Just curious: Why the rename from PolicyKit to polkit and PolicyKit-gnome to polkit-gnome?
Would you like package descriptions to be updated and use the new names? I also find it a bit ugly, that you tag a -1 to each and every instance, even the D-Bus name. Which brings me to my next concern: Apparently you want to have those versions to be completely co-installable. What happens to already granted permissions, will they be migrated, will we have two databases which are completely out of sync? This brings me to the question, why have co-installability at all? Why does PolicyKit 0.90 not simply provide the the legacy backwards compatible interfaces (libs and D-Bus) and simply imports and converts the exising authentication db on first run. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ polkit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/polkit-devel
