"But what we don’t expect is for the
average score of Republicans to be a dismal 70.64 percent. Eight
Republicans have a failing score; that is, below 60. Eleven of them have
a 60just barely above failing. This means that 19 Republicans scored
lower than the 2 Democrats who received a passing score. Only 1
Republican senator, Jeff Flake of Arizona, scored a 100. The darling of
conservatives, Marco Rubio, only scored an 80that is a B-. Even Utah’s
Orin Hatch scored an 80. Poor John McCainhe scored a 56. I wonder how
many conservatives voted for him for president in 2008? Would McCain have
been any better than Obama? I argue no
here
."
How “Conservative” Is Your
Senator?
By Laurence M. Vance
August 14, 2013
One of the main tenets of conservatism is supposed to be fidelity to the
Constitution. Let’s see how Republicans in the U.S. Senate who tout their
conservatism at every election measure up.
Democrats have controlled the U.S. Senate since the 110th Congress began
in January of 2007. The Senate is currently composed of 52 Democrats, 46
Republicans, and 2 Independents (Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Angus King
of Maine) who both caucus with the Democrats. But even though Republicans
in the Senate are the opposition party, they aren’t living up to the
conservative principles they claim to adhere to.
So, my question for every Republican is simply this: How “conservative”
is your senator?
Fortunately, this is an easy thing to determine. But since most
Republicans don’t bother to check the conservative credentials of those
whom they put in office, I will do it for them.
Every three months, the New American magazine publishes a
congressional scorecard based on the Constitution called “The Freedom
Index.” It rates congressmen “based on their adherence to constitutional
principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national
sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign
entanglements.” The
first index for the 113th Congress has just been released.
Since Republicans are always talking about their fiscal conservatism and
fidelity to the Constitution, “The Freedom Index” seems like a good way
to put them to the test.
A senator’s score is determined by dividing his good; that is,
constitutional, votes on ten representative bills by the total number of
good and bad votes he cast, and then multiplying the answer by 100 to
turn it into a percent. The closer a senator’s score is to 100, the more
“conservative” he is.
The votes tracked this time were concerning Hurricane Sandy disaster
relief, increasing the debt limit, the Keystone XL Pipeline, a
balanced-budget resolution, the UN Arms Trade Treaty, an “assault
weapons” ban, a high-capacity clip ban, Internet sales tax, product
labeling for genetically modified food, and farm programs (including
funding for food stamps).
The average Senate score is 41 percent. Only two Democrats (Begich of
Alaska and Manchin of West Virginia) received a passing score of 60 or
above. A few Democrats scored a big fat zeroas we might expect.
But what we don’t expect is for the average score of Republicans to be a
dismal 70.64 percent. Eight Republicans have a failing score; that is,
below 60. Eleven of them have a 60just barely above failing. This means
that 19 Republicans scored lower than the 2 Democrats who received a
passing score. Only 1 Republican senator, Jeff Flake of Arizona, scored a
100. The darling of conservatives, Marco Rubio, only scored an 80that is
a B-. Even Utah’s Orin Hatch scored an 80. Poor John McCainhe scored a
56. I wonder how many conservatives voted for him for president in 2008?
Would McCain have been any better than Obama? I argue no
here.
Senate Republicans would have scored even worse had “The Freedom Index”
tracked any votes this time that related to foreign affairs. Just look at
the recent 86-13
vote in the Senate against Rand Paul’s proposal to cut off foreign
aid to Egypt. The Republican vote was 33-13.
It is a myth that electing more Republicans to the Senate so that the GOP
can control both houses of Congress would make the country better off. If
you think Republicans are bad as the opposition party, you ought to see
how bad they are when they are in the majority. Republicans controlled
both houses of Congress and the presidency for over four years under
George W. Bush and what did it do for America but put us on the road to
bigger government, further indebtedness, increased spending, and more
tyranny. Almost every bad policy of Obama can be traced back to the Bush
years.
But it’s not just the national government. We have had more Republicans
elected to office on the federal, state, and local levels in the last
twenty years than at any time in recent memory and probably not since
Reconstruction. Republicans even control the House, Senate, and
governorship in several states. Yet, we have more government, more
government debt, more government spending, and more government tyranny at
all levels than ever beforeEPA, TSA, DHS, NSA, DEA, IRS, FBI, foreign
military interventions, drone strikes, drug war, police brutality,
etc.
Why on earth would anyone, and especially libertarians, think that voting
Republican at any level would solve any problem or make things any
better?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/08/laurence-m-vance/how-conservative-is-your-senator/
--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
