http://www.nationalreview.com/node/363531/print
The Drift toward Despotism

Mark Steyn

At a time when over 4 million people have had their health insurance
canceled, it’s good to know that some Americans can still access prompt
medical treatment, even if they don’t want it. David Eckert was pulled over
by police in Deming, N.M., for failing to come to a complete halt at a stop
sign in the Walmart parking lot. He was asked to step out of the vehicle,
and waited on the sidewalk. Officers decided that they didn’t like the
tight clench of his buttocks, a subject on which New Mexico’s constabulary
is apparently expert, and determined that it was because he had illegal
drugs secreted therein. So they arrested him, and took him to Gila Regional
Medical Center in neighboring Hidalgo County, where Mr. Eckert was forced
to undergo two abdominal X-rays, two rectal probes, three enemas, and
defecate thrice in front of medical staff and representatives of two
law-enforcement agencies, before being sedated and subjected to a
colonoscopy — all procedures performed against his will and without a valid
warrant.

Alas, Mr. Eckert’s body proved to be a drug-free zone, and so, after twelve
hours of detention, he was released. If you’re wondering where his lawyer
was during all this, no attorney was present, as police had not charged Mr.
Eckert with anything, so they’re apparently free to frolic and gambol up
his rectum to their hearts’ content. Deming police chief Brandon Gigante
says his officers did everything “by the book.” That’s the problem, in New
Mexico and beyond: “the book.”

Getting into the spirit of things, Gila Regional Medical Center
subsequently sent Mr. Eckert a bill for $6,000. It appears he had one of
what the president calls those “bad apple” plans that doesn’t cover anal
rape. Doubtless, under the new regime, Obamacare navigators will be happy
to take a trip up your northwest passage free of charge. That’s what it is,
by the way: anal rape. The euphemisms with which the state dignifies the
process — “cavity search” — are distinctions that exist only in the mind of
the perpetrator, not the fellow on the receiving end. Fleet Street’s* Daily
Mail* reports that this is at least the second anal fishing expedition
mounted by local authorities. Timothy Young underwent a similar experience
after being fingered by the same police dog, Leo, who may not be very good
at sniffing drugs but certainly has an eye for a pert bottom. At the time
of Mr. Young’s arrest, Leo’s police license had reportedly expired a
year-and-a-half earlier, but why get hung up on technicalities?

Messrs. Eckert and Young may yet win their cases. But one notes that the
Supreme Court has dramatically circumscribed Fourth Amendment protections
against unreasonable search and seizure when it occurs at America’s border,
and post-9/11 the “border” has been redefined to mean anywhere within 100
miles of the actual frontier. Many European countries are not 100 miles
wide in their entirety. A hundred-mile buffer zone from Belgium’s northern
border, for example, would be well south of the southern border and deep
into France. But Deming falls within the 100-mile Fourth Amendment–free
zone, and so, I note, between the seacoast and the Quebec border, does the
whole of my own state of New Hampshire. It would be prudent perhaps for
Granite Staters to affect a loose-buttocked saunter when strolling around
the White Mountains.

Of course, even with millions of canceled health-care policies freeing up
medical staff, it is unlikely that the authorities could ever give the full
Deming PD treatment to the bulk of the populace. Perhaps that’s why
Americans do not seem to get terribly exercised by these cases. There are
over 300 million people, and the chances of Leo taking a fancy to one’s own
posterior are relatively remote. Yet tyranny is always capricious, and the
willingness of police and compliant doctors and nurses to go along with it
ought to disturb a supposedly free people, no matter how comparatively rare
it may seem.

Meanwhile, an unarmed woman was gunned down on the streets of Washington
for no apparent crime other than driving too near Barackingham Palace and
thereby posing a threat to national security. As disturbing as Miriam
Carey’s bullet-riddled body and vehicle were, the public indifference to it
is even worse. Ms. Carey does not appear to be guilty of any act other than
a panic attack when the heavy-handed and heavier-armed palace guard began
yelling at her. Much of what was reported in the hours after her death
seems dubious: We are told Ms. Carey was “mentally ill,” although she had
no medications in her vehicle and those at her home back in Connecticut are
sufficiently routine as to put millions of other Americans in the category
of legitimate target. We are assured that she suffered from post-partum
depression, as if the inability to distinguish between a depressed mom and
a suicide bomber testifies to the officers’ professionalism. Under D.C.
police rules, cops are not permitted to fire on a moving vehicle, because
of the risk to pedestrians and other drivers. But the Secret Service and
the Capitol Police enjoy no such restraints, so the car doors are full of
bullet holes. The final moments of the encounter remain a mystery, but
police were supposedly able to extract Ms. Carey’s baby from the back of a
two-door vehicle before dispatching the defenseless mother to meet her
maker.

Did I mention she was African American? When a black teen dies in a
late-night one-on-one encounter with a fellow citizen on the streets of
Sanford, Fla., it’s the biggest thing since Selma. But when a defenseless
black woman is gunned down by a posse of robocops in broad daylight on the
streets of the capital, the Reverend Jackson and the Reverend Sharpton and
all the other bouffed and pampered grievance-mongers are apparently cool
with it.

This isn’t very difficult. When you need large numbers of supposedly highly
trained elite officers to kill an unarmed woman with a baby, you’re doing
it wrong. In perhaps the most repugnant reaction to Ms. Carey’s death, the
United States Congress expressed their “gratitude” to the officers who
killed her and gave them a standing ovation. Back in the Eighties, the
Queen woke up to find a confused young man at the end of her bed. She
talked to him calmly until help arrived and he was led away. A few years
later, Her Majesty’s Canadian prime minister, Jean Chrétien, was confronted
by an aggrieved protester. As is his wont, he dealt with it somewhat more
forcefully than his sovereign, throttling the guy, forcing him to the
ground, and breaking his tooth, until the Mounties arrived to rescue the
assailant from the prime minister. But, had the London and Ottawa intruders
been gunned down by SWAT teams, I cannot imagine for a moment either the
British or Canadian parliament rising to applaud such an outcome. This was
a repulsive act by Congress.

Miriam Carey is already forgotten, and the lawyer her family hired has now,
conveniently, been jailed for a bad debt. I am not one for cheap historical
analogies: My mother spent four of her childhood years under Nazi
occupation, and it is insulting to her and millions of others who know the
real thing to bandy overheated comparisons. But there is a despotic trend
in American government. Too many of our rulers and their enforcers
reflexively see the citizenry primarily as a threat. Which is why the
tautness of one’s buns is now probable cause, and why in Congress the
so-called people’s representatives’ first instinct is to stand and cheer
the death of a defenseless woman.

*—* *Mark Steyn <http://www.steynonline.com/>, a* National Review *columnist,
is the author of* After America: Get Ready for
Armageddon<http://www.nationalreview.com/redirect/amazon.p?j=1596981008>*.
© 2013 Mark Steyn*




__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to