We can't even secure our own southern border, but yet somehow, the Obama 
Administration and Secretary of State Kerry, (who clearly lied to the 
Congressional panel yesterday!)  seem to think that we can go into Syrian 
civil war and make some kind of differnce over there?
---
it's good to see you ask this question.

I have seen both government officials and republicans questioning the 
interventionist policy more in the last 2-3 months than in the last 2-3 
years.

Wilson and the US interventionist policy:
http://sun.menloschool.org/~chanson/apush/rp/ccww.pdf
s. It was because Wilson’s blind faith and eagernessto establish democracy 
and 
peace everywhere allowed him to be successfully swayed by the members of 
his administration.
This change in American diplomatic policy from neutrality to intervention 
was a momentous
change in American foreign affairs. Power is only attained by the 
acquisition of power from other
weaker empires, and so when the United States undertook a more active 
foreign policy, it was the
catalyst for America’s rise in the world as a superpower. However, I wonder 
at times would have
happened if a different course was taken by Wilson—what would have occurred 
if Wilson was
victorious in having his moral principles become the guiding force of his 
major policy decisions?
Is it ever possible for diplomacy to be governed by ethical policy and 
romantic ideals? In a sense,
Woodrow Wilson has already answered this question for us: ideals can only 
become a guiding
force to diplomatic policy as long they are applied in the first place.



On Thursday, September 5, 2013 8:48:45 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> We can't even secure our own southern border, but yet somehow, the Obama 
> Administration and Secretary of State Kerry, (who clearly lied to the 
> Congressional panel yesterday!)  seem to think that we can go into Syrian 
> civil war and make some kind of differnce over there?  When WE KNOW that 
> those who we suggest to aid are Al Queada?   The very same entity that we 
> are currently fighting in Afghanistan?
>  
> Has our government gone completely bat-shit crazy?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:31 AM, plainolamerican 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Ouch!!!
>>
>> Is dropping bombs as bad as using nerve gas?
>>
>> Is the US supporting the wrong side of a civil war again? I'm quite 
>> certain the xians would think so.
>>
>> Our tax dollars and soldiers are being misused again. It's time to remove 
>> the interventionists from our government by any means necessary.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 5, 2013 7:41:14 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>> *Our Heroic Fighting Men and Women . . .
>>> *Thomas DiLorenzo
>>> September 04, 2013
>>>
>>> . . . sitting safely in  gigantic warships twenty miles or more from 
>>> Syria, protected by dozens of fighter jets, are about to push a few 
>>> buttons, video game style, to launch thousand-pound bombs on Syrian cities 
>>> that will inevitably murder innocent women and children, many of whom have 
>>> relatives living and working in the U.S.  It�s The Battle of Gettysburg 
>>> all over again!  All together now:  �Mine eyes have seen the glory of the 
>>> coming of the Lord . . .�
>>>
>>> Upon returning home, OUR HEROES will stroll through our airports, still 
>>> wearing  camouflage, and be greeted with applause and chants of �thank 
>>> you for your service to our country� by the hordes of  ignorant and 
>>> shockingly gullible Boobus Americanus.  This will be the green light for 
>>> President Hillary Clinton to finally drop a nuclear bomb on Iran as her 
>>> first official act as dictator-in-chief.  Bill Kristol will celebrate in 
>>> the *War Street Journal* that �the realm� has finally been 
>>> �secured.�
>>>  
>>  -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>  
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to