On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:09:45 PM UTC-6, Rob Dodson wrote: > > I would recommend raising an issue with the LESS team. Both ::shadow and > /deep/ have shipped in Chrome (and I believe Opera) so they're valid CSS > that need to be supported > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Takayoshi Kochi <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> ::shadow only applies to the shadow roots in the current tree scope, >> while /deep/ is a combinator >> which penetrates any number of shadow root boundaries. So if you have an >> element with #ink >> in nested shadow roots, only the rule with /deep/ can match. >> >> Just wanted to add feedback to the polymer team that #ink is a very poor choice here. Surely it out to be #paper-ink or #polymer-ink. As more and more web component sets become available, there are going to be clashes in the global CSS namespace.
Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/75a1e42e-4380-48e2-bd38-a9c50b6477d1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
