>
> NYT'S PAUL KRUGMAN ACCUSED OF PLAGIARISM
> ------------------------------
> Print ArticleSend a 
> Tip<http://www.breitbart.com/System/Breitbart%20Send%20A%20Tip?page=%2fBig-Journalism%2f2013%2f08%2f20%2fNYT-Paul-Krugman-Accused-Of-Plagiarism>
> by WYNTON HALL <http://www.breitbart.com/Columnists/Wynton-Hall> 20 Aug
> 2013 
> 521<http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/08/20/NYT-Paul-Krugman-Accused-Of-Plagiarism#disqus_thread>POST
> A 
> COMMENT<http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/08/20/NYT-Paul-Krugman-Accused-Of-Plagiarism#comments>
> *New York Times* columnist and Nobel Prize winning Princeton economist
> Paul Krugman is battling plagiarism charges after a distinguished UCLA
> professor of economics leveled the accusation against him on his blog.
>
> In an open 
> letter<http://www.rogerfarmer.com/NewWeb/WebPages/letter%20to%20paul.htm> to
> Paul Krugman, UCLA economics professor Roger Farmer alleges that Krugman
> stole his ideas and repackaged them in his *New York Times* columns.
>
> "Perhaps you have read some of my recent work: Perhaps not. I infer that
> you may be aware of it since your columns often select themes that closely
> mirror my writings, usually a day or two after they are circulated. Perhaps
> that is due to the coincidence fairy," writes Farmer.
>
> Farmer says his accusations are not personal and that he likes Krugman's
> works and shares many of his Keynesian economic views. However, Krugman's
> failure to cite the professor's work was a "step too far," writes Farmer.
>
> The plagiarism charges were so serious that Krugman felt compelled to
> address them in a curiously worded *New York Times* blog 
> posting<http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/communicating-economics/?_r=1&;>
> .
>
> "A somewhat belated response to Roger Farmer, who accused me of cribbing
> from his writings. The truth is sadder; I haven't read any of his stuff,"
> Krugman begins.
>
> Then, in the next sentence, Krugman appeared to contradict himself by
> conceding that he was, in fact, familiar with Farmer's writings and had
> read them.
>
> "I've tried, a couple of times, but found it very hard to penetrate and
> gave up."
>
> Krugman used the rest of his blog post to lecture Farmer on the finer
> points of economic writing.
>
> "Neither I nor most economists are going to make the effort of puzzling
> through difficult writings unless we're given some sort of proof of
> concept--a motivating example, a simple and effective summary, something to
> indicate that the effort will be worthwhile," Krugman wrote. "Sorry, but I
> won't commit to sitting through your two-hour movie if you can't show me an
> interesting three-minute trailer."
>
> Krugman added: "What every economist, and for that matter every writer on
> any subject, needs to realize is that unless you are a powerful person and
> people are looking for clues about what you'll do next, nobody has to read
> what you write--and lecturing them about what they're missing doesn't help."
>
> *New York Times* editors have not commented on whether any internal
> investigation into the plagiarism allegation is underway.
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to