http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/senator-us-soldiers-killed-terror-groups-backed-us/story?id=20660114


Senator: US Soldiers Being Killed by Terror Groups Backed With US Money

Nov. 11, 2013

By BRIAN ROSS
Is US Money Funding Terror in Afghanistan?


The United States has paid more than $150 million to companies in
Afghanistan that are accused of helping to finance terrorist attacks on
American soldiers and facilities, according to the Special Inspector General
for Afghanistan Reconstruction.

"It's like the United States government subsidizing the Taliban, al Qaeda,
the Haqqani network, those groups that are trying to shoot and kill our
soldiers," said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., a member of the Senate's Armed
Services and Foreign Relations committees, in an interview to be broadcast
tonight on ABC News' "World News with Diane Sawyer".

A list of 43 companies in Afghanistan was compiled by the Special Inspector
General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) using data from both
classified Pentagon investigative reports and Commerce Department lists of
terror-connected companies.

Among them is a road construction company the U.S. says is partly owned by a
leader of the brutal Haqqani network, which was blamed for an
attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul that claimed 16 lives in 2011.

The cover letter of a classified investigation by the U.S. Army said there
was evidence of a direct role of both the company and its owners "in the
facilitation and operation of the Haqqani Network" and that "approximately
$1-2 million per month flow[s] to Haqqani Network to finance its
activities."

A representative of the company said it denies any ties to terrorists and is
contesting its inclusion on the U.S. government lists. The representative
suggested it might be a case of mistaken identity.

But despite the broader findings, the Pentagon has resisted permanently
blocking the companies from getting more U.S. contracts because, its lawyers
say, it would violate the "due process" of the companies which would not be
able to see the classified information that details their alleged ties to
terror groups.

"The reason they've given us is that it's not fair to these contractors that
the evidence that we've presented, and this is evidence collected by the
United States government, is classified," John Sopko, Special Inspector
General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), told ABC News. "That's the
absurdity of it. We can probably attack them via drone on Monday and we'll
issue them a contract on Tuesday."

Sopko, along with U.S. commanders in the field and members of Congress have
all urged the Pentagon to take action, but to no avail.

Sen. Shaheen was one of a bipartisan group of Senators that sent a letter to
the Army in late 2012 "expressing concern" about a backlog at the Army's
Suspension and Debarment office, noting the 43 cases involving alleged
terrorist groups.

"We believe that these 43 cases deserve special attention from the Army due
to the nature of their allegations," the letter said, according to a copy
posted on the website for Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn.

The Pentagon had arranged for ABC News to interview Lt. Gen. William
Phillips of Army acquisition about the concerns, but later canceled, his
staff saying "they will be declining an interview for some time in the
foreseeable future."

When ABC News appeared at the Pentagon office that handles the debarment of
contracts, the officer in charge said he was not allowed to answer questions
without permission.

"Well, there are certain regulations that have to be followed, due process
regulations," he began, presumably referring to the contract debarment
process. "That gets into things that I cannot discuss. In fact, I'm not
allowed to talk to you unless I have the permission of the Army so I'll have
to end this interview at this time."

In a statement to ABC News, the Army said it has "extensive vendor vetting
procedures to prevent the awarding of contracts to such vendors." It said
most of the 43 companies were not awarded any new contracts "as a result of
measures currently in place."

"The army takes seriously any allegations of improper contractor activities
and has vigorous processes to ensure that those with whom we do business are
not supporting the insurgency or otherwise opposing U.S. and collation
forces in Afghanistan" the statement said.

Inspector General Sopko says the Army needs to permanently block the
companies from receiving any more U.S. taxpayer money, given the seriousness
of the information.

"I am a former prosecutor, I've seen the information and it made my hair
stand on end," Sopko told ABC News.

In a quarterly report to Congress last July Sopko wrote, "I am deeply
troubled that the U.S. military can pursue, attack, and even kill terrorists
and their supporters, but that some in the U.S. government believe we cannot
prevent these same people from receiving a government contract."

"I feel such a position is not only legally wrong, it is contrary to good
public policy and contrary to our national security goals in Afghanistan,"
he said.



__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to