http://www.moneynews.com/Newsfront/moore-sequester-success-expectations/2013/08/12/id/519921?s=al&promo_code=148C4-1
****

** **
Sequester Has Already Succeeded Beyond Expectations ****

Monday, August 12, 2013 12:23 PM****

*By: Dan Weil*****

The automatic government spending cuts that drew howls of protest from
Washington when they began March 1 have turned out splendidly, says Stephen
Moore, a Wall Street Journal editorial board member.

"The biggest underreported story out of Washington this year is that the
federal budget is shrinking and much more than anyone in either party
expected," he wrote
Sunday<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323477604579000933006361834.html?mod=ITP_opinion_0>
.

Annual spending peaked at about $3.6 trillion in fiscal 2011. Many experts
had expected outlays would reach $4 trillion by 2014, Moore reported.


Instead, spending dropped to $3.54
trillion<http://www.cbo.gov/publication/44172>in fiscal 2012, and is
on track to dip below $3.45 trillion by Sept. 30,
the end of fiscal 2013. That would represent the first time government
spending has decreased for two straight years since the end of the Korean
War, Moore noted.

"This reversal from the spending binge in 2009 and 2010 began with the
debt-ceiling agreement between Mr. Obama and House Speaker John Boehner in
2011," Moore said.

That accord included $2 trillion in spending caps for 10 years and spawned
the sequester, which will save more than $50 billion this fiscal year.

"As long as Republicans don't foolishly undo this amazing progress by
agreeing to Mr. Obama's demands for a 'balanced approach' to the 2014
budget in exchange for calling off the sequester, additional expenditure
cuts will continue automatically," he added.

"In other words, Mr. Obama has inadvertently chained himself to fiscal
restraints that could flatten federal spending for the rest of his
presidency."

Moore said a return to normal economic growth could send the budget deficit
lower at least through 2015.

"Already the deficit has fallen from its Mount Everest peak of 10.2 percent
of gross domestic product in 2009, to about 4 percent this year . . . At
least for now, the great Washington spending blitz of the Obama first term
is over."

Moore, noting that half or more of the spending cuts have come from
defense, said the military budget as a percentage of GDP is set to reach
its lowest level since the Clinton administration.

"These deep cutbacks could be dangerous to national security, but as the
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were winding down, defense would have been cut
under any scenario," he said.

"The sequester cuts in annual budgets for the military, education,
transportation and other discretionary programs have also been an
underappreciated success, with none of the anticipated negative
consequences," Moore continued.

Moore cited the sequester as being responsible for curtailing runaway
spending on programs long supported by liberals, such as the National
Endowment for the Arts, the Environmental Protection Agency and green
energy subsidies, and National Public Radio.

"Liberals had hoped that re-electing Mr. Obama, the most pro-spending
president since LBJ, would unleash another four years of Great Society
government expansion. Instead, spending caps and the sequester are
squashing these progressive dreams," he stated, admonishing Republicans to
simply stay the course in their upcoming budget negotiations with the White
House.

"All Republicans need to do is enforce the budget laws Mr. Obama has
already agreed to."****

** **


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to