July 18, 2013 ****
Hawks, Doves -- and Ostriches****

*By* *Michael Widlanski* <http://www.americanthinker.com/michael_widlanski/>
****

Power politics is not about the good, the bad and the ugly. It is about
hawks, doves, and ostriches. Hawks and doves can be good or bad, depending
on the circumstances. Ostriches are always ugly. ****

Hawks are assertive and even aggressive, while doves are responsive and
even submissive, but the ostriches always stick their heads in the sand.
Ostriches ignore real conditions on the ground, and they dig in. They wave
their tails in the air, hoping they will not get bitten in the rear. ****

In the Mideast, where the sand is hot, getting one's head stuck in the sand
is not an optimal strategic position, but sometimes it's a great pose. ****

High-level poseurs, like European Union (EU) representatives, like group
pictures with world leaders. Their book of achievements is never more than
a picture portfolio. "We call on all sides to show restraint," is the
caption on the photo of the ostrich at the White House , the EU or the
State Department preaching to the rapists and those they raped, telling
Iranian protesters not to offend the ayatollahs, urging Egyptians not to
insult Muslim Brothers, and bloodied Syrians not to be mean to Uncle
Bashar. ****

If you want to see humans imitating an ostrich look at Barack Obama,
Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, or EU officials repeatedly ignoring realities
in Syria, Libya, Iran, and Egypt and concentrating their attention on that
great Middle Eastern mirage known as the "Israeli-Palestinian peace
process." ****

This week, the EU declared guidelines for its 28 member states banning any
funding, cooperation, or awards to Jews in the West Bank and "East
Jerusalem." The EU feels that this helps peace or at least shows it loves
peace as much as John Kerry, who has been jetting around the Mideast to
advance the "Israeli-Palestinian peace process." ****

Apart from the fact that the EU (which is a witness to some Israel-PLO
agreements) is essentially prejudicing, intervening in, and violating the
process it is supposed to support, there are three little problems with the
"Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process." ****

�-� Palestinian: The Palestinians are not really a national group in any
sense, but only sets of clans and tribes without a real self-image,
historical heritage, or any real desire for self rule. "Palestinians" are
now divided between Hamas, the PLO and others. Hamas swears to kill all
Israelis, while the PLO does its swearing in private. ****

�-� Process: Palestinian leaders are working on the "process" of
dismantling Israel. Their "negotiating" begins and ends by imposing
schedules for Israeli pull-outs and freeing convicted terrorists. The
PLO-Hamas idea of nationhood is a zero-sum game that begins and ends with
dismembering Israel. ****

On brief occasions <http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=24713>when PLO and
Hamas assert "unity" for a few days, as in March 2005, they agree only
about the old doctrine of taking Israel apart by stages. In Arabic, this is
called *barnamaj al-marahil* -- the strategy of stages, announced in 1974.
It has been frequently reasserted by the PLO and Hamas, but never
renounced. ****

�-� Peace: When PLO leaders talk "peace with Israel", they do not mean a
peace of tranquility but only a transitional "stage" that will become a
graveyard peace. ****

PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas (also known as Abu Mazen) does not mean "*wa-'aleikum
al-salaam*" -- "peace be upon you" the traditional blessing to an equal
colleague. He does not feel Israel has the right to be treated like an
equal partner or as a predominately Jewish state. Like Arafat, Abbas has
broken every agreement with Israel. He has urged boycotts and sanctions of
Israel and turned a blind eye to terrorists in his territory. He continues
to honor those who attack Israel. Abbas wants to get the international
community, to force a diktat down Israel's throat, to make Israel weak.
When Abbas opposed attacking Israel, he only did so because he thought it
would be "counterproductive" since Israel was too strong militarily. When
Abbas speaks of peace in English, he means what Arafat meant: the Arabic
phrase for the dead: *wa'alaihi al-salaam* -- "may he rest in peace." ****

Western doves --Israelis, Americans, Europeans -- who devoted much of their
careers to supporting Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas have had mixed
results. ****

They achieved "accords" with the PLO and a pullback from Gaza. Over time,
however, the hawkish position seems to have won the strategic argument,
particularly as viewed through the prism of the "Arab Spring" that has
become the Fall of the Arab state system. ****

Though some doves were honored in diplomatic councils and in the media,
often, their political careers died with the false promise of a phony
peace. Shimon Peres still pushes the PLO as a peace partner. He is feted by
the likes of Bill Clinton and Barbra Streisand. But after signing with the
PLO, Peres never won another election, because Israelis think the accords
with the PLO were a mistake. ****

Hawks, however, proved they were right about much of the strategic
analysis: making concessions to Arab regimes and organizations is a very
risky gamble that can vanish with sudden political change, especially when
the deal is built on sand -- trusting the word of hardened tyrants and
terrorists like Yasser Arafat and the Assad Family:****

�-�The Peres vision of PLO-Israeli peace actually ushered in the worst
decade of terror in Israel's history, with more than a thousand murdered;***
*

�-� Ariel Sharon's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and his immoral and
illegal eviction of 10,000 law-abiding Israelis led to terror, rocket
warfare on Israel's cities, and internal dislocation for hundreds of
Israeli families. This is something Israelis now think was a huge error,
even a sin. ****

�-� Many doves who pushed for "sacrifices for peace" such as withdrawal
from Gaza also pushed hard to force Israel to withdraw its army and its
citizens from the Golan Heights. Just imagine what Israel's strategic
position would be if it had listened to the doves and had ceded the Golan
Heights to the bloodthirsty Assad regime. ****

As the EU again scolds Israel or Obama-Kerry ask for Israeli concessions,
we should heed Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir's warning against "salami
tactics" by Arab states and Western powers pressing Israel to slice off
pieces of herself, her hard-won land and security for promises that often
turn out to be pure baloney.****

*Dr. Michael Widlanski, is the author of **Battle for Our Minds: Western
Elites and the Terror Threat
*<http://www.amazon.com/Battle-Our-Minds-Western-Elites/dp/1451659032/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334089503&sr=8-1>
*published by Threshold/Simon and Schuster. He was Strategic Affairs
Advisor in Israel's Ministry of Public Security, and he will be a visiting
professor at University of California, Irvine. *****


*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2013/07/hawks_doves_and_ostriches.html
* at July 18, 2013 - 08:58:15 AM CDT****


__._,_.__






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to