http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xHbEdxJMo
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:36:43 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/henry-waxman-leads-newest-attack-on-guns/**** > > ** ** > WEAPONS OF CHOICE**** Henry Waxman leads newest attack on guns**** Plan > would ban 'virtually any part used to build a semi-automatic weapon'**** > > [image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/05/gun_barrel.jpg]**** > > A few months back, Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama > had Democrats bring into Congress a long list of new gun laws, restrictions > and regulations, only to see them slapped down.**** > > You didn’t think they were done with their gun-control plan, did you?**** > > The newest move comes from Rep. Henry Waxman and several others who have > introduced H.R. 2910, the “Gun Violence Prevention and Reduction Act of > 2013.” <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr2910/text>**** > > It is getting attention among bloggers who monitor gun rules already, > because of what they fear is going to be happening with it.**** > > At Freedom > Outpost,<http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/new-bill-would-ban-ar-15-receivers-barrels-and-any-necessary-parts-to-assemble-a-semi-automatic-firearm/#pfkOSBU286vAITiv.99>Tim > Brown writes that the plan “would ban the sale and possession of 80 > percent AR-15 receivers.”**** > > “However, the way the legislation reads, it actually bans much more than > receivers. It appears to include virtually any part used to build a > semi-automatic weapon.”**** > > He wrote that the ban is a little deceptive, because the part that is > referenced “is one that is not considered a firearm because it still > requires some basic machine work before it is ready to be used in building > a firearm.”**** > > He said the possibility with an 80 percent completed lower version, versus > a finished product, is that the finished product is required to have a > serial number.**** > > “There is no need for the gun to have a serial number or be registered as > long as it remains in your possession for personal use,” he notes.**** > > But he notes instead of plugging a “hole in the law,” Waxman aims for much > more.**** > > Specifically, the proposal makes it “unlawful” for any person “to sell, > offer for sale, manufacture for sale, or import into the United for sale, > to a consumer – an assault weapon parts kit.”**** > > *Understand the real morality behind gun rights with “Shooting Back: The > Right and Duty of Self-Defense,” from the WND > Superstore!<http://superstore.wnd.com/sales/BUNDLES/The-Shooting-Back-Bundle_2> > ***** > > That includes “any part or combination of parts not designed and intended > for repair or replacement but designed and intended to enable a consumer > who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a semiautomatic assault > weapon.”**** > > “Basically, this ends up targeting any rifle part that can be used to > build a firearm,” he noted. “In theory, any parts on a firearm are > essentially covered with this legislation.”**** > > He noted it’s now in committee, with only Democrat sponsors.**** > > The bill itself proposes that it is “to protect American children and > their families from the epidemic of gun violence by banning access to > certain weapons…”**** > > In a recent commentary from WND CEO Joseph Farah,<http://wnd.com/?p=483805>he > cited a video that reveals Holder’s own plans for weapons in America: > **** > > And it recently was discovered that Democratic strategists have drafted a > how-to manual on manipulating the public’s emotions toward gun control in > the aftermath of a major shooting.**** > > “A high-profile gun-violence incident temporarily draws more people into > the conversation about gun violence,” asserts the guide. “*We should rely > on emotionally powerful language, feelings and images to bring home the > terrible impact of gun violence.”* > > The 80-page document titled “Preventing Gun Violence Through Effective > Messaging,”<http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/748675/gun-violencemessaging-guide-pdf-1.pdf>also > > *urges gun-control advocates to use images of frightening-looking guns*and > shooting scenes to make their point. > **** > > “The most powerful time to communicate is when concern and emotions are > running at their peak,” the guide insists. “The debate over gun violence in > America is periodically punctuated by high-profile gun violence incidents > including Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, the Trayvon Martin killing, > Aurora and Oak Creek. When an incident such as these attracts sustained > media attention, it creates a unique climate for our communications > efforts.”**** > > The manual offers a step-by-step guide on *how to stir up sympathy for > victims, arrest the “moral authority” from opposing groups like the > National Rifle Association and keep the debate emotional instead of > allowing facts to interfere.* > > “Essentially it’s a how-to book on inciting a moral panic,” comments James > Taranto of the Wall Street Journal.**** > > The guidebook, discovered by the Second Amendment Foundation and reported > by Paul Bedard of the Washington Examiner, was prepared by four strategists > including Al Quinlan of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, which touts it > is “committed to progressive goals,” and includes among its clients the > American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood and Mayors Against > Illegal Guns, among dozens of other left-leaning organizations.**** > > Jeff Knox, director of the Firearms Coalition, warns gun-control campaigns > like this specifically direct advocates to shy away from facts because > they’re based on trying to fool the public.**** > > “That gun-control playbook is full of lies,” Knox told WND, “with the > biggest one being in the opening statement that they have the facts and > logic on their side, but that we use emotion and money to advance our cause. > **** > > “The opposite is true and demonstrated by the suggestions in the book,” he > continued. “They depend on emotion and fear, because reality does not > support their position. Gun control doesn’t work. It never has. If it did, > there would be ample evidence, but the only evidence they have is so weak > and suspect, even anti-gun panels for the Centers for Disease Control and > the Science Foundation couldn’t find any strong evidence of gun-control > efficacy.”**** > > *Now read the single most definitive book on duping the masses – straight > from the files of the KGB – in “Disinformation” and its companion > documentary, “Disinformation: The Secret Strategies to Destroy the West,” > from the WND > Superstore!<http://superstore.wnd.com/Welcome/Disinformation-Hardcover-Disinformation-DVD-BUNDLE> > ***** > > ** ** > > > __._,_.___ > > > > > > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
![http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/05/gun_barrel.jpg]****](http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/05/gun_barrel.jpg]****){kind=link}