Hence why I said this (as long as it is a desktop/server and not a laptop): :D
http://www.amazon.com/2port-Pci-16c550-Serial-ocard/dp/B00006B8C0 Michael R. Overholser Color Broadband Inc. Phone:562 983 7880 Support Press 1 Fax: 562 983 7881 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Norton Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:11 AM To: Anssi Johansson Cc: NTP Pool List Subject: Re: [Pool] External device sync / PPS / USB On 3/2/2011 11:00 AM, Anssi Johansson wrote: Hi, using USB (either via serial port adapters or otherwise) for time synchronization is most probably just a waste of your time and money. So, in short, don't do it. A longer answer to this question can be found from http://gpsd.berlios.de/faq.html#time , for example. Thought so. The hidden point not mentioned at that link is that for many systems (most notably, laptops), serial/RS232 ports are implemented over the USB bus, so it's not safe to say that a serial/RS232 port is sufficient. It must be one that is implemented over an appropriate underlying bus. On 3/2/2011 11:32 AM, David J Taylor wrote: Using a Sitecom USB hub which includes a serial port, I made a comparison here, Daniel: http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-serial-port.html#usb Yes, it does increase the jitter. Whilst certainly not as good as a direct connection, it's considerably better than a LAN-only connection. Well, in your setup that might be true (and with the shorter polling interval), but it's probably dependent on the other USB traffic on that same hub (and on up to the main bus). So I guess it's possible, but probably inadvisable. -- Daniel
_______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
