Or as I prefer to call them:  Retarded Turds.

http://jewishworldreview.com/0913/bernie_g.php3****

** **

Sept. 16, 2013/ 12 Tishrei, 5774 ****

*Obama's Greatest Asset: Clueless Americans *****

By Bernard Goldberg ****

 H.L. Mencken made Andy Rooney look like Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm. Both
gave curmudgeons a bad name. But Andy was shrew; he played to Middle
Americans. He would say something like, "Have you ever wondered why we
collect string?" — and they would swoon. He was one of them, they thought.
I knew Andy. He wasn't one of them and I suspect he didn't think much of
them. Mencken, on the other hand, made no secret of his disdain for
ordinary Americans, whom he saw as hopeless dolts. ****

Mencken, a Baltimore newspaperman, once said this about his fellow
Americans: ****

*"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual
ignorance. No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the
records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by
underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people." *

Pretty cold. But given that the great masses of plain people elected Barack
Obama twice, maybe H.L. was onto something. ****

They elected him the first time because he was a historical figure. He
wasn't Mondale or Dukakis or Gore or Kerry. He was young and cool and black
and liberal. And Americans wanted to make history. ****

But the second time around? Unemployment was high, a big majority of
Americans thought we were on the wrong track, the economic recovery was
anemic, and most Americans had little confidence that things would get
better anytime soon. ****

Yet he won again. So how do we explain it? Yes, you could pin it on a weak
Republican candidate, but maybe Mencken was right. Maybe Americans — or
enough of them anyway — are just not that smart. ****

I've been thinking about this the past few days as I, along with everyone
else, watched how the president has bungled the Syrian situation. First,
during his campaign for re-election, he needlessly draws a red line,
warning Syria that the use of chemical weapons is something the United
States would not tolerate. ****

So far, there have been no repercussions. ****

Then, a week or so ago, after the world witnessed gruesome videos of dead
children who had been exposed to poison gas, presumably the work of the
Syrian regime, Secretary of State John Kerry makes a forceful statement
about Bashar al-Assad's immorality and makes clear that military action is
coming. ****

Twenty-four hours later the president, who said he didn't need
Congressional approval for a military attack, decides he wants Congress in
on the decision. The president says he still wants to attack Syria, but
that there's no rush. ****

John Kerry, mindful that Congress is as war-weary as the American people,
explains that any U.S. action would be an "unbelievably small, limited kind
of effort," prompting groans and guffaws from all over the place. ****

Enter Vladimir Putin, who comes riding to Mr. Obama's rescue — rescue, that
is, from a certain no vote in the House and perhaps another no vote in the
Democratically-controlled Senate. Putin pushes the idea — originally put
forth, tongue in check, by Secretary of State Kerry — that Russia would
work with the Syrian regime to put their chemical arsenal under
international control "for subsequent destruction." ****

*The result of all this is a president who comes off looking like more like
a community organizer than a commander-in-chief. I keep waiting for Ted
Mack to come out and say: Welcome friends to the latest edition of the
Amateur Hour. *

At heart, Mr. Obama may or may not be a nice guy. Reasonable people may
disagree on that. But when it comes to being president, he's clearly in way
over his head. ****

In a piece for Commentary that runs under the headline, "The Collapse of
the Obama Presidency," Peter Wehner makes that very point. This is how he
puts it: ****

"How bad has 2013 been for Barack Obama? Let us count the ways. ****

"In the first year of his second term, the president has failed on
virtually every front. He put his prestige on the line to pass federal
gun-control legislation—and lost. He made climate change a central part of
his inaugural address—and nothing has happened. The president went
head-to-head with Republicans on sequestration—and he failed. He's been
forced to delay implementation of the employer mandate, a key feature of
the Affordable Care Act. ObamaCare is more unpopular than ever, and it's
turning out to be a 'train wreck' (to quote Democratic Senator Max Baucus)
in practice. The most recent jobs report was the worst in a year, with the
Obama recovery already qualifying as a historically weak one. Immigration
reform is going nowhere. And then there's Syria, which has turned out to be
an epic disaster." ****

Barack Obama is the man who told us that his candidacy would "ring out
across this land as a hymn that will heal this nation, repair this world,
make this time different than all the rest." No wonder his acolytes thought
he was the messiah. ****

So why do I think that if he were constitutionally able to run for a third
term, despite everything, there's a good chance he'd win? Let's turn again
to Mr. Mencken and that observation he made many years ago for an answer. **
**

"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual
ignorance. No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the
records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by
underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people." *
***

Or to put it in a slightly different way: *Never underestimate the power of
stupid people in large groups.* ****

** **


__._,_.






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to