http://www.rightsidenews.com/2013072232926/life-and-science/health-and-education/states-begin-selling-information-from-their-all-payer-databases.html
****

** **
States Begin Selling Information from their All-Payer
Databases<http://www.rightsidenews.com/2013072232926/life-and-science/health-and-education/states-begin-selling-information-from-their-all-payer-databases.html>
****

Published on Monday, 22 July 2013 14:51 ****

Written by Linda Gorman ****

Even before the Colorado legislature passed the All-Payer Database law and
the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing turned your [image:
Medical Records for Sale]medical records over to CIVHC, a private
501(c)(3), the Independence Institute warned that allowing states to
routinely requisition medical records would compromise medical privacy (see
this<http://liberty.i2i.org/2010/03/01/house-bill-1330-the-all-payer-database-is-a-transparency-trojan-horse/>,
this<http://healthcare.i2i.org/2011/12/22/colorado-all-payer-database-poses-serious-risk-little-gain/>,
and 
this<http://healthcare.i2i.org/2010/02/25/Bill-Summary-HB10-1330-the-All-Payer-DatabaseA-Transparency-Trojan-Horse/>).
The problem is that medical records contain so much personal data that
individuals can be identified even if names and SSNs are redacted.****

Bloomberg is now
reporting<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-05/states-hospital-data-for-sale-puts-privacy-in-jeopardy.html>that
states hungry for revenue and flush with the power to requisition
individual medical records are moving to capitalize on the value of that
information by selling the information in those records to all comers.
Unlike private companies, states and their agents are exempt from HIPAA
requirements and therefore do not have to take data privacy especially
seriously.****

In an experiment, researchers were able to match several dozen people with
their supposedly de-identified medical records by combining public record
searches and the information in a sample group of records purchased for $50
from Washington State. Among other things, “an executive treated for
assault was found to have a painkiller addiction,” and a “retiree who
crashed his motorcycle was described as arthritic and morbidly obese.”****

CIVHC’s “De-Identified” data
set<http://civhc.org/getmedia/5810c9d1-dc77-45d5-bba0-f2d5e79638d5/CO-APCD-Request-for-CR-or-DID-Set-DRA-and-DUA-1-10-13.doc.aspx>for
Colorado includes type of insurance, gender, month and year of birth,
city of residence, race/ethnicity, month and year of admission, where
service was provided, the zip code where service was provided, the DEA code
or National Provider Identifier number code for the person providing
service, details of the drugs prescribed and how they were delivered, and
all payment details for everything. The de-identified data set also
includes details of family relationships, such as whether the person
receiving services is the spouse or child of the person who owns the family
insurance policy.****

The attack on medical privacy also represents another front in the
legislature’s war on rural Colorado. In rural areas with small populations,
there is more than enough data in the “de-identified data set” to link
individuals to their medical records.****

Consider Montrose hospital. In 2012, it
hosted<http://www.montrosehospital.com/pdf/annual%20community%20report.pdf>2,563
surgeries and 469 births. In 2011, the hospital received 77 percent
of its patients from an area with a population of about 42,000. It
contained about 7,000 females of childbearing age, 4,347 people between 25
and 34, and 127 black people. Its service area includes the town of
Naturita, population 635. Census records show that there are 32 Hispanic
residents fewer than 10 of whom were between the ages of 15 and 40 in 2010.
If the de-identified data set includes a birth by a Hispanic mother from
Naturita, it would not be difficult to match her to her medical records.****

With the passage of the All-Payer Database, members of the Colorado
legislature made it quite clear that protecting your medical privacy was
not a priority. Until the law is repealed, along with similar requirements
in ObamaCare, your medical records are for sale to the highest bidder.****

Every future visit to a doctor or a hospital should be made with this in
mind. If you need health care and you have, or have ever had, a health
condition that you do not want to make public knowledge, you might be wise
to travel to a state or foreign country that takes medical privacy more
seriously.****

*---Linda Gorman* is a Senior Fellow and Director of the Health Care Policy
Institute at the Independence
Institute<http://www.rightsidenews.com/Health%20Care%20Policy%20Center>,
a state-based free market think tank in Golden, Colorado.

A former academic economist, she has written extensively about the problems
created by government interference in health care decisions and the promise
of consumer directed health care. Her articles on minimum wages, education,
and discrimination appear in the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics.****

Established in 2002, the Health Care Policy
Center<http://healthcare.i2i.org/>'s
focus on public policy that safeguards consumers'' ability to determine
their own choices about their own health care and the care of their
families. HCPC fights the expansion of government directed health care that
infringes upon individual choice. Director Linda Gorman has earned a
reputation as one of the nation's leading experts in free market health
care issues****

** **


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to