical evidence to
prove when, how and who corrupted it, they would disappear. The fact is
that the Quran was codified into a book 2 decades after Muhammad’s death
under caliph Uthman, when many contradictory copies of the Quran were
disregarded and burned to ashes. The Gospels of Jesus were also written
down 2-3 decades after the death of Jesus. Then, how can Muslims
claim--without producing any evidence--that the Christian Bible is
corrupted, but the Quran is not?****

** **

Muslims never even hesitate to assert (without evidence) that Buddhists are
idol-worshippers. Buddhism, in fact, is a non-God religion? Still, Muslims
obdurately claim that they are idol-worshippers. They just need to pick
holes into every other faith and ideology in order to elevate Islam. How
awful!****

** **

When I was a Muslim, I found no errors in the Quran. But when I started
reading the scriptures and materials of other religions and tried to
compare those with the Quran, I started finding moral and ethical problems
and scientific errors in the Quran. Obviously I never read the Quran with
critical intentions when I was a devout Muslim. When I started reading it
with an open mind and tried to find wisdom and noble teachings, all I found
were those Islam-specified virtues like Salah, Fasting and Zakat and
Hajj--hardly anything of value for the welfare of mankind. Since my
childhood, I received advice from Muslims not to study non-Islamic
religious books or materials, because they were supposed to be filled with
sinful teachings. No religion despises other religions as does Islam. When
I eventually read books of Hindu pundits, I found no concept like the
damnation of the followers of other religions into hellfire, or God’s wrath
upon those, who do not become Hindu or can’t be enlightened to embrace
Hinduism. Unlike in Islam, I also found that other religions don’t demand
that one must change one’s name, attire, physical appearances or faith for
Salvation, Moksh, and Enlightenment or for Heaven.****

** **

Now I understand why Muslims demands that their children do not read, hear,
or gaze upon anything that is critical or derogatory to Islamic ideologies.
If someone realizes how vile Islam is, Muslims start belittling him with
disparaging terms and names, like disbeliever, cursed, hellish, blind,
prone, kafir, murtad (apostate), munafiq (hypocrite), filthy, misguided,
ill-advised, ill-bred, unilluminated etc., which Muhammad himself used and
recommended for those who criticize or leave Islam. Though few jargons like
Murtad and Munafiq are not so offensive literally for non-Muslims or
ex-ones, but they are used by Muslims in a very contemptuous way.****

** **

There are many faculties and attributes of the human mind, like perceiving,
observing, realizing, looking, believing, knowing, empathizing, memorizing,
recognizing, comprehending, feeling, being aware, being conscious and
unconscious etc. Among these faculties of the mind, one can be used to
deceive or manipulate others, which is ‘believing’. I can’t deceive you if
you observe me; I can’t deceive you if you perceive me; I can’t deceive you
if you realize me; I can’t deceive you if you understand me; I can’t
deceive you if you know me. But I can deceive you if you BELIEVE me and
very easily if you believe me blindly. In the Quran, immense emphasis has
been put on ‘believing’ unconditionally with the promise of Allah’s
infinite blessings and happiness as a reward. Concurrently, lot of curses
and insolence have been showered along with ominous intimidation upon
those, who doubt instead of blindly believing the Quran. In Surah 2
(Baqra-Cows), the word ‘Believe’ has been used 48 times, with total number
of verses on ‘Believe’, ‘Believing’ and ‘Believers’ are 34 and the total
number of verses on the evil of ‘Doubt’ is 5. Now just imagine how
desperate is the Creator of the universe to make us believe in Him, in
Muhammad and in the life after death. Out of so many faculties, only
‘Believing’ is very dear to Allah and reward for that simple task is great
and infinite. Allah has nothing to do with more prized faculties, such as
realizing, perceiving, comprehending, empathizing, feeling, being aware or
being conscious. Allah needs only ‘Believing’ blindly.****

** **

Albert Einstein said the important thing is not to stop questioning;
Galileo called doubt the father of inventions; Oliver Holmes Jr said to
have doubted one’s own first principle as the mark of civilized man; Wilson
Mizner maintained that he respected faith but doubt is what gets you an
education.****

** **

The Muslim sense of wisdom is limited to the ‘Uniqueness of Allah’.
Whenever one desires to talk to Muslims, they reply: ‘The greatest wisdom
is the exclusivity of Allah’. No matter what philosophy you wish to
discuss, their answer is shrunken to oneness of Allah. Whether you talk
about Epistemology, Metaphysics, Aesthetics, Existentialism or
Transcendental philosophy or something other, their answer is consistent,
‘Allah is One’. Such responses are too sickening for those, who are not
diseased by Quranic verses. They reply in such an exaggerated and
over-emphasized way that the whole world is conspiring against Allah to
create and worship many other gods, when in truth no well-established
religion says that there are multiple Gods. Muhammad was not the first to
profess monotheism. He just exploited the well-established concept of
monotheism in an over-exaggerated manner for declaring himself a prophet of
Allah in Mecca, then the metropolis of idol-worship in Arabia. And his
intention was to rule, subjugate and dominate other peoples, groups and
lands. Every ruler, dictator or monarch needs some basis to manipulate and
maneuver the masses, just like Hitler chose nationalism and restoring the
German pride as such a basis, Stalin chose proletariat and class struggle,
while Jim Jones chose social justice. In the Quran (4:48), Allah says:****

** **

*“Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He
forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with Allah
is to devise a sin Most heinous indeed.”*****

** **

Which means Allah can forgive murder, genocide, rape, robbery, pedophilia
or any grave crime, but cannot forgive the making partners of Allah. Why
Allah is so jealous of other Gods and goddesses, which, Allah knows full
well, does not exists?****

** **

Once an educated Muslim told me that God is not ONE but Allah is. He meant
to say God is not the universal God but Allah is. I told him that yes,
Allah is ONE, and He is the SINGLE supreme evil supernatural Being, who was
worshipped by Pagans and ancestors of Muhammad and even Pagan Muhammad
himself. Allah is ONE but cannot be the creator of the Universe.****

** **

Islamic scholars and writers are so corrupt minded that they don’t feel any
shame for stealing the wisdom and insightful ideas from the books and
resources of freethinking educationists, agnostics, atheist intellectuals
and philosophers, and ascribe them to their Islamic literature. Once I read
a book of vigorous and prolific Maulana of the Indian subcontinent, who
wrote profound ideas about education and importance of education along with
the problems and solutions of educating a child in a true sense. The author
basically spilled over the major part of book the thoughts and ideas of
great educationists like John Dewey, Bertrand Russell, A. N. Whitehead and
others, and then tried to show that all these great ideas were oozing out
of the Quran and Hadiths by stating a few dubious Quranic verses, like
Surah 96:1:****

** **

*”Proclaim! [Iqraa or read!] in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who
created…”*****

** **

The shameless Maulana wrote that the very first command of Allah was to
educate and get educated, and the Quran emphasizes on the importance of
education and learning. The word ‘Iqraa’ in this verse, which means ‘to
read’, was intended for Muhammad to recite the Quranic verses that Gabriel
brought to him at the time of the very first revelation. It was never
intended for promoting education in a general sense. Indeed, it was
actually not even meant for “reading”, but for reciting to memorize
something, just like the little children learn ghost stories from grandmas.*
***

** **

Another similarly mendacious Islamic scholar wrote a book about the
philosophy of transcendental God. This author spent all his ink in writing
the philosophies of Aristotle, Plato and other great thinkers, culled from
and combined together, and then attributed it to Allah and Muhammad with a
few simple verses from the Quran, like from Surah Ikhlas (112:1/4):****

** **

*“Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He
begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him”.*****

** **

Even a child can say this sort of simple attributes of the Almighty, but
here the malicious Ullemas do their part to deceive the simple-minded and
gullible readers consciously and some with unconscious folly. Besides this,
their deriving profound and intricate theories from such mundane verses
through forcible mental acrobatics is nothing less than miraculous to say
the least.****

** **

A theory, scripture or belief cannot be true just because they suit our
preconceived opinions, emotions, or temperament. It has to be universally
true and acceptable. Muslims take the Quran to be divine, because it says
what he consciously or subconsciously believes from the depth of his heart.
Many a times we conclude wrongly after going over something difficult to
comprehend, but when we read again after some period of time, we infer
differently to correct the meaning, which we had made out wrongly. But
still, the Quran is written vaguely and incoherently, that is the reason
why there are hundreds of commentaries, interpretations, and explanations.
The Quran does not imply what a Muslim reader understands but the reader
infers what he wants to imbibe as per his understanding and temperament at
the moment. If the Quran would be clear, it would not offer differing
meanings to different readers or if one reads it after a period of time. It
would be constant in its meaning and implications. Muslims even take this
inconsistency of sense and connotation to be a miracle. But there is no
such miracle in Science. A scientific theory has no contradiction and
controversy about any scientific laws, neither one interprets or infers
differently. Whatever the meaning of a scientific theory is understood by
an Indian student, the same would be understood by any one anywhere in the
world.****

** **

Islamic scholars hide the Quran’s ambiguity by calling it eloquent. It
seems that they don’t even know the meaning of eloquence. Eloquence is the
fine use of vocabulary where exact meaning is conveyed what one wants to
say, instead of multiple meanings could be inferred out of it. Then the
question arises: Why Allah would like to give his message in such an
ambiguous language, which majority would not be able to understand, or they
interpret it in different ways when the purpose is to convey the message to
all?****

** **

Muslims boast and flaunt their confidence and certitude enormously about
their faith and ideology, but when critics vanquished them thoroughly
leaving them speechless, they run off by quoting a Quranic verse from Surah
109:6:****

 “*To you be your Way, and to me mine.*” This is probably the very last
stupid stunt played by them****


__._,_._






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to