[image: 131102censor]

*(Editor’s note: Colin Flaherty has done more reporting than any other
journalist on what appears to be a nationwide trend of skyrocketing
black-on-white crime, violence and abuse. WND features these reports to
counterbalance the virtual blackout by the rest of the media due to their
concerns that reporting such incidents would be inflammatory or even
racist. WND considers it racist *not* to report racial abuse solely because
of the skin color of the perpetrators or victims.) Videos linked or
embedded may contain foul language and violence.*

When a mom and daughter were kidnapped, forced to withdraw money from an
ATM, raped, then shot last week, the Indianapolis Star played it by the
book: Do not mention the suspects are black.



The “book” in this case is written by the Society of Professional
Journalists<http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/new-more-black-mob-violence-and-denial-indianapolis/>,
headquartered just three miles from the scene of the crime. In last month’s
issue of the SPJ magazine, the oldest and largest organization of
journalists in America reminded its members how they should report racial
violence.

Don’t.

The SPJ story was just repeating what dozens of chapters around the country
tell its members in regular seminars: Unless someone is considerate enough
to wave around a sign saying, “Kill Honky,” or issue a press release or
utter racial expletives in front of lots of witnesses, the fact that the
suspects just happen to be black has no bearing on the story.

And if you wonder about it, you are probably a “racist and hater,” said the
SPJ.

Never mind that when Indianapolis police dispatchers take a 911 call, one
of the first questions they ask is about race.

Never mind when these same dispatchers talk to patrolmen on publicly
accessible scanners, one of the first pieces of information they broadcast
is the race of the suspects.

Never mind that Indianapolis is the scene of dozens of recent examples of
black mob 
violence<http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/new-more-black-mob-violence-and-denial-indianapolis/>,
though you would not know it from reading the Indianapolis Star.

Many of these episodes are centered downtown, near the gleaming but
increasingly empty Circle Mall. Many are connected to the Indiana Black
Expo held every summer. And when police flood the zone to prevent more
black mob violence downtown – with helicopters and horses and SWAT teams –
the rowdy sometimes take a bus to a local mall and create violence and
mayhem there.

Many of these episodes of black mob violence are on video. Many are
documented in “White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to
America and How the Media Ignore
It,”<http://superstore.wnd.com/books/White-Girl-Bleed-A-Lot-Autographed-Paperback>which
has an entire chapter on Indianapolis.

To be fair, Indianapolis is not remarkably different from Kansas City,
Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, Philadelphia,
Brooklyn, Manhattan, Greensboro, Rochester, Richmond, Miami Beach, Fresno,
Louisville, Memphis, Greensboro and more than 100 other centers of regular
and intense black mob violence: The papers in those towns are loathe to
report it as well. They say they are color blind.

These are the same papers that every day run stories about black caucuses,
black churches, black
colleges<http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/newspapers-ordered-to-cover-up-black-violence/>,
black TV 
stations<http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/newspapers-ordered-to-cover-up-black-violence/>,
black expos, black radio, black newspapers, black blogs and on and on.

But black mob violence? Not a thing.

People in Indianapolis are wondering why: They question why the paper is so
heavily invested in refusing to let their readers know that black mob
violence exists exponentially out of proportion in their town.

Daniel Lee is just one of dozens who left comments at the IndyStar.com and
other web 
sites<http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/new-more-black-mob-violence-and-denial-indianapolis/>
:

“The Star won’t publish the suspects’ race unless it’s part of a ‘detailed’
description including clothes, hairstyle, Italian or German-style
boots<http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/newspapers-ordered-to-cover-up-black-violence/>,
hoop or stud earrings, buttons, snaps or hook-and-eye fasteners, plaid or
paisley, earth-tones or vibrant joyful colors, full description of every
visible tattoo, etc,” Lee quipped. “It’s their way of avoiding what they
consider the racism of calling black suspects ‘black.’”

Johnny West piled on: “It is completely irresponsible for the Star to not
have a description of the suspects included in this story. This story is
useless to the community without a timely description. If police did not
release a description, that should be noted in the story.”

David Hogan noticed a pattern: “I do not understand why the Indy Star will
not release a description of the suspects. According to IMPD, 4-5 black
male suspects, one of which who was wearing a grey hooded sweatshirt, were
involved.

“I got this from the Channel 8 news site. Bill McClerry is the reporter on
this story,” Hogan continued. “Hey, Bill, if you are reading these
comments, can you please explain why the Indy Star does not release a
physical description other than maybe height and age of the possible
suspects? I think it would be helpful to get a reason behind this critical
omission of facts surrounding this and other stories the paper has reported
in the past.”

On and on it went until Alvie Lindsay, the “News and Investigations
Director” at the Star stepped in to explain it all.

“Lots of questions here about descriptions of suspects,” Lindsay responded.
“We are working to update the story. If and when we have a detailed
description of the suspects – and not merely race and gender, but something
that could reasonably help the public identify individuals – that
information will be included.

“Bill, our reporter, just talked to the IMPD spokesman who said there are
no other such details at this point,” Lindsay continued. “It’s actually not
clear, he said, how many suspects were involved. No age range has been
provided, either.”

After reading the story, several commentators mistakenly came to believe
that these details were not available. Or that the victims were not aware
of the racial identity of the suspects.

Said Barbara Grasher Howard, “Did you not read the article? It clearly said
the victims weren’t able to recall details. Police are hoping they’re more
able to do so once the trauma is somewhat past” – which is not true.

But at least the Indy Star allows some comments on the topic. Other daily
papers often do not, or close comments altogether when the subject is
racial violence.

The Indy Star may refuse to report on racial violence, but lots of people
know about it anyway. Abdul Hakim-Shabazz is an Indianapolis attorney and
community activist who has heard it all before. Writing in Indiana
Barrister, Hakim Shabazz says it is time to take off the blinders and
confront the racial roots of the violence and lawlessness in Indianapolis.

“Indianapolis, you have a problem. Your problem is young, black men who are
out of control. … It’s time to step up and start making examples out of
people,” Hakim-Shabazz writes. “Decent citizens, black and white, should
not have to live in fear of urban terrorists.”

Meanwhile, over at the SPJ headquarters, of the 35 people who are staffers
and members of the board or directors, none is black.

*Black mobs routinely terrorize cities across the country, but the media
and government are silent. Read the detailed account of rampant racial
crime in “White Girl Bleed A Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America
and How the Media Ignore It.”
<http://superstore.wnd.com/Welcome/White-Girl-Bleed-A-Lot-Autographed-Paperback>*

See a trailer for “White Girl Bleed a Lot”:


Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/newspapers-ordered-to-cover-up-black-violence/#kMIZYdpEkzWL5zPT.99


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to