http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/11/16/obama-pushing-shooters-off-public-lands




*Obama Pushing Shooters Off Public Lands *

By Paul Bedard <http://www.usnews.com/topics/author/paul_bedard>


November 16, 2011
Gun owners who have historically been able to use public lands for target
practice would be barred from potentially millions of acres under new rules
drafted by the Interior Department, the first major move by the Obama
administration to impose limits on firearms.



Officials say the administration is concerned about the potential clash
between gun owners and encroaching urban populations who like to use same
land for hiking and dog walking.

"It's not so much a safety issue. It's a social conflict issue," said Frank
Jenks, a natural resource specialist with Interior's Bureau of Land
Management, which oversees 245 million acres. He adds that urbanites "freak
out" when they hear shooting on public lands. [Read about the subpoena
issued as a result of Operation Fast and
Furious<http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/10/12/congress-subpoenas-attorney-general-holder>
.]

If the draft policy is finally approved, some public access to Bureau lands
to hunters would also be limited, potentially reducing areas deer, elk, and
bear hunters can use in the West.

Conservationists and hunting groups, however, are mounting a fight. One
elite group of conservationists that advises Interior and Agriculture is
already pushing BLM to junk the regulations, claiming that shooters are
being held to a much higher safety standard than other users of public
lands, such as ATV riders.

"They are just trying to make it so difficult for recreational shooters,"
said Gary Kania, vice president of the Congressional Sportsmen's
Foundation. His group is one of several, including the National Wildlife
Foundation, Cabela's and Ducks Unlimited, on the Wildlife and Hunting
Heritage Conservation Council fighting the new rules. During a two-day
meeting ending this afternoon, they are drafting their own changes to the
BLM rules.

"What we probably are going to be looking forward to is a reversal," said
Kania. Asked about how to handle people who freak out when they hear shots
on public lands, Kania said, "I don't know how to quanitify 'freaking
out,'" and noted that he's seen people panicing when fly fishing in float
tubes but nobody wants to ban then from rivers.

BLM actually invited the fight, seeking the council's comments. But
officials suggested to Whispers that no changes are being planned to the
draft regulations.

Over five pages, the draft BLM regulations raise concerns about how
shooting can cause a "public disturbance." They also raise worries about
how shooting and shooters can hurt plants and litter public lands.

This is the key paragraph foes say could lead to shooters being kicked off
public lands:

"When the authorized officer determines that a site or area on BLM-managed
lands used on a regular basis for recreational shooting is creating public
disturbance, or is creating risk to other persons on public lands; is
contributing to the defacement, removal or destruction of natural features,
native plants, cultural resources, historic structures or government and/or
private property; is facilitating or creating a condition of littering,
refuse accumulation and abandoned personal property is violating existing
use restrictions, closure and restriction orders, or supplementary rules
notices, and reasonable attempts to reduce or eliminate the violations by
the BLM have been unsuccessful, the authorized officer will close the
affected area to recreational shooting." [Check out new  Debate Club about
whether Congress needs to overhaul gun trafficking
laws.]<http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-eric-holder-lose-his-job/anti-trafficking-laws-need-an-overhaul>

Squeezing out shooters, says the draft policy, is needed because, "As the
West has become more populated, recreational shooters now often find
themselves in conflict with other public lands users, and the BLM is
frequently called on to mediate these conflicts."

At yesterday's meeting at Interior, the council balked at the BLM draft
regulations, adding that the Obama administration was not being fair to
shooters on the issue of safety.

In a draft retort to
BLM<http://www.fws.gov/whhcc/doc/BLMshootingsportspolicycomments.pdf>,
the council said other users of public land aren't required to be as safe
as shooters. They note that shooters have a much lower injury rate than
others, like ATV users. "The policy fails to recognize that recreational
shooting has one of the lowest incidences of death and injury compared to
virtually any other outdoor recreational activity. The policy is
prejudicial and discriminatory to target shooters as compared to other
recreationists," said the council's draft response, expected to be
finalized today.

What's more, the group charged that the BLM is acting in a contradictory
fashion, encouraging the shooting sports while limiting shooting areas.

   - *See: the month's best political cartoons
   <http://www.usnews.com/politicalcartoons>.*
   - *Read more: about Operation Fast and Furious
   
<http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/07/06/fast--furious-was-much-broader-issa-charges>.*
   - *Check out: our editorial cartoons on President Obama
   <http://www.usnews.com/opinion/photos/barack-obama-cartoons>.*

Tags:
Barack Obama, <http://www.usnews.com/topics/people/barack_obama>
gun control and gun
rights<http://www.usnews.com/topics/subjects/gun-control-and-gun-rights>




__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to