Of course they do.****

** **

B****

** **

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/head-islamic-bloc-wants-his-group-have-permanent-seat-un-security
****

** **
Head of Islamic Bloc Wants His Group to Have Permanent Seat on U.N.
Security Council ****

*September 17, 2013 - 4:19 AM *
*
------------------------------
*

*By Patrick Goodenough <http://cnsnews.com/source/patrick-goodenough>*

*Subscribe to Patrick Goodenough <http://cnsnews.com/source/72503/feed> RSS*

[image: Obama-OIC] <http://cnsnews.com/image/obama-oic>****

Organization of Islamic Cooperation secretary-general Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
meets with President Obama at the White House in April 2011. (Photo: OIC)***
*

(CNSNews.com) – With key Muslim countries on the rise and the Muslim
population on track to exceed a quarter of the planet’s projected total
population by 2030, the Islamic world deserves a permanent seat on the U.N.
Security Council, says Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)
Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.****

In a speech this week, he laid out his vision for the future of the bloc of
Islamic states as his eight-year term at the helm draws to an end.****

Speaking at the Russian Foreign Ministry’s international relations
institute, Ihsanoglu said the 57-member OIC already comprised the biggest
voting bloc at the United Nations and it was time it acquired “a new
position.”****

“During the first reconsideration of the reform in the U.N., I think there
should be a seat for OIC in the Security Council,” he said. “If you look to
the structure of the Security Council of today, you have the P5 [permanent
five] and there are representatives of different civilizations, different
cultures, political powers.”****

“But you won’t find representative of more than 1.6 billion people of
Muslim world.”****

The U.N.’s top decision-making body currently has five permanent,
veto-wielding members – the U.S., Britain, France, China and Russia – and
10 non-permanent members serving for two-year periods each.****

A campaign to reform the council by expanding its permanent membership has
been struggling to gain traction for decades, plagued by regional
jealousies, competing interests and an unwillingness among the existing
permanent members to extend veto power to any newcomers.****

Even so, the countries most often viewed as contenders for any new
permanent seats – India, Japan, Brazil, Germany and South Africa – exclude
Muslim nations.****

No one Islamic country has emerged as an obvious addition to that group,
although Australia a decade ago backed a permanent seat for
Indonesia<http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/australia-wants-new-members-un-security-council>,
the world’s fourth most populous nation. The idea of Egypt getting a
permanent seat circulated several years ago but instability there since
2011 will not have won it much support beyond the region. The same would
likely apply to Pakistan.****

Other larger Islamic countries either have a muted international profile
(Bangladesh) or are too controversial (Iran). Smaller countries with an
outsized profile (Qatar) have rivals within the bloc. And Turkey’s
performance as a non-permanent member in 2009-10 set off warning bells in
the West when it opposed an Iran sanctions resolution that was so
watered-down even Russia and China supported it.****

Ihsanoglu’s proposal for a permanent seat for the OIC would allow countries
within the bloc to rotate, rather than have a single one hold the position
in perpetuity.****

*OIC should have same status at UN as European Union*****

In his speech in Moscow, he also recalled that the European Union since
2011 has enjoyed an elevated status at the U.N.****

(The U.N. General Assembly that year voted to give the 27-member E.U. the
right to speak at the assembly, introduce proposals, circulate documents
etc., rights already enjoyed by individual E.U. member states.)****

Although he conceded that the E.U. has a different structure to that of the
OIC, Ihsanoglu said, “I think the status acquired by the E.U. in 2011 in
U.N. should also be acquired by the OIC.”****

While the E.U. is working on developing a “common foreign and security
policy” and has mechanisms for handling differences when they do arise, OIC
member-states are deeply split over numerous issues.****

The Syrian civil war and the political turmoil in Egypt are only the latest
crises to divide a bloc stretching from Latin America to South-East Asia
and encompassing rivalries including those between Sunnis and Shi’ites and
Arabs and Persians.****

Reflecting these divisions, Ihsanoglu was himself recently targeted for
harsh criticism when members of the Turkish government accused him of not
speaking out on the OIC’s behalf to condemn the ousting of Egyptian
President Mohammed Morsi, a Turkish ally, and the military’s crackdown on
the Muslim Brotherhood.****

Ihsanoglu is himself a Turk, but the OIC secretariat is based in Saudi
Arabia and has close ties to the Saudi monarchy. The Saudi rulers were
pleased to see Morsi go, and some Turkish critics suspected that
Ihsanoglu’s silence on the matter suggested he had become overly cozy with
his hosts.****

One of them, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdag, suggested that
Ihsanoglu resign, saying that the OIC was meant to defend the interests of
Islam, not those of “monarchs.”****

*A ‘promising’ Islamic future*****

Ihsanoglu became secretary-general of the OIC in January 2005 and is due to
retire at the end of this year. Under his leadership the bloc has become a
far more activist organization, wielding its clout at the U.N. and its
Human Rights Council and confronting the West over “Islamophobia” and the
“defamation” of religion.****

He told his Moscow audience that the future of the Islamic world was
“promising,” not only politically but also from economic and demographic
points of view.****

He cited the “next 11” – a group of countries identified by Goldman Sachs
as potential future growth markets after the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India,
China and South Africa) – and noted that seven of the 11 are Islamic
states: Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey.
(The others are Mexico, the Philippines, South Korea and Vietnam.)****

Ihsanoglu pointed to a Pew Research Center
report<http://www.pewforum.org/files/2011/01/FutureGlobalMuslimPopulation-WebPDF-Feb10.pdf>on
the future of the global Muslim population, which forecasts that the
Muslim population will grow at twice the rate of non-Muslims over the next
two decades – 1.5 percent per year compared to 0.7 percent per year.****

At that rate, Pew estimates that the number of Muslims will reach 2.2
billion by 2030 – 26.4 percent of the projected global population, up from
23.4 percent in 2010.****

** **


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to