http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0913/steyn09163.php3****

** **

Sept. 16, 2013/ 12 Tishrei, 5774 ****

*U.S. at risk of being laughed off world stage *****

By Mark Steyn ****

For generations, eminent New York Times wordsmiths have swooned over
foreign strongmen, from Walter Duranty's Pulitzer-winning paeans to the
Stalinist utopia to Thomas L. Friedman's more recent effusions to the
“enlightened” Chinese Politburo. So it was inevitable that the
cash-strapped Times would eventually figure it might as well eliminate the
middle man and hire the enlightened strongman direct. Hence Vladimir
Putin's impressive debut on the op-ed page this week.****

It pains me to have to say that the versatile Vlad makes a much better
columnist than I'd be a KGB torturer. His “plea for caution” was an
exquisitely masterful parody of liberal bromides far better than most of
the Times' in-house writers can produce these days. He talked up the United
Nations and international law, was alarmed by U.S. military intervention,
and worried that America was no longer seen as “a model of democracy” but,
instead, as erratic cowboys “cobbling coalitions together under the slogan
‘you're either with us or against us.'” He warned against chest-thumping
about “American exceptionalism,” pointing out that, just like in America's
grade-school classrooms, in the international community everyone is
exceptional in his own way. ****

All this the average Times reader would find entirely unexceptional.
Indeed, it's the sort of thing a young Sen. Obama would have been writing
himself a mere five years ago. Putin even appropriated the 2008 Obama's
core platitude: “We must work together to keep this hope alive.” In the
biographical tag at the end, the Times editors informed us: “Vladimir V.
Putin is the President of Russia.” But by this stage, one would not have
been surprised to see: “Vladimir V. Putin is the author of the new memoir,
'The Audacity of Vlad,' which he will be launching at a campaign breakfast
in Ames, Iowa, this weekend.” ****

As Iowahawk ingeniously summed it up, Putin is “now just basically doing
donuts in Obama's front yard.” It's not just that he can stitch him up at
the G-8, G-20, Gee-don't-tell-me-you're-coming-back-for-more, and turn the
leader of the free world into the planet's designated decline-and-fall-guy,
but he can slough off crappy third-rate telepromptered mush better than you
community-organizer schmucks, too. Let's take it as read that Putin didn't
write this himself, any more than Obama wrote that bilge he was drowning in
Tuesday night, when he took to the airwaves to argue in favor of the fierce
urgency of doing something about gassed Syrian moppets but not just yet.
Both guys are using writers, but Putin's are way better than Obama's – and
English isn't even their first language. With this op-ed, Tsar Vlad is
telling Obama: The world knows you haven't a clue how to play the Great
Game or even what it is, but the only parochial solipsistic dweeby game you
do know how to play I can kick your butt all over town on, too.****

This is what happens when you elect someone because he looks cool standing
next to Jay-Z. Putin is cool mainly in the sense that Yakutsk in February
is cool. In American pop-culture terms, he is a faintly ridiculous figure,
with his penchant for homoerotic shirtlessness, his nipples entering the
room like an advance security team; the celebrities he attracts are like
some rerun channel way up the end of the dial: Goldie Hawn was in the crowd
when Putin, for no apparent reason, sang “I found my thrill on Blueberry
Hill,” which Goldie seemed to enjoy. In reality, Putin finds his thrill by
grabbing Obama's blueberries and squeezing hard. Cold beats cool. ****

Charles Crawford, Britain's former ambassador in Serbia and Poland, called
last Monday “the worst day for U.S. and wider Western diplomacy since
records began.” Obama set it in motion at a press conference last year by
drawing his famous “red line.” Unlike, say, the undignified scrums around
the Canadian and Australian prime ministers, Obama doesn't interact enough
with the press for it to become normal or real. So at this rare press
conference he was, as usual, playing a leader who's giving a press
conference. The “red line” line sounds like the sort of thing a guy playing
a president in a movie would say – maybe Harrison Ford in “Air Force One”
or Michael Douglas in “The American President.” It never occurred to him
that, out there in the world beyond the Republic of Cool, he'd set an
actual red line and some dime-store dictator would cross it with impunity.
So, for most of the past month, the bipartisan foreign policy establishment
has assured us that, regardless of whether it will accomplish anything, we
now have to fire missiles at a sovereign nation because “America's
credibility is at stake.”****

This is diplomacy for post-moderns: The more you tell the world that you
have to bomb Syria to preserve your credibility, the less credible any
bombing raid on Syria is going to be – especially when your leaders are
reduced to negotiating the precise degree of military ineffectiveness
necessary to maintain that credibility. In London this week, John Kerry,
America's secretary of state, capped his own impressive four-decade
accumulation of magnificently tin-eared sound bites by assuring his
audience that the military devastation the superpower would wreak on Assad
would be “unbelievably small.” Actually, the problem is that it will be
all-too-believably small. The late Milton Berle, when challenged on his
rumored spectacular endowment, was wont to respond that he would take out
only just enough to win. In London, Kerry took out just enough to lose.****

In the Obama era, to modify Teddy Roosevelt, America chatters unceasingly
and carries an unbelievably small stick. In this, the wily Putin saw an
opening, and offered a “plan” so absurd that even Obama's court eunuchs in
the media had difficulty swallowing it. A month ago, Assad was a reviled
war criminal and Putin his arms dealer. Now, Putin is the honest broker and
Obama's partner for peace, and the war criminal is at the negotiating table
with his chances of survival better than they've looked in a year. On the
same day the U.S. announced it would supply the Syrian rebels with light
arms and advanced medical kits, Russia announced it would give Assad's
buddies in Iran the S-300 ground-to-air weapons system and another nuclear
reactor.****


Putin has pulled off something incredible: He's gotten Washington to anoint
him as the international community's official peacemaker, even as he
assists Iran in going nuclear and keeping their blood-soaked Syrian client
in his presidential palace. Already, under the “peace process,” Putin and
Assad are running rings around the dull-witted Kerry, whose Botoxicated
visage embodies all too well the expensively embalmed state of the
superpower.****

As for Putin's American exceptionalism crack, he was attacking less the
concept than Obama's opportunist invocation of it as justification for
military action in Syria. Nevertheless, Democrats and Republicans alike
took the bait. Eager to mend bridges with the base after his amnesty bill,
Marco Rubio insisted at National Review that America was still, like,
totally exceptional.****

Sorry, this doesn't pass muster even as leaden, staffer-written codswallop.
It's not the time – not when you're a global joke, not when every American
ally is cringing with embarrassment at the amateurishness of the past
month. Nobody, friend or foe, wants to hear about American exceptionalism
when the issue is American ineffectualism. On CBS, Bashar Assad called the
U.S. government “a social-media administration.” He's got a better writer
than Obama, too. America is in danger of being the first great power to be
laughed off the world stage. When the president's an irrelevant narcissist,
and his secretary of state's a vainglorious buffoon, Marco Rubio shouldn't
be telling the world, don't worry, the other party's a joke, too.****

** **


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to