Resisting the public education system in America is not just a good idea; 
it is a duty.
---
and leave the masses uneducated?

Acts 5:29 ... Exodus 20
---
religious myth to ignore.

On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:35:29 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote:
>
>  
> *The Messianic Character of American Education 50 Years Later
> *By Allen Mendenhall
> July 24, 2013
>
> R.J. Rushdoony published *The Messianic Character of American Education 
> *<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1879998068/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=lewrockwell&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=1879998068&adid=01YZDMTGET6PFFRV8WE5&&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F%3Fpost_type%3Darticle%26p%3D444095%26preview%3Dtrue>in
>  
> 1963 as American troop levels were surging in Vietnam, Americans were 
> digging bomb shelters in their backyards, hippies were experimenting with 
> recreational drugs and free love and generating an antiauthoritarian 
> counterculture, the Civil Rights Movement was gaining momentum even against 
> state-sponsored opposition, President Kennedy was assassinated, music and 
> fashion were changing, a second wave of feminism was spreading after the 
> publication of Betty Friedan’s *The Feminine Mystique*, Great Society 
> programs were being proposed, and governments everywhere were experimenting 
> with new forms of espionage and intelligence-gathering. Statism was on the 
> rise. It isn’t surprising that the American educational system, both in 
> terms of standards and curriculum, was destabilized during this time.
>
> “Education in this era,” Rushdoony claimed, “is a messianic and utopian 
> movement” for which the state had “become the saving institution” and the 
> schools proclaimers of “a new gospel of salvation.” Against the 
> “superimposition of the state on every order of life and every sphere of 
> human activity,” Rushdoony sought to restore education to its classical, 
> religious foundations. His book tracts the growth of statist education from 
> the nineteenth century through the mid-twentieth century and profiles 
> several educators (too many to list) who represent pedagogical paradigm 
> shifts.
>
> A Presbyterian theologian, philosopher, author, and grassroots organizer, 
> Rushdoony was influenced by apologist Cornelius Van Til and opposed 
> Statism, which he considered idolatry if not a religion. He was at the 
> forefront of the Christian homeschool movement and challenged the 
> fashionable practices and ideals that elected officials and public school 
> administrators were championing in government schools at the expense of 
> biblical education.
>
> “Education today,” Rushdoony said, “occupies an equivocal position in 
> contemporary life, functioning both as a scapegoat for every failure and as 
> a catch-all for every hope and expectation of society.” It is striking the 
> extent to which these words still describe the current morass in public 
> education.
>
> The U.S. Congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001 with 
> bipartisan support and thereby expanded the role of the federal government 
> in local education to unprecedented levels. This Act imposed strict but 
> arbitrary guidelines on teachers, shifted decisions from local school 
> boards to the federal government, mandated school accountability to the 
> federal government, and standardized student testing. Such centralization 
> of power exceeded anything that Plato could have imagined for his fictional 
> Republic.
>
> And the federal government was not done. Government subsidized failure in 
> the economy resulted in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009, 
> which redistributed $100 billion (the figure differs from analyst to 
> analyst) from taxpayers to the public education system to prevent teacher 
> layoffs; increase teacher salaries; fund Pell-Grants, special education, 
> and the Head Start Program; and encourage the construction and repair of 
> school facilities. This Act was not benevolent or charitable; it gave away 
> money taken by force and demanded, in return, the allegiance and obedience 
> of local schools and school boards. Nor was the Act, as the White House 
> maintains, part of a “nationwide effort to create jobs and transform our 
> economy to compete in the 21st century.” Instead it was a mechanism to 
> ensure the continued worship and viability of state education; for the 
> system works only if its members remain happy and the illusion of integrity 
> and protection can be maintained.
>
> As if that were not enough, President Obama, in his State of the Union 
> Address this year, proposed “early learning” that would compel parents to 
> turn their children over to the government at a younger age. Rather than 
> attending private preschools, churches, synagogues, or daycares of their 
> parents’ choosing, four year olds apparently will become indoctrinated into 
> Statism and all its accessory ideologies (radical egalitarianism, 
> nationalism, central planning) in the public schools before they can even 
> read or write. The pretext for “early learning” is that education must be 
> universal so that American children can excel and compete in a global 
> workforce; but a more sinister and unstated purpose is, in Rushdoony’s 
> words, “the exaltation of the group, whether humanity, democracy, the 
> proletariat or the folk,” which “has steadily become religious, and the 
> state school a religious institution.”
>
> Rushdoony submits that the following assumptions undergird Statism:
>
> 1. That “the child is the child of the state or the property of the state, 
> which can therefore interfere extensively with parental authority.”
> 2. That “[t]he state ‘priesthood’ of educators are best able to rear the 
> child and prepare him for life, viewed as statist life.”
> 3. That “Statist education is alone ‘objective’ and hence true, the state 
> having the impartiality and transcendence of a god.”
>
> Accordingly, he says, statist education is an “entrance into the true 
> catholicity of the civil religion of the modern state.” Established 
> ostensibly to teach our children, public schools in America socialize and 
> shape children to be allegedly upstanding citizens in an allegedly 
> participatory democracy. They normalize the idea that the State is the 
> paternal authority to which biological parents must turn for the rearing 
> and nurturing of their children.
>
> As go the children, so goes society. Rushdoony himself puts it this way: 
> “If the child educationally belongs to the state and to its care or 
> oversight, it is then a far lesser thing to ask that property be likewise 
> surrendered to the state.” Why should we be surprised when the state 
> exercises its eminent domain powers if that which is, or ought to be, most 
> precious to us ­ our children ­ has been voluntarily handed over to the 
> government? In other words, public schools are merely one mechanism among 
> many for the State to supervise and discipline our children into 
> psychological obedience and conformity so that it might insert itself into 
> other areas of life, including private ownership. Children become adults 
> and pass their inculcated values onto their children; the cycle continues, 
> the State ever-increasing its power over time, involving itself with 
> matters once thought to be outside the province of government.
>
> “Since in the civil religion the state is god, and there is no right 
> beyond the state (or the state’s concept of its goal and the goal for 
> humanity),” explains Rushdoony, “it follows that right is what the state 
> requires, and the normal or healthy man that which the society requires man 
> to be.” The control of a few zealots can be preserved only when and if a 
> vast majority can be trained into docile submission to compulsive standards 
> and regulations, persistently instructed to accept certain ideas and habits 
> as unconditionally true, and versed in the rhetoric of Statism and punished 
> for any deviation therewith. The State offers lavish incentives and rewards 
> (public loans, scholarships, grants, public sector jobs, benefits) for 
> proselytizing on behalf of its religion.
>
> Acts 5:29 teaches that it is proper to disobey State dictates that are 
> contrary to God’s instruction. The first two commandments listed in Exodus 
> 20 prohibit our present idolization of the State as well as the 
> iconography, narratives, and rituals that seek to sanctify and validate the 
> religion of Statism. The history of Western Civilization teaches that 
> Christians have, at various times and to various degrees since the age of 
> Christ, struggled against oppressive State power. Resisting the public 
> education system in America is not just a good idea; it is a duty.
>
> Not only proponents of Christian private schools and homeschooling are 
> aware of the increasing messianic justifications for, and celebrations of, 
> state education. As early as 1909, Friedrich Nietzsche, who despised 
> Christianity, acknowledged that government subsidized education was meant 
> to condition the masses into following “the guiding star of the State!” 
> That so many politicians and teachers fail to acknowledge this fact 
> suggests they are either willingly complicit or thoroughly indoctrinated.
>
> Fifty years after publishing *The Messianic Character of American 
> Education*, Rushdoony remains relevant and perhaps even more important 
> than he was then. His words endure as a frightening reminder of what needs 
> to be done: “There is no escaping this dilemma of [educational] 
> socialization, with its subversion of learning to the goals of the state, 
> *except by the radical disestablishment of the schools, the separation of 
> school and state*.”  May the disestablishment and separation begin.
>
> http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/07/allen-mendenhall/the-public-schools-are-a-nasty-religion/
>  
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to