Landlord nation: Since 2007 the US has added over 2,000,000 renter
households while losing 750,000 owner households. Rents rising in spite of
falling 
incomes.<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/landlord-nation-increase-renter-renting-households-us-rising-rents/>

After scouring the newly released Census data many things stood out but one
of them continues to reflect a growing disconnect in housing.  The US is
adding many more renter households.  This of course is occurring in spite
of record rising home
prices<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/leverage-based-economy-interest-only-loan-california-goldman-sachs-visa-dow/>.
For regular buyers, the mortgage market is still checking carefully for
income and other requirements yet “cash
buyers<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/cash-buyers-real-estate-all-cash-buyer-percent-of-market/>”
continue to be the dominant force in 2013.  In expensive areas like
California, more people are using jumbo loans.  Ironically, the market has
now adjusted once again to the Fed’s obtuse language on tapering.  While
this language might come off difficult to decipher, the stats are very
clear.  Over the last six years we have added millions of households as
renters.  What are the longer term implications of this?

*Renters versus owners*

I went ahead and pulled data from a few key years and the latest 2012
annual Census data:

[image: rent vs owner changes
census]<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/rent-vs-owner-changes-census.png>

The biggest change of course has come from the growth of renter
households.  2.1 million more families rent today than they did in 2007.
Even more telling, from 2011 to 2012 we added 1.1 million renting
households.  I think this is largely a reflection of the massive amount of
investor buying and Wall Street suddenly having a liking for rental
property<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/cash-buyers-real-estate-all-cash-buyer-percent-of-market/>.
Is this a positive trend?

For one, it is clear that rents overall are rising:

[image: us 
rents]<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/us-rents.png>

US rents are rising at about 3 percent annually, about twice the rate of
the overall CPI.  The problem with this is that the Census figures also
show that household incomes are falling.  So more money is now being
shelled out to rents.  Or if you are buying, more is going to your PITI
because home prices are now rising at an incredibly fast pace thanks to
investors flooding the market.  One thing is certain and that is more money
is being plowed into real estate and that isn’t necessarily a good thing.
Discretionary money is being earmarked for housing.

This is occurring under the context of falling incomes:

[image: 
MedianHouseholdIncome]<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MedianHouseholdIncome1.png>

Adjusting for inflation, US households are making what they once did in
1989.  In fact, the US homeownership rate is heading back in this direction
as well:
[image: ownership
rate]<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ownership-rate.jpg>
<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ownership-rate.jpg>

Historically, US households have stored most of their wealth in housing.
So the overall drop in homeownership and the big increase in renting means
more Americans are being left out of the most typical way of building
wealth.  Of course, before the banking system turned housing into one giant
casino, most households had very simple guidepost of entry.  You bought
when you were ready.  You bought in an area you planned on staying in.  You
didn’t have to worry about buying at the top or bottom of rollercoaster
swings in real estate that occur courtesy of the whims of the Fed.  Today,
you have some markets were over half of purchases are investors and in some
areas home prices are rising by 30 percent annually even though incomes are
falling!

This path is unsustainable and we even saw what happens when hints of
removing the taper hit the market.  The market understands that the Fed is
the major player here.  For most Americans all thebanking
bailouts<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/cash-buyers-real-estate-all-cash-buyer-percent-of-market/>
have
resulted in massive residential grabs by banks who are outbidding regular
families.

People have a keen sense as to what is happening.  This has been and is a
bailout of the wealthy:

[image: 2 day 
move]<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-day-move.png>

“(SoberLook <http://soberlook.com/>) Mortgage rates declined – a full 14
basis points. So that’s the impact on the “real economy” of delaying
“taper”? To make matters worse the decline in jumbo mortgage rates was
higher than in conforming mortgages. Between the pop in investment
portfolios and the drop in jumbo rates, those who are well off to begin
with are more likely to benefit from this policy decision. Was that the
intent?”

Jumbo rates only impact a tiny portion of the market.  In the Bay Area,
jumbo loans make up 47.8 of all housing purchases and 27.2 percent of the
market in California.  Throw in cash buyers and over half the market is
being driven by “cash buying” and those taking on jumbo mortgages.  You
think this is helping the ownership rate in high cost areas?

[image: california
homeownership]<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/california-homeownership.png>

Not at all.  And jumbo mortgages are a miniscule part of the market across
the US.  Welcome to renter
nation<http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/us-housing-affordability-drops-rising-rates-incomes-hpi/>
.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get
updated housing commentary, analysis, and
information.<http://feedproxy.google.com/DrHousingBubble-HowILearnedToLoveSocal>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to