** **

** **

*[image: HumanEvents] <http://www.humanevents.com/>**TODAY IS: AUGUST 21,
2013 | 5:12 PM***
ARAB SPRING: WORST SOAP EVER****

[image: Arab Spring: Worst soap ever]****

*By:* *Ann Coulter* <http://www.humanevents.com/author/ann-coulter/>
*8/21/2013 06:10 PM*****

I didn’t care for the “Arab Spring,” but the “Arab Summer” is a blockbuster!
****

Liberals’ rosy predictions for Egypt’s Islamic revolution didn’t turn out
as planned. Who could have guessed that howling mobs in Tahrir Square in
2011 would fail to produce a peaceful democracy?****

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak had supported U.S. policy, used his
military to fight Muslim extremists and recognized Israel’s right to exist.
So naturally, Obama told him he had to go.****

Let’s review what liberals said at the time about that glorious people’s
revolution — only from The *New York Times*:****

– “(Egyptian) Officials blamed the Muslim Brotherhood (for the protests). …
Even if the Brotherhood had a role — the group denies it; the truth seems
more complex — it is easy to understand why Egyptians are fed up.”
(Editorial: “Mr. Mubarak Is Put on Notice,” Jan. 26, 2011)****

– “The mistake, which still emanates from think tanks stocked with
neoconservatives, is assuming that democracy can come at the end of sword.
… Now that some of the dominoes appear to be falling, this has more to do
with Facebook and the frustrations of young, educated adults who can’t earn
enough money to marry than it does with tanks rolling into Baghdad, or
naive neocons guiding the State Department.” (Timothy Egan, “Bonfire of
American Vanities,” Feb. 3, 2011)****

– “It’s time to be clear: Mubarak’s time is up.” (Roger Cohen, “Hosni
Mubarak Agonistes,” Feb. 4, 2011)****

– “What is unfolding in Arab streets is not an assertion of religious
reaction but a yearning for democracy with all its burdens and rewards.”
(Ray Takeyh, “What Democracy Could Bring,” Feb. 4, 2011)****

Oops! Within less than a year, we found out that the truth wasn’t
“complex”: The Muslim Brotherhood was behind the revolution. They rigged an
election and were planning to implement Sharia law — until the Egyptian
military stepped in on behalf of the people this year and removed the
Brotherhood’s Mohammed Morsi as president.****

In Arab countries, at least, it seems that democracy can come only “at the
end of a sword.”****

Also in 2011, Obama ordered air strikes in Libya against Moammar Gadhafi —
at the precise moment Gadhafi was no longer a threat to anyone. After Bush
invaded Iraq, Gadhafi promptly gave up his nuclear program and invited U.N.
weapons inspectors in to prove it. Apparently, he wasn’t interested in
becoming the next Saddam Hussein.****

Obama’s bombing of Gadhafi was also enthusiastically supported at the
Times. Gadhafi, you see, had killed hundreds of his own people. Meanwhile,
President Bashar Hafez al-Assad of Syria can preside over the slaughter of
more than 100,000 of his people since that time without a cross word from
the left.****

Libyan people proceeded to stalk and kill Gadhafi in the desert (video on
YouTube). A year later, the happy people of Libya murdered our ambassador
and three other Embassy staff. But as Hillary said, “What difference, at
this point, does it make?”****

After all their carping about the Iraq War, you’d think liberals would have
waited a few years before getting sentimental about democracy in Egypt and
Libya. At least democracy is working in Iraq, despite Obama’s attempt to
wreck it by withdrawing all U.S. troops. (We still have troops in Germany —
but not in Bush’s Iraq.) Still, our ambassador wasn’t assassinated in
Baghdad.****

Speaking of which, what is the geopolitical strategy behind Obama’s sending
more troops to Afghanistan? The 9/11 attack was not committed by
Afghanistan. That country has no history of exporting terrorism. Afghans
have traditionally been the invaded, not the invaders. They’re too busy
herding goats.****

The 9/11 attack was planned by foreigners who had decamped to Afghanistan.
Although the Taliban was eager for al-Qaida’s help in fighting the Northern
Alliance, it had no interest in attacking America. Mullah Omar dissented
from Osama bin Laden on that brilliant idea.****

It was one thing to go in and wipe out the Taliban after 9/11 in
retaliation for their allowing bin Laden to set up shop there, but what was
the point after that? Three months into President Bush’s war in
Afghanistan, we had accomplished all we were ever going to accomplish in
that godforsaken area of the world.****

To quote one of liberals’ favorite arguments against the Iraq War: What
does victory in Afghanistan look like?****

The one place Obama should have intervened was Iran. The moderate,
pro-Western, educated Iranian people were being shot in the street in 2010
for protesting an election stolen by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a messianic
lunatic in a Members Only jacket. There was a clear alternative in that
case that didn’t involve the Muslim Brotherhood, to wit: the actual winner
of the election.****

But Obama turned his back on the Iranians. Democrats are so opposed to
promoting the United States’ interests around the globe, it doesn’t occur
to them that, sometimes, our national interests might coincide with the
interests of other people.****

Liberals made fun of Sarah Palin for not being able to define “the Bush
doctrine.” Can Obama tell us what “the Obama doctrine” is? Leap in only to
make the rest of the world a more dangerous place? At least Egyptians are
safe now, thanks to their military and no thanks to Obama.****


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to